Skip to content

Attitudes to Gynae Oncology Care Location - GRACEFUL

Investigating Attitudes to Gynaecological Rapid Access, Cancer Exclusion and Follow Up Location (GRACEFUL Study)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06920342
Acronym
GRACEFUL
Enrollment
600
Registered
2025-04-09
Start date
2025-03-24
Completion date
2029-02-02
Last updated
2025-04-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gynecologic Cancers

Brief summary

Gynaecological oncology (cancer) place of care is often based on evolution of services, along historical professional boundaries, rather than user needs or preferences. The investigators aim to gather views of patients in the United Kingdom (UK) on their preferred place of care for investigation, treatment and follow-up of gynaecological cancer. An initial scoping review found no previous work in this area. Pilot work, performed to inform local re-organisation of services, found that 53% of participants were somewhat or very unhappy to have care co-located with O&G services. Specifically, two key themes were identified through content analysis of free-text comments: environment and getting this right is vital; and our cancer should be the priority. However, via a BGCS survey, the investigator found that healthcare professionals (HCPs) underestimated strong patient preferences. Of those who see patients within O&G services, only 50% said patients were seen at separate times/locations from obstetric patients. The investigators want to expand on these pilot data to better understand how to design services that better meet our patients' needs. The investigators will conduct a survey to ascertain service users' attitudes to location of services, collecting quantitative data & qualitative data, including opportunities for feedback in free text. The investigator will conduct analysis using standard statistical methods & content analysis of free-text responses. Submissions will be anonymous & no identifiable data will be collected routinely, unless volunteered by the respondent. The investigator will ask a subset of \ 30 participants to undertake a telephone/virtual-based semi-structured interview to further explore understanding on attitudes to location of care more generally. A topic guide will be developed, informed by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Interviews will be audio-recorded with consent, transcribed verbatim & anonymised. The anonymised transcripts will be analysed using a form of Thematic Analysis. These findings should help to shape future health care service sensitive to patient need.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Somerset NHS Foundation Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- Female Aged 18 or over Able to give informed consent Have been referred to secondary care with a suspected gynaecological cancer, or have previously been diagnosed with a gynaecological malignancy

Exclusion criteria

\- Male Unable to give informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Graceful 15 yearsPatient-reported outcomes of acceptability of different clinic co-locations and the impact of different services.

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

Primary ContactDr Jo Morrison
jo.morrison@somersetft.nhs.uk+44 1823342562
Backup ContactFlo Cullen
Flo.Cullen@somersetft.nhs.uk+44 01823 342582

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026