Skip to content

Bioavailability From Chickpea Meals in Ileostomists?

Bioavailability of Macronutrients and Bioactive Compounds From Chickpea Meals: an Ileostomy Study.

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06921811
Enrollment
28
Registered
2025-04-10
Start date
2025-04-01
Completion date
2026-03-31
Last updated
2025-04-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Absorption, Energy Availability, Nutrition, Polyphenolic Compounds and Metabolism, Polyphenols Absorption Profile

Keywords

Food structure, Cell walls, Macronutrients, Chickpeas, Bioactive compounds

Brief summary

The matrix of a food can significantly affect how well humans can absorb and use nutrients. Plants like fruits, vegetables, nuts, grains, and legumes have cell walls that form a network around their cells. These cell walls are a barrier for the digestive system to break down completely, which can make it harder to digest the food and get energy from it. This study will explore how the integrity of plant cell walls affects how well humans can absorb macronutrients (protein, fat and carbohydrates) and beneficial compounds e.g. phytochemicals. The study will compare two chickpea meals that have similar nutrients and energy content but differ in the amount of intact plant cell walls e.g. chickpea salad meal (INTACT diet) and chickpea burger meal (BROKEN diet).

Detailed description

The energy content of food can be in principle calculated by multiplying the content of each energy-yielding substrate by the corresponding heat of combustion. However, only part of this energy yielding substrates is converted to energy because of their incomplete digestion and absorption in the gastrointestinal tract. The structural composition of foods, known as the food matrix, significantly affects nutrient bioavailability. One such structural feature is the integrity of plant tissues characterised by the interconnected, continuous network of cell walls which surround and protect plant cells. When cellular integrity is retained, macronutrients are naturally encapsulated within cell walls which effectively reduces the rate and the extent of their digestibility by 6-7% compared to a diet poor in plant-based foods. This study aims to investigate the effect of plant tissue integrity on the total energy excretion of a diet, bioavailability of macronutrients and bioactive compounds, and on plasma levels of glucose, essential amino acids and triglycerides. The investigators will do this by comparing two diets which have (approximately) the same composition in macronutrients and energy but different levels of plant tissues integrity, namely a diet rich in intact plant tissues (INTACT diet), and a diet poor in such intact plant tissues (BROKEN diet). The investigators will use an ileostomy model to be able to determine the difference in energy excretion at the level of the terminal ileum.

Interventions

OTHERIntact chickpeas

Salad meal containing intact chickpeas

OTHERBroken chickpeas

Burger meal containing chickpea flour

Sponsors

Wageningen University and Research
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Ulster
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

Randomised single-blind crossover trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Previously had an ileostomy * ≥1.5-years post-operative * Aged 18-60 years * Males and females (not currently pregnant/lactating) * Non-smokers * Not allergic to nuts and celery

Exclusion criteria

* Never had an ileostomy * \<1.5-year post-operative * Not aged 18-60 years * Pregnant/lactating female * Smokers * Allergic to nuts and celery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ileal fluid energy contentChange over 8 hours comparison between treatmentsEnergy content calculated by dry matter (g/100g dry basis)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ileal fluid alkylresorcinol contentChange over 8 hours comparison between treatmentsMeasured by Mass Spec
Ileal fluid carotenoid contentChange over 8 hours comparison between treatmentsMeasured by Mass Spec
Circulating glucose concentrationChange over 8 hours comparison between treatmentsBlood concentrations of glucose using glucometer
Urinary phenolic contentChange over 8 hours comparison between treatmentsPhenolic concentration e.g. hippuric acid in urine
Circulating insulin, levelsChange over 8 hours comparison between treatmentsMeasured by ELISA in μg/mL.
Circulating essential amino acid levelsChange over 8 hours comparison between treatmentsBlood concentrations of amino acids
Ileal fluid macronutrient contentChange over 8 hours comparison between treatmentsMeasured by dry matter (g/100g dry basis)
Circulating levels of GLP-1Change over 8 hours comparison between treatmentsMeasured by ELISA in μg/mL.
Circulating levels of GIPChange over 8 hours comparison between treatmentsMeasured by ELISA in μg/mL.
Circulating levels of ghrelinChange over 8 hours comparison between treatmentsMeasured by ELISA in μg/mL.
Circulating levels of CKKChange over 8 hours comparison between treatmentsMeasured by ELISA in μg/mL.
Circulating levels of leptinChange over 8 hours comparison between treatmentsMeasured by ELISA in μg/mL.
Circulating levels of bioactive peptidesChange over 8 hours comparison between treatmentsBlood concentrations of legume bioactives
Circulating triglyceride levelsChange over 8 hours comparison between treatments

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026