Skip to content

Assessing Patient Satisfaction and Confidence After Use of Educational Video to Augment Surgical Consent for Thyroid Surgery

Assessing Patient Satisfaction and Confidence After Use of Educational Video to Augment Surgical Consent for Thyroid Surgery

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06918223
Acronym
TISCAV
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-04-09
Start date
2023-11-10
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2025-04-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Thyroid Cancer

Brief summary

This study looks at how a short educational video can help people better understand thyroid surgery. Patients who have thyroid nodules and need surgery will be part of the study. Some patients will get the usual information from their doctor, while others will also watch a video that explains the surgery in a simple and clear way. The study will check if the video helps patients feel more confident about their decision, lowers anxiety, and helps them remember important information about their surgery. Patients will answer surveys before surgery, after surgery, and 3 months later.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALThyroid Informed Surgical Consent Augmenting Video (TISCAV)

Participants randomized to the intervention group will receive a surgeon-created Thyroid Informed Surgical Consent Augmenting Video (TISCAV). This 8-minute video includes animated visuals and a surgeon voiceover explaining thyroid anatomy, surgical options (lobectomy vs. total thyroidectomy), risks, benefits, and expectations. The TISCAV was designed and reviewed by an endocrine surgery team to improve patient comprehension, confidence, satisfaction, and reduce decision regret compared to standard verbal consent alone.

Participants receiving the Standard Consent intervention will undergo the routine informed consent process for thyroid surgery provided by their surgeon. This process includes a verbal discussion covering thyroidectomy procedure details, potential risks and complications, benefits, alternatives such as active surveillance, and an opportunity to ask questions.

Sponsors

Thomas Jefferson University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Fluent in English * English is Primary Language * ≥18 years old at time of consent * Eligible for Thyroidectomy, lobectomy, isthmusectomy for any indication

Exclusion criteria

* History of prior thyroid surgery * Previously consented for thyroid surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient knowledge score using a 10-item internally validated Thyroid Surgery Knowledge AssessmentImmediately after study enrollment (pre-consent) and immediately following the surgical consent process (post-consent)This outcome measures patient knowledge of thyroid surgery, including indications, procedural options, risks, and benefits. A 10-question internally developed and validated multiple-choice questionnaire will be administered before and after the informed consent process. Each correct answer is scored as 1 point, with a total score ranging from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate greater understanding and retention of surgical information.
Decisional Conflict Score using the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS)Preoperatively (after the consent process and before surgery)This outcome measures patient uncertainty and confidence related to thyroid surgery decision-making using the validated 16-item Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS). The DCS evaluates five subdomains: uncertainty, feeling informed, values clarity, support, and perceived effectiveness of the decision. Each item is scored from 0 (strongly agree) to 4 (strongly disagree), then standardized to a total score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores reflect greater decisional conflict and more difficulty with making a decision.
Satisfaction with Decision Score using the Satisfaction with Decision Scale (SDS)Immediately after consent (Preoperative), Postoperative Day 22, and Postoperative Day 100This outcome assesses patient satisfaction with their decision to undergo thyroid surgery using the validated 6-item Satisfaction with Decision Scale (SDS). Each item is scored from 1 (not satisfied) to 5 (very satisfied), with a total score ranging from 6 to 30. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with the decision-making process and outcome.
Decision Regret Score using the Decision Regret Scale (DRS)Postoperative Day 22 and Postoperative Day 100This outcome evaluates postoperative regret related to undergoing thyroid surgery using the validated 5-item Decision Regret Scale (DRS). Each item is scored from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree), with scores converted to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores reflect greater decision regret.
Anxiety Score using the Visual Analog Scale for Anxiety (VAS-A)Immediately after consent (Preoperative), Postoperative Day 22, and Postoperative Day 100This outcome measures patients' current level of anxiety using the validated Visual Analog Scale for Anxiety (VAS-A), a single-item scale presented as a 100 mm line ranging from calm to anxious. Participants place a mark on the scale reflecting their current state. The score is recorded as a number from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety.

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactAnnie Moroco Assistant Professor, MD
Annie.Moroco@jefferson.edu215-955-6826
Backup ContactHani Research Fellow, BS
hxs597@jefferson.edu3216091134

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026