Skip to content

AZA+Lus VS AZA Monotherapy in HR-MDS

Azacitidine Plus Luspatercept Versus Azacitidine Monotherapy in Higher-risk Myelodysplastic Neoplasms: a Randomized Prospective Study

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06927232
Enrollment
86
Registered
2025-04-15
Start date
2025-04-30
Completion date
2027-01-31
Last updated
2025-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Higher-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Keywords

luspatercept, azacitidine, higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome

Brief summary

This study is a randomized, prospective, single-center, open-label cohort study involving untreated HR-MDS patients. The patients were divided randomized into AZA+Lus cohort and AZA monotherapy cohort.

Detailed description

The hypomethylating agents (HMA) azacitidine (AZA) and decitabine (DEC) have been shown to improve survival and delay disease progression in patients with high-risk MDS. They are recommended by the NCCN as first-line treatments for patients with high-risk MDS. Clinical trials have demonstrated an OR rate of approximately 40-50% with AZA in patients with high-risk MDS. Despite the efficacy of HMA therapy, the rate of transfusion independence remains low. Anemia remains the most prominent symptom in refractory patients, with very limited options for subsequent treatment. Prolonged anemia affects every organ function and seriously affects the prognosis of patients. Luspatercept is currently approved for the treatment of patients with both erythropoiesis receptor agonist ( ESA) treatment failures in transfusion-dependent low-risk MDS-RS patients. In a randomized controlled phase III clinical trial, compared to a placebo group, luspatercept significantly improved transfusion dependence and improved hemoglobin and quality of life in refractory MDS-RS patients. A recent conference report suggested that there was no significant difference in efficacy between low-risk and high-risk patients treated with luspatercept and that the HI rate for high-risk patients treated with luspatercept monotherapy was approximately 50%. Thus this study aimed to compare the efficacy of AZA+luspatercept and AZA monotherapy.

Interventions

DRUGAzacitidine (AZA)

Azacitidine 75mg/m/ day \*5 days, 28 days for 1 course

DRUGLuspatercept

Luspatercept 1.0 mg/kg subcutaneously every 3 weeks, adjusted according to hemoglobin, up to 1.75mg/kg. If hemoglobin ≥120g/L, luspatercept can be discontinued.

Sponsors

Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥18 years old * Diagnosed as higher-risk MDS (IPSS intermediate-2/high-risk, or IPSS-R \>3.5, or IPSS-M moderate high-, high-, very high-risk) * Untreated patients * Liver and kidney function less than 2 times of upper limit of normal * ECOG≤2 and expected survival more than 6 months * Informed consent signed

Exclusion criteria

* With active infection * Other malignant tumors * Obvious abnormal liver and kidney function, or abnormal function of other organs * Combined with myelofibrosis * Have undergone bone marrow transplantation * Pregnant or lactating women, or men who have recent reproductive needs * Allergic to azacytidine, Rotercept or excipients * History of polysorbate 80 allergy * Refuse to sign informed consent * Researchers consider it inappropriate to participate in the experiment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
overall response rate3 months, 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
rate of transfusion independence3 months, 6 months
adverse event ratethrough study completion, an average of 1 year
complete response rate3 months, 6 months
progress-free survivalthrough study completion, an average of 1 year
overall survivalthrough study completion, an average of 1 year
relapse ratethrough study completion, an average of 1 year

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026