Skip to content

Comparing HILT, Steroid Injection, and Manual Therapy for Frozen Shoulder

Comparative Effectiveness of High-Intensity Laser Therapy Versus Corticosteroid Injection Versus Manual Therapy, Each Combined With Standard Exercise, for Frozen Shoulder (Adhesive Capsulitis): A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06916650
Enrollment
180
Registered
2025-04-08
Start date
2025-04-25
Completion date
2027-08-01
Last updated
2025-04-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Frozen Shoulder

Brief summary

This study compares three common treatments for frozen shoulder when added to a standard exercise program: High-Intensity Laser Therapy (HILT), a corticosteroid (steroid) injection into the shoulder joint, and hands-on manual therapy by a physical therapist. A fourth group will receive only the standard exercise program. The goal is to see which combination works best to reduce shoulder pain and improve shoulder function over 6 months. The main outcomes are changes in pain (VAS scale) and shoulder disability (SPADI questionnaire) at 12 weeks.

Interventions

Nd:YAG laser (1064 nm) applied to anterior, lateral, posterior glenohumeral joint aspects. Three-phase protocol per session: (1) 10 J/cm² @ 10 Hz; (2) 12 J/cm² @ 2000 Hz; (3) 10 J/cm² @ 15 Hz. Total energy \ 1200 J/session. Frequency: 2 sessions/week for 6 weeks (12 sessions total). Delivered by trained PTs.

DRUGUltrasound-Guided Intra-articular Corticosteroid Injection

Single injection into the glenohumeral joint under ultrasound guidance. Consists of 40 mg methylprednisolone acetate combined with 4 ml of 1% lidocaine hydrochloride. Delivered at baseline by an experienced orthopedic physician.

BEHAVIORALManual Therapy

Skilled hands-on techniques including glenohumeral joint mobilizations (Maitland grades III-IV), posterior capsule stretching, scapular mobilization, and soft tissue techniques targeting restricted tissues. Session duration: \ 30 minutes. Frequency: 2 sessions/week for 6 weeks (12 sessions total). Delivered by PTs specialized in manual therapy.

Standardized program including pendulum exercises, active-assisted range of motion exercises (e.g., wand, wall climbs), stretching (e.g., cross-body, sleeper stretch), and progressive resistive exercises using resistance bands. Includes supervised instruction/progression and a daily home exercise program component. Supervised instruction frequency: 2 sessions/week for first 6 weeks, then 1 session/week for next 6 weeks (total 18 supervised sessions over 12 weeks). Delivered by trained PTs.

Sponsors

Al Hayah University In Cairo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Age between 40 and 70 years, inclusive. Clinical diagnosis of primary (idiopathic) frozen shoulder, defined by shoulder pain and ≥50% restriction in passive external rotation compared to the contralateral (unaffected) shoulder. Symptom duration between 3 and 9 months. Average shoulder pain intensity ≥ 4 on a 10-cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) over the past week. Normal or age-appropriate radiographic findings of the glenohumeral joint (ruling out significant arthritis, fractures, calcific tendinitis). Willingness and ability to attend scheduled treatment/assessment sessions. Ability to understand study procedures and provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Secondary frozen shoulder (e.g., post-traumatic, post-surgical, related to systemic disease like diabetes - clarify if diabetes is excluded or just secondary FS from diabetes). Clinical or imaging evidence of significant rotator cuff tear requiring specific management. Radiographic evidence of moderate to severe glenohumeral osteoarthritis (e.g., Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥ 3). Previous surgery on the index shoulder. Significant neurological disorders affecting shoulder or upper extremity function (e.g., cervical radiculopathy, stroke). Received a corticosteroid injection in the index shoulder within the past 3 months. Known contraindications to corticosteroid injections (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, allergy, local infection). Known contraindications to High-Intensity Laser Therapy (e.g., active malignancy in the treatment area, photosensitivity, pacemaker over treatment area). Current participation in another interventional clinical trial for shoulder pain.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Shoulder Pain IntensityBaseline (T0), 6 weeks (T1), 12 weeks (T2), 6 months (T3)Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Pain. Change from baseline in average shoulder pain over the past week, measured on a 10 cm horizontal VAS, where 0 cm = no pain and 10 cm = worst imaginable pain. Lower scores indicate less pain. MCID estimated at 1.4 cm.
Change in Shoulder Pain and DisabilityBaseline (T0), 6 weeks (T1), 12 weeks (T2), 6 months (T3)Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). Change from baseline in the total SPADI score. SPADI consists of 13 items assessing pain (5 items) and disability (8 items). Total score ranges from 0-100, with lower scores indicating less pain and disability.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Passive Shoulder Range of Motion (ROM)Baseline (T0), 6 weeks (T1), 12 weeks (T2), 6 months (T3)Change from baseline in passive shoulder ROM measured in degrees for: External Rotation (at side), Abduction (in scapular plane), Flexion, and Internal Rotation (vertebral level reached). Measured using a standard goniometer.
Patient Global Rating of Change6 weeks (T1), 12 weeks (T2), 6 months (T3)Global Rating of Change (GRC) Scale. Patient's self-rated overall change in their shoulder condition since starting the study, measured on a Likert scale (e.g., 7-point scale from very much worse to very much improved). Assessed relative to baseline.
Incidence of Adverse EventsThroughout study participation (up to 6 months)Number, type, and severity of any adverse events (AEs) reported by participants or observed by study staff throughout the study duration, categorized by potential relationship to the assigned intervention (e.g., post-injection flare, skin reaction to HILT, increased pain after manual therapy/exercise).

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactIbrahim Zoheiry, Ph.D
ibrahim.alzoheiry@hotmail.com01277774949
Backup ContactMohamed ElMeligie, Ph.D
mohamed.elmeligie@ahuc.edu.eg

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026