Skip to content

Cancer of the Lung And SeneScencE - Prospective Cohort 1

Identification of Aging Biomarkers for Better Tailoring of Cancer Treatment in Older Patients With Lung Cancer: a Multicenter Clinico-biological Cohort Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06923618
Acronym
CLASSE-P1
Enrollment
385
Registered
2025-04-11
Start date
2025-07-09
Completion date
2032-07-31
Last updated
2025-12-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Keywords

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Aging biomarkers

Brief summary

The main objective is to identify and assess the predictive value of ageing and senescence biomarkers (methylome, telomeres, inflammageing) and senescent cells in tissues to improve prognosis assessment older patients with locally or locally-advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).

Detailed description

Geriatric assessment allows oncologists to stratify older cancer patients into risk categories (fit, vulnerable and frail) but few patients benefit from it. Yet, they do not evaluate physiological reserves when oncologists are in dire need of quantitative tools accounting for age-related changes. This decade has witnessed the remarkable power of multiple tools (epigenetics, telomere integrity, cellular and immunosenescence) to estimate an individual's age. These tools hold the potential for routine implementation in the clinic and to be combined with existing tests. The main objective is to identify and assess the predictive value of ageing and senescence biomarkers (methylome, telomeres, inflammageing) and senescent cells in tissues to improve to improve prognosis assessment in older patients with locally or locally-advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). The ambition of this study is to refine the prognosis assessment and optimize decision-making process, better anticipate adverse-events and unplanned hospitalization and better manage and care high risk patients of early death, unplanned hospitalization, major complication or toxicities and altered quality of life.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALBlood samples

Blood samples (5 ml) during surgery or within 3 days before.

Sponsors

ARC Foundation and Inserm
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin
CollaboratorOTHER
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
70 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients 70 years and over * Local or locally advanced (Clinic stage I-IIIA) NSCLC (clinically (or radiologically) suspected or histologically proven) * Surgical Curative Intent * Signed informed Consent (or signed by the curator or tutorship) * Affiliated to social security administrative care service

Exclusion criteria

* Synchronous cancer (histologically proven or strongly suspected non-lung cancer in the 6 months prior to inclusion (excluding basal cell cancer and prostate cancer with local treatment (radiotherapy or surgery) or active surveillance without systemic treatment (chemotherapy, hormone therapy)). * Subject deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision or patient under guardianship * Subject unable to understand the purpose and conditions of the study and unable to give consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Unplanned hospitalizations within 12 months12 months post surgeryNumber of unplanned hospitalizations within 12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Surgical ComplicationsMonth 3 and Month 6 post surgeryScores on the Clavien-Dindo Scale at Month 3 and Month 6
Major ToxicitiesMonth 3 and Month 6 post surgeryScores on the NCI-PRO-CTCA (National Cancer Institute Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) scale (Lickert scale with 5 levels/item) at Month 3 . A higher score means worse outcome.
Quality of Life Core 30Month 6 and Month 12 post surgery.Scores on the Quality of Life (QLQ) patients self-questionnaires Core 30 (0-100 points) at Month 6 and Month 12. A higher score means worse outcome.
Quality of Life Lung Cancer 13Month 6 and Month 12 post surgeryScores on the Quality of Life (QLQ) patients self-questionnaires Lung Cancer 13 (0-100 points) at Month 6 and Month 12. A higher score means worse outcome.
Mortality (all-cause) and cause-specificMonth 12 and Month 60 post surgeryNumber of death (all-cause) and cause-specific at Month12 and Month 60
Disease-free survivalMonth 3, Month 12 and Month 60 post surgeryDisease-free survival on imaging (CT scan) at Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 and Month 60
Geriatric Parameters G-CODEMonth 3 and Month 6 post surgeryScore on Geriatric-COre Data sEt (G-CODE) (0-17) at Month 3 and Month 6. A higher score means better outcome.
Geriatric Parameters Hand gripMonth 3 and Month 6 post surgeryScores on Hand grip (kg) at Month 3 and Month 6. A higher score means better outcome.
Quality of Life Elderly 14Month 6 and Month 12 post surgeryScores on the Quality of Life (QLQ) patients self-questionnaires Elderly 14 (0-100 points) at Month 6 and Month 12. A higher score means worse outcome.

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactFlorence CANOUÏ-POITRINE, PhD
florence.canoui-poitrine@aphp.fr01 49 81 36 74
Backup ContactAdèle BELLINO, Project advisor
adele.bellino@aphp.fr01 71 76 07 57

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026