Skip to content

Interest of a Musical Intervention on Stress Induced During Botulinum Toxin Injections in Spasticity (MUSIBOT)

Interest of a Musical Intervention on Stress Induced During Botulinum Toxin Injections in Spasticity

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06920524
Acronym
MUSIBOT
Enrollment
80
Registered
2025-04-09
Start date
2025-04-25
Completion date
2027-10-30
Last updated
2025-05-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Head Trauma Injury, Multiple Sclerosis, Spinal Cord Injury, Stroke

Keywords

Musical intervention, Pain Management, stress, Botulinum toxin

Brief summary

Botulinum toxin (BT) injections are a painful treatment frequently used to treat spasticity following central neurological damage (stroke, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, head trauma). Tolerance of injections varies from patient to patient. For most patients, the pain experienced during the injection is a major source of stress. Numerous clinical trials have demonstrated the role of music therapy in pain management. Music therapy uses a U shaped technique, allowing the patient to relax in different phases. This system has demonstrated beneficial effects on pain and anxiety in various fields, such as chronic and acute pain, Alzheimer's disease, fibromyalgia and neurological pain. Given the painful nature of spasticity and anxiety treatment, we aim to use a musical intervention to help patients cope better with injections. The primary objective of the study is to investigate the effect of exposure to a musical intervention session during botulinum toxin injections, on injection-induced stress (heart rate variability). Secondary objectives: To study the effect of exposure to a musical intervention session during botulinum toxin injections, during the visit to injections #1, in terms of: * Injection-induced stress for HRV parameters other than LF/HF * Injection-induced pain * Injection anxiety * Patient satisfaction * Effect of musical intervention on the medical procedure performed (botulinum toxin injections) expressed by the doctor at the end of the session. To study the effect of exposure to a musical intervention session, during injections visit n°2, in order to evaluate the effect of repeated exposure to a musical intervention session, in terms of : * Injection-induced stress for HRV parameters other than LF/HF * Injection-induced pain * Injection anxiety * Patient satisfaction * Effect of musical intervention on the medical procedure performed (botulinum toxin injections) expressed by the physician at the end of the session. The hypothesis of this research is that a responsive musical intervention can, in adults, reduce the stress induced by botulinum toxin injections. Patients will be selected from the cohort of patients regularly treated for botulinum toxin injections in the Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (PRM) department at Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital. Botulinum toxin injections will take place in the PRM department. Each patient will participate in the study for a maximum of 4 months. This study will be carried out in patients receiving regular botulinum toxin injections to treat spasticity. The first injection will be given with (IM-IM) or without musical intervention (CT-IM), depending on the randomization group, followed by the next injection with musical intervention. Patients will be able to choose the style of music (Jazz, Classical, Electronic, R&B, Ambient, Rock, etc.) that appeals to them in order to benefit from a minimum 20-minute session of musical intervention (duration varying according to the number of injections to be performed).

Interventions

DEVICEIntervention group IM-IM

The intervention group (IM-IM) will receive a tablet and headphones to listen to music during the toxin injections. Then, during the waiting time, the patient, with or without assistance, will choose the music they wish to listen to, according to their musical tastes. The duration of the music can be modulated according to the duration of the medical procedure to follow.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

At the first visit, consent will be obtained from the patient or guardian, followed by data collection (age, sex, pathology, date of first injection). Randomization will take place after this stage. All injections will follow the same protocol (tracking technique, MYOBOT 26G needle, ice analgesia on request). A Polar H10 heart rate monitor will measure the stress induced by the medical procedure. Before the injection, the patient will complete the STAI-Y1 anxiety questionnaire.The control group (CT-IM) will receive only the heart rate monitor, and will receive injections as usual. The intervention group (IM-IM) will be provided with a tablet and headphones to listen to selected music before the injection. At the end, all patients will rate their pain (VAS 0-10), anxiety (STAI-Y1) and satisfaction. Their perception of time will be compared with the actual duration of the medical procedure.At the second visit (M3±1 month), all patients will have access to music before the injection.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients, male or female, suffering from spasticity of neurological origin (multiple sclerosis, stroke, head trauma, etc.) and eligible for botulinum toxin injection treatments. * Patients with known pain and/or anxiety * Able to give informed consent to participate in research * Enrolled in a French Social Security system

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindication to musical intervention (severe hearing impairment, unstabilized psychotic disorders, history of auditory trauma) * Major cognitive impairment * Any medical condition deemed by the investigator to be incompatible with the research. * Indication for MEOPA sedation during botulinum toxin injection sessions * Medication or medical conditions likely to interfere with heart rate variability during the study: beta-blockers, anti-arrhythmics, anxiolytics, benzodiazepines, anti-hypertensives and calcium antagonists. * Pregnant or breast-feeding women * Refusal to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
StressBaselinePatient stress, assessed during injection visit no. 1, estimated by the variation in heart rate variability (HRV), measured before and during the botulinum toxin injection session with the LF (sympathic activity)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intensity of painBaseline and 3 monthsThe intensity of pain experienced by the patient during the botulinum toxin injection session, during visits to injections n°1 and n°2, measured by a simple numerical scale (ENS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst pain imaginable) immediately after the end of the session.
Variation of anxietyBaseline and 3 monthsMeasurement of the variation in anxiety measured using the State Trait Anxiety Inventory-form Y Etat (STAI-Y1) self-questionnaire, during injection visits n°1 and n°2, before and after botulinum toxin injections. The STAI-Y1 questionnaire consists of 20 questions, measured on a Likert scale ranging from 1- Not at all to 4-Very much so.
Stress3 monthsPatient stress during injection visit no. 2, estimated by the variation in heart rate variability (HRV), measured before and during the botulinum toxin injection session with the parameter LF/HF.
Patient satisfaction with the procedureBaseline and 3 monthsPatient satisfaction with the procedure assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 - no satisfaction to 10 - highest satisfaction measured after the injections, during injection visits n°1 and n°2.
Quality of the conditions under which botulinum toxin injectionsBaseline and 3 monthsThe quality of the conditions under which botulinum toxin injections were performed, as assessed by the doctor immediately after the end of the session for injections n°1 and n°2 \[using a simple numerical scale (ENS) ranging from 0 (extremely poor conditions) to 10 (extremely good conditions)\].
Measurement of perception of session timeBaseline and 3 monthsMeasurement of perception of session time in relation to actual injection time at injection visits n°1 and n°2. Declarative data collected at the end of the session during the various visits.

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactLise Laclautre
promo_interne_drci@chu-clermontferrand.fr+33473754963

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026