Skip to content

Effect of Standardized Lacrimal Sac Massage Compared With Probing for Congenital Lacrimal Duct Obstruction

Effect of Standardized Lacrimal Sac Massage Compared With Probing for Congenital Lacrimal Duct Obstruction: a Non-inferiority, Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06924723
Enrollment
160
Registered
2025-04-11
Start date
2025-05-01
Completion date
2026-01-01
Last updated
2025-04-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction

Brief summary

Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) is a common ophthalmic condition in children, presenting with tearing and pus overflow, with a prevalence of 5%-20% within 1 year of age. Although most cases resolve spontaneously within 1 year of age, some children require treatment. Lacrimal sac massage is a non-invasive, easy and cost-effective conservative treatment that helps to unblock the obstruction by increasing the pressure in the tear duct. Studies have shown that massage has a 93% cure rate in children under 8 months of age. In contrast, tear duct probing is effective but invasive and risky. In recent years, with the development of minimally invasive techniques, lacrimal sac massage has received renewed attention, and studies have shown its efficacy to be comparable to probing. However, there are problems of non-standardized massage timing and techniques in clinical practice, which affects the therapeutic efficacy. This study aims to assess whether the efficacy of standardized dacryocystic massage is not inferior to that of dacryocystorhinostomy through a randomized controlled trial, providing a reference for the treatment of CNLDO.

Interventions

PROCEDUREtear duct probing

In-office tear duct exploratory surgery was performed on the study participants, and the children were closely monitored for healing after the procedure. The children were closely monitored for healing afterward, and the patients were also examined at 1 week, 1 month, and 2 months after the start of treatment.

PROCEDURELacrimal sac massage

At the time of the visit, the patient's parents (one of them) were given Standardized tear duct massage (Crigler massage)Teaching and hands-on practice were performed, with the researcher confirming the standardization of movements.Subsequent massages were performed by the family member who received the training, and the child's family swiped the card to access the program.completed by the family member of the child, who scanned the code to enter the small program punch card group, according to the standardized process of massage (the frequency of massage was not less than 3 times/day, each time no less than 4 eight beats)And complete the punch card on time (each punch card interval should be greater than 2 hours).(each clock interval should be more than 2 hours).

Sponsors

Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Months to 1 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age from 3 months to 1 year; 2. Presence of at least one symptom of CNLDO (tear spillage, mucous discharge) in one or both eyes; 3. No surgical treatment for NLD (probing, balloon dilation, tube placement, DCR, etc.); 4. Can cooperate with the examination and subsequent follow-up; 5. Guardians agreed to be enrolled in the study and signed an informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

1. Combination of presenting infections of the conjunctiva and cornea; 2. Combination of other serious ocular surface and intraocular disorders that may affect the therapeutic effect; 3. Congenital malformation syndromes, developmental delays, facial anomalies, facial deformities; history of surgery or injury to the lacrimal duct, history of punctal occlusion, history of lacrimal fistula, history of congenital bulging of the lacrimal sac, history of acute dacryocystitis, history of severe blepharitis, and perinatal abnormalities such as preterm labor, low birth weight, and so on;

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment success of congenital tear duct obstruction at 3 months of treatmentAt 3 months of starting treatmentCure rate of congenital lacrimal obstruction at 3 months of treatment: patients with symptoms of lacrimal obstruction (tearing, pus overflow) disappeared are considered cured; lacrimal irrigation patency rate at 3 months of treatment (all lacrimal irrigation fluid goes into the throat, and no reflux is considered to be patency)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lacrimal flushing patency at 3 months after the start of treatmentat 3 months after the start of treatmentWhether the tear duct flushing is smooth
Incidence of complications during treatmentat 3 months after the start of treatmentCounting adverse events over the course of 3 months of treatment
Recurrence of symptoms within 1 month of cure1 month after cureObserve whether the patient has recurrence of tearing and pus overflow symptoms within 1 month after cure

Contacts

Primary ContactXuanwei Liang
liangxuanwei@163.com+8613694220662

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 15, 2026