Absorption, Energy Availability, Nutrition, Polyphenolic Compounds and Metabolism, Polyphenols Absorption Profile
Conditions
Keywords
Food structure, Cell walls, Macronutrients, Chickpeas, Bioactive compounds
Brief summary
The matrix of a food can significantly affect how well humans can absorb and use nutrients. Plants like fruits, vegetables, nuts, grains, and legumes have cell walls that form a network around their cells. These cell walls are a barrier for the digestive system to break down completely, which can make it harder to digest the food and get energy from it. This study will explore how the integrity of plant cell walls affects how well humans can absorb macronutrients (protein, fat and carbohydrates) and beneficial compounds e.g. phytochemicals. The study will compare two chickpea meals that have similar nutrients and energy content but differ in the amount of intact plant cell walls e.g. chickpea salad meal (INTACT diet) and chickpea burger meal (BROKEN diet).
Detailed description
The energy content of food can be in principle calculated by multiplying the content of each energy-yielding substrate by the corresponding heat of combustion. However, only part of this energy yielding substrates is converted to energy because of their incomplete digestion and absorption in the gastrointestinal tract. The structural composition of foods, known as the food matrix, significantly affects nutrient bioavailability. One such structural feature is the integrity of plant tissues characterised by the interconnected, continuous network of cell walls which surround and protect plant cells. When cellular integrity is retained, macronutrients are naturally encapsulated within cell walls which effectively reduces the rate and the extent of their digestibility by 6-7% compared to a diet poor in plant-based foods. This study aims to investigate the effect of plant tissue integrity on the total energy excretion of a diet, bioavailability of macronutrients and bioactive compounds, and on plasma levels of glucose, essential amino acids and triglycerides. The investigators will do this by comparing two diets which have (approximately) the same composition in macronutrients and energy but different levels of plant tissues integrity, namely a diet rich in intact plant tissues (INTACT diet), and a diet poor in such intact plant tissues (BROKEN diet). The investigators will use an ileostomy model to be able to determine the difference in energy excretion at the level of the terminal ileum.
Interventions
Salad meal containing intact chickpeas
Burger meal containing chickpea flour
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Randomised single-blind crossover trial
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Previously had an ileostomy * ≥1.5-years post-operative * Aged 18-60 years * Males and females (not currently pregnant/lactating) * Non-smokers * Not allergic to nuts and celery
Exclusion criteria
* Never had an ileostomy * \<1.5-year post-operative * Not aged 18-60 years * Pregnant/lactating female * Smokers * Allergic to nuts and celery
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Ileal fluid energy content | Change over 8 hours comparison between treatments | Energy content calculated by dry matter (g/100g dry basis) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Ileal fluid alkylresorcinol content | Change over 8 hours comparison between treatments | Measured by Mass Spec |
| Ileal fluid carotenoid content | Change over 8 hours comparison between treatments | Measured by Mass Spec |
| Circulating glucose concentration | Change over 8 hours comparison between treatments | Blood concentrations of glucose using glucometer |
| Urinary phenolic content | Change over 8 hours comparison between treatments | Phenolic concentration e.g. hippuric acid in urine |
| Circulating insulin, levels | Change over 8 hours comparison between treatments | Measured by ELISA in μg/mL. |
| Circulating essential amino acid levels | Change over 8 hours comparison between treatments | Blood concentrations of amino acids |
| Ileal fluid macronutrient content | Change over 8 hours comparison between treatments | Measured by dry matter (g/100g dry basis) |
| Circulating levels of GLP-1 | Change over 8 hours comparison between treatments | Measured by ELISA in μg/mL. |
| Circulating levels of GIP | Change over 8 hours comparison between treatments | Measured by ELISA in μg/mL. |
| Circulating levels of ghrelin | Change over 8 hours comparison between treatments | Measured by ELISA in μg/mL. |
| Circulating levels of CKK | Change over 8 hours comparison between treatments | Measured by ELISA in μg/mL. |
| Circulating levels of leptin | Change over 8 hours comparison between treatments | Measured by ELISA in μg/mL. |
| Circulating levels of bioactive peptides | Change over 8 hours comparison between treatments | Blood concentrations of legume bioactives |
| Circulating triglyceride levels | Change over 8 hours comparison between treatments | — |
Countries
United Kingdom