Skip to content

Ethyl Chloride Spray to Reduce Pain From Local Anesthesia During Mohs Micrographic Surgery

Ethyl Chloride Spray to Reduce Pain From Local Anesthesia During Mohs Micrographic Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06920381
Enrollment
77
Registered
2025-04-09
Start date
2025-06-01
Completion date
2026-03-05
Last updated
2026-07-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Surgery

Keywords

Mohs micrographic surgery, Ethyl Chloride Spray

Brief summary

Fear of needles is a well-documented issue that affects many patients. This fear may cause significant anxiety in various medical situations, including in the dermatology office 1. If not properly managed, needle phobia can persist, affecting a patient's experience during each visit. This effect may compound and lead to avoidance behaviors that can delay necessary treatments 2. This issue is particularly relevant in a Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) clinic where each patient experiences several painful needle injections before the day is over. Ethyl chloride is gaining popularity among dermatologists for its routine use in clinical practice due to its anesthetic and antiseptic properties, especially as a pre-injection agent. Research indicates that cryotherapy or pre-cooling the skin before administering a local anesthetic may offer benefits over topical anesthetics, such as enhanced pain relief, quicker onset, and better patient compliance 3,4. However, to our knowledge, no studies have specifically examined the effectiveness of pre-cooling with ethyl chloride prior to Mohs micrographic surgery. To address this gap, we're conducting a trial aimed at evaluating the impact of pre-cooling with ethyl chloride on pain perception in adult patients undergoing Mohs micrographic surgery with local anesthetic injections. The trial is a single-center, split-body study. The split-body design will involve dividing the surgical site into two equal halves, with one half (right side relative to patient) designated as the treatment side (receiving ethyl chloride spray prior to lidocaine injection) and the other as the control side (no ethyl chloride spray prior to injection). During the procedure, the participant will be asked to rate the pain associated with the needle injection AND the pain from infiltration of anesthetic from each side of the wound using the visual analog scale (VAS) scoring system (1 = no pain, 10 = most amount of pain possible). The results of the study will help us better understand how to mitigate pain and anxiety for patients requiring MMS.

Interventions

DRUGGebauer's Ethyl Chloride Topical Spray

Prior to injection of lidocaine, the investigator will apply ethyl chloride spray, Gebauer's Ethyl Chloride Topical Spray, continuously for 4 to 10 seconds until the skin turns white. This application will be done from a distance of 8 to 18 cm (3 to 7 inches) to the right side of the tumor lesion.

Sponsors

University of California, Davis
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This is a single-center, split-body study. The split-body design will involve dividing the surgical site into two equal halves, with one half (right side relative to patient) designated as the treatment side (receiving ethyl chloride spray prior to lidocaine injection) and the other as the control side (no ethyl chloride spray prior to injection).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients scheduled for MMS with Dr. Daniel Eisen at UC Davis Health Department of Dermatology (3301 C St #1300-1400, Sacramento, CA 95816) * Pre-op tumor size at least 1.5 cm (measured on day of procedure)

Exclusion criteria

* Skin disorders related to cold temperatures (i.e. cryoglobulinemia) * Anxiolytic medication within past 4 hours * Treatment sites around the eyes * Pre-op tumor size smaller than 1.5 cm (measured on day of procedure)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
VAS pain scoresDuring the MMS procedureThe primary outcome measure will be the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores recorded at the time of the initial injection and during the infiltration of anesthetic for each treatment side. Patients will self-report their VAS score from a scale of 0-10. VAS scores will be sorted into 4 categories: 0 = no pain; 1-3 = mild pain; 4-6 = moderate pain; 7-10 = severe pain.
Subject response to "do you prefer precooling with ethyl chloride spray in future Mohs surgery cases?"Immediately after the MMS procedureSecondary outcome measure will be study subject's responses to the question: "do you prefer precooling with ethyl chloride spray in future Mohs surgery cases?".

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 7, 2026