Skip to content

Memantine as an Additive Therapy in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury

Memantine as an Additive Therapy in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06914310
Enrollment
80
Registered
2025-04-06
Start date
2025-03-25
Completion date
2025-11-30
Last updated
2025-04-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)

Keywords

Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), Memantine, S100β

Brief summary

Memantine has shown promise in mitigating secondary brain injury in previous studies. One study demonstrated that early memantine administration in moderate TBI patients resulted in lower serum neuron-specific enolase levels and improved Glasgow Coma Scale scores. However, other trials investigating memantine's impact on long-term cognitive function in TBI patients have yielded mixed results. There is a need for well-controlled studies to determine the efficacy of memantine in improving neurological and cognitive outcomes in patients with TBI.

Detailed description

The current study aims to evaluate the cognitive function, neuroprotective effect, and S-100β serum level effect of Memantine in patients with mild to moderate traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients.

Interventions

DRUGMemantine

Memantine will be given either orally or through a nasogastric tube for 7 days, starting on the first day of admission to the hospital and then continued for 3 weeks. The memantine dose in the first 7 days is 30 mg twice daily, while during the remaining 3 weeks the dose is 10 mg twice daily

DRUGMannitol

Mild to moderate TBI patients will receive mannitol in case of brain edema to reduce brain swelling and analgesic for headache such as; acetaminophen.

Sponsors

Mansoura University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients between 18 and 70 years of age 2. Patients mild (GCS 13-15) to moderate (GCS 9-12) TBI were assessed for the study eligibility.

Exclusion criteria

1. Comorbid illnesses, such as diabetes mellitus, ischemic heart disease, acute myocardial infarction within the past 48 hours. 2. Acute or chronic renal insufficiency. 3. Hepatic diseases. 4. Autoimmune diseases. 5. Malignancies. 6. Pregnancy. 7. Patients unable to tolerate enteral feeding. 8. More than 24 hours (h) since traumatic injury

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The difference between the 2 groups regarding mean Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) scores at the end of treatment30 daysScore rage: 0 - 30. Normal cognition: 26 - 30, mild cognitive impairment: 18 - 25, moderate cognitive impairment: 10 - 17 and severe cognitive impairment: less than 10.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The differences between study groups in Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score.3 daysThe differences between study groups in GCS scores over 3 days. The score ranges from 3 (Minimum score = deep coma or death) to 15 (Maximum score = fully awake and oriented). Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is graded as mild, moderate, or severe on the basis of the level of consciousness or Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score after resuscitation. Mild TBI score ranges from 13 to 15, moderate TBI ranges from 9 to 13; while severe TBI ranges from 3 to 8.
The difference between the two study groups in mean serum level of S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B)3 daysThe difference between the two study groups in mean serum level of S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B) .

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026