Skip to content

Is Microlearning the Alternative in the Age of Hyperconnectivity

Is Microlearning the Alternative in the Age of Hyperconnectivity: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06926114
Enrollment
24
Registered
2025-04-13
Start date
2025-04-07
Completion date
2025-06-07
Last updated
2025-05-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Engagements and Motivation, Knowledge Acquisition

Keywords

Microlearning, Medical Education, Digital Natives, Hyperconnectivity, Spinal deformities

Brief summary

This Quasi-Experimental Study evaluated whether microlearning a strategy delivering brief, focused learning units enhances knowledge acquisition and retention among fifth-year medical students studying pediatric spinal deformities compared to a traditional block-format module. Methods: twenty-four students will be included into two groups. The microlearning group will receive sequential daily learning units over ten days, while the traditional group will engage in a comprehensive two-day self-learning module. Pretest, immediate post-test, and one-month post-intervention assessments will be performed using standardized MCQ and SAQ instruments. Learner engagement, time investment, and content clarity were additionally evaluated via structured surveys.

Interventions

DEVICEMicrolearning intervention

thirteen students will be included into the microlearning group will receive sequential daily learning units over ten days, . Pretest, immediate post-test, and one-month post-intervention assessments will be performed using standardized MCQ and SAQ instruments. Learner engagement, time investment, and content clarity will be additionally evaluated via structured surveys.

DEVICETraditional block-format module group

eleven students will be inclued into the self block module group will engage in a comprehensive two-day self-learning module. Pretest, immediate post-test, and one-month post-intervention assessments will be performed using standardized MCQ and SAQ instruments. Learner engagement, time investment, and content clarity will be additionally evaluated via structured surveys.

Sponsors

Faculty of Medicine, Sousse
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
24 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Currently enrolled fifth-year medical students Registered for the optional module in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Access to a personal computer, tablet, or smartphone with internet connectivity Ability to access the institutional Modular Object-Oriented Dynamic Learning Environment (Moodle) learning management system (LMS) Voluntary oral informed consent Commitment to complete both pre-assessment and post-assessment evaluations Willingness to participate in either learning modality (microlearning or traditional block-format) as determined by randomization

Exclusion criteria

Failure to complete the pretest assessment Non-completion of the pre and post-test assessment Withdrawal of consent at any point during the study Development of circumstances that would render continued participation burdensome to the participant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
knowledge acquisition : Short and long-term retentionImmediatly post intervention score and one month post intervention score and the difference between pre and immediate post intervention score

Countries

Tunisia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026