Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Entacapone Combined With Madopar in the Treatment of Early Parkinson's Disease: An Observational, Multicenter, Case-Control Study

Efficacy and Safety of Entacapone Combined With Madopar in the Treatment of Early Parkinson's Disease: An Observational, Multicenter, Case-Control Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06928519
Enrollment
216
Registered
2025-04-15
Start date
2025-06-05
Completion date
2027-06-30
Last updated
2025-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease (PD)

Keywords

Parkinson Disease, Levodopa, Benserazide, Entacapone

Brief summary

This observational, multicenter, case-control study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Entacapone combined with Madopar (levodopa/benserazide) in the treatment of early-stage Parkinson's disease (PD) among Chinese patients. The study will enroll patients diagnosed with PD according to the MDS criteria, aged 18-80, with modified Hoehn-Yahr stages 1-2.5, and who have not previously used Entacapone. Participants will be assigned to two groups based on their prior treatment history: the LBE group (levodopa/benserazide/entacapone) or the LB group (levodopa/benserazide only), according to their actual clinical treatment plan. The study will observe patients over a 24-week period, evaluating changes in motor symptoms using the MDS-UPDRS Part III score as the primary endpoint. Secondary outcomes include assessments of daily living abilities, motor complications, quality of life (PDQ-39), cognitive function (MMSE), global impression (CGI), and safety profiles, including adverse event reporting. This study does not involve any interventional treatment changes; all therapeutic decisions remain at the discretion of the treating physicians. The findings are expected to provide real-world evidence regarding the potential benefits and safety of adding Entacapone to Madopar in the management of early PD.

Detailed description

This is an observational, multicenter, case-control study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Entacapone combined with Madopar (Levodopa/Benserazide, LB) in the treatment of early-stage Parkinson's disease (PD) in Chinese patients. The study is conducted across multiple centers in China and includes patients diagnosed with PD according to the MDS criteria, aged 18-80 years, with a modified Hoehn-Yahr stage of 1-2.5. Participants will be divided into two groups based on their actual clinical treatment: (1) the LBE group (Levodopa/Benserazide/Entacapone) and (2) the LB group (Levodopa/Benserazide only). The study does not involve any randomization, blinding, or intervention allocation; instead, it reflects real-world clinical practice, where all treatment decisions are made solely by the attending physician. The study will observe patients over a 24-week period to compare the effectiveness of the two treatment strategies in improving motor symptoms, daily living activities, and quality of life, as well as the incidence of adverse events. The primary outcome measure is the change in MDS-UPDRS Part III (motor examination) score from baseline to Week 24. Secondary outcomes include changes in MDS-UPDRS Part II (activities of daily living), Part IV (motor complications), total MDS-UPDRS II+III scores, PDQ-39 quality of life scores, Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scores, MMSE cognitive scores, and modified Hoehn-Yahr staging. Safety assessments include adverse events, serious adverse events, vital signs, laboratory tests, and ECG findings. All treatments, including medication selection, dosage, and adjustment, will follow the treating physician's routine clinical judgment, and no intervention or modification by the study team will occur. Concomitant medications such as amantadine, anticholinergics, dopamine agonists, and MAO-B inhibitors (e.g., selegiline, rasagiline) are allowed if their doses are stable for at least 30 days before enrollment and remain unchanged throughout the study period. The estimated sample size is 216 participants, with approximately 108 in each group, allowing for a 10% dropout rate. The study is expected to start in June 2025 and complete by April 2027, with final data analysis by June 2027. The results of this study aim to provide real-world evidence regarding the potential benefits and safety of Entacapone combined with Madopar in the early-stage PD population in China.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Jiangbin Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Guangxi International Zhuang Medicine Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Ethnic Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Guangxi Hospital Division of The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Yousheng Xiao
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Age between 18 and 80 years; Diagnosed with Parkinson's Disease based on the MDS criteria, confirmed by a movement disorder neurologist; Modified Hoehn and Yahr stage between 1 and 2.5; No prior use of entacapone; MMSE score ≥ 26; BDI (Beck Depression Inventory) score \< 15; Either: Has never used levodopa before, or Has been on a stable dose of levodopa (300-600 mg/day) for at least 1 month prior to enrollment; Stable doses of amantadine, anticholinergics, dopamine agonists, selegiline, or rasagiline are allowed if maintained for at least 30 days prior to and during the study; Willing and able to give informed consent and comply with study procedures, with caregiver support if needed.

Exclusion criteria

Previous use of entacapone or tolcapone for more than 30 days, or within 4 weeks before baseline; Use of dopamine agonists within 4 weeks before baseline; BDI score ≥ 15; MMSE score \< 26; Unstable levodopa dosage; History of dyskinesia; Diagnosis of atypical or secondary parkinsonism, or history of PD-related neurosurgery; Clinically significant medical conditions within the past 5 years that could interfere with study participation; Use of medications known to induce parkinsonism; Participation in other investigational drug trials within 30 days before baseline.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline to Week 24 in the MDS-UPDRS Part III (Motor Examination) scoreBaseline to Week 24The MDS-UPDRS Part III (Motor Examination) assesses the motor function of patients with Parkinson's disease. The total score ranges from 0 to 132, with higher scores indicating greater motor impairment. The change from baseline to Week 24 will be analyzed to evaluate treatment efficacy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline to Week 24 in the MDS-UPDRS Part II (Activities of Daily Living) scoreBaseline to Week 24The MDS-UPDRS Part II evaluates the impact of Parkinson's disease on activities of daily living (ADL), such as speech, handwriting, dressing, and walking. The total score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating greater disability. The score change from baseline to Week 24 will be analyzed to assess treatment effectiveness on daily functioning.
Change from baseline to Week 24 in the MDS-UPDRS Part IV scoreBaseline to Week 24The MDS-UPDRS Part IV evaluates motor complications including dyskinesia and wearing-off phenomena. Changes in the score from baseline to Week 24 will be analyzed to assess treatment-related motor complications.
Change from baseline to Week 24 in the MDS-UPDRS Parts II and III total scoreBaseline to Week 24he MDS-UPDRS Part II assesses activities of daily living (maximum score: 52) and Part III assesses motor function (maximum score: 132). The combined total score (range: 0-184) reflects overall functional impairment, with higher scores indicating greater disability.
Change from baseline to Week 24 in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scoreBaseline to Week 24The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale is used by both investigators and participants to rate overall disease severity and clinical improvement. The score change from baseline to Week 24 will be used to assess perceived treatment effectiveness.
Change in modified Hoehn-Yahr stage from baseline to Week 24Baseline to Week 24The modified Hoehn-Yahr staging scale evaluates the severity and progression of Parkinson's disease, with higher stages indicating more advanced disease. Stage change from baseline to Week 24 will be used to assess disease progression or stability.
Change from baseline to Week 24 in the PDQ-39 summary index scoreBaseline to Week 24The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39) assesses health-related quality of life across 8 domains. The summary index score reflects the overall impact of Parkinson's disease on quality of life, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactYousheng Xiao, PhD
xys135@126.com+86-15177196935

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026