Breast Cancer, Breast Cancer Early Stage Breast Cancer (Stage 1-3), Cardio-oncology, Cardiovascular Health, Circulatory and Respiratory Health, Clinical and Translational Cardiovascular Sciences, Health Services and Systems - Healthcare Effectiveness &Amp; Outcomes
Conditions
Keywords
Trastuzumab, Cardiac imaging, Her-2 positive breast cancer, Echocardiography, Cardiotoxicity, Left ventricular ejection fraction, Heart failure, Randomized controlled trial, Nuclear imaging, Non-inferiority
Brief summary
This study focuses on male and female patients being treated for breast cancer that is positive for the HER2 receptor which requires special treatments targeting that receptor. The problem is that these treatments, while effective for the cancer, can sometimes harm the heart. Because of this, patients have to undergo heart tests every three months during treatment, even if they have no history of heart disease or feel fine. The guidelines for these regular heart tests were established decades ago when these treatments were first introduced, but research shows that most of these tests don't actually change the treatment plan. This suggests that many patients are going through unnecessary tests, which can cause stress, delay treatments, and increase healthcare costs. To address this, the researchers propose a new study with 300 patients with HER2 positive breast cancer to test a more personalized approach to cardiac surveillance. Participants will be classified based on their risk of heart problems: low or intermediate. Instead of testing every patient every three months, those in the intermediate group will be tested every 4 months, and those in the low-risk group will be tested every 6 months. The researchers will compare this new approach to the current system to see if fewer tests are just as safe and effective. The researchers will measure heart health, how well cancer treatments are completed, and how patients feel about having fewer tests. If this new approach works, it could save money and reduce the burden on female patients without risking their health.
Interventions
Participants will be randomized to judicious imaging (decreased imaging frequency based on HF risk category) or SOC (imaging every 3 months). Participants who do not have any HF risk factors will be categorized as low risk, while participants with at least one risk factor will be categorized as intermediate risk for HF. Low Risk (zero risk factors): imaging before cycles 1 and 9 of HER2-TT (i.e., at baseline and near the halfway mark, corresponding to 2 fewer studies than SOC in Year 1), then after the end of HER2TT. This translates to imaging every 6 months for uninterrupted adjuvant HER2TT. Intermediate Risk (any risk factors): imaging before cycles 1, 6, and 12 of HER2-TT (i.e., at baseline and near the 1/3 and 2/3 marks, corresponding to 1 fewer study than SOC in Year 1), then at end of HER2TT. This translates to imaging every 4 months for uninterrupted adjuvant HER2TT.
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Participants will be randomized to one of two groups with regards to the frequency of mandatory echocardiograms: Group 1 - Standard of Care Group: Participants in this group will receive imaging before cycles 1, 5, 9, and 13 of trastuzumab (or every 3 months) and another echocardiogram after completion of trastuzumab (within 100 days after completion of HER2TT). Group 2 - Judicious Imaging Group: This group will get less echocardiograms based on their risk of developing heart failure. People who do not have any issues that predispose to heart failure are categorized as low risk and will get an echocardiogram once every 6 months. People who have factors that may predispose to heart failure are categorized as intermediate risk and will get an echocardiogram approximately once every 4 months.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Stage 1-3 breast cancer (BC). 2. Age 18-79 years. 3. HER-2 positive BC with planned HER2 targeted therapy (HER2TT) for curative intent.
Exclusion criteria
1. Distant metastases detected clinically, radiographically, or histologically 2. Baseline echocardiogram images of insufficient quality for a quantitative assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 3. Pre-existing cardiovascular disease, defined as: 1. Prior myocardial infarction (even if LVEF has normalized) 2. Prior heart failure (HF, including patients with preserved ejection fraction and normalized LVEF) 3. Baseline LVEF \<55% 4. Atrial fibrillation 5. Greater than moderate valvular disease (i.e., severe, or moderate-severe) 4. Cumulative anthracycline exposure ≥250mg/m2 before starting HER2TT 5. New York Heart Association Functional Class II, III or IV, or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score \>2\* 6. Symptoms potentially due to serious cardiac disease as per investigator's judgement\* \*Exclusion criterion adopted as they make clinical assessment less reliable to detect emergent HF.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Clinically overt heart failure | From enrollment to <100days after end of treatment | Determined as a binary event Y/N, per standardized definition |
| Premature HER2TT discontinuation | From enrollment to <100days after end of treatment | Determined as a binary event Y/N, per clinical records |
| Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) of anxiety/depression, stress, and treatment burden | From enrollment to <100 days after end of treatment | Desirable outcome is a better scores in ≥2 of 3 PROMs-Treatment Burden Questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Perceived Stress Scale |
| Asymptomatic cardiotoxicity at end of HER2TT | From enrollment to <100 days after the end of treatment | Per Cardiac Review and Evaluation Committee criteria, based on LVEF change |
| Time to complete HER2TT | From enrollment to <100 days after the end of treatment | Number weeks from first HER2TT cycle to last (shorter is better) |
| Total number of cardiac imaging tests during HER2TT | From enrollment to <100 days after the end of treatment | Number of LVEF assessments (fewer is better) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Absolute change in percentage of LVEF | From baseline imaging to one year | Based on cardiac imaging. Analyzed for non-inferiority of judicious imaging versus standard of care |
| Desirability Ratio | From enrollment to <100 days after the end of treatment | Limited to primary outcomes 1-5 (excluding the number of cardiac imaging tests) |
Countries
Canada