Skip to content

Consensus-Based vs. Standardized Physiotherapy for Fibromyalgia

Efficacy of a Consensus-Based Physiotherapy Approach Compared to Standardized Usual Care for the Management of Fibromyalgia: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06913868
Enrollment
200
Registered
2025-04-06
Start date
2025-04-21
Completion date
2028-04-21
Last updated
2025-04-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain, Fibromyalgia

Brief summary

This study compares a new, consensus-based physiotherapy program to standard physiotherapy for people with fibromyalgia. The new program uses recommendations from experts, including education about pain, personalized exercise, and strategies to improve coping skills. We will measure how much pain people have, how well they can function, and their beliefs about pain. The goal is to see if the new program is better than standard care at reducing pain and improving function in individuals with fibromyalgia.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALConsensus-Based Physiotherapy Program

Physiotherapy for fibromyalgia (Baroni et al., 2023 Delphi consensus). Includes pain neuroscience education (PNE), tailored aerobic, strengthening, and sensorimotor exercises (graded exposure), and self-management strategies. 8-week program: 1-2 sessions/week (60 min) + home exercise (20 min, 3x/week). Therapist training and fidelity monitoring.Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE): Approximately 20 minutes per session, focusing on explaining the neurobiology of pain in fibromyalgia, emphasizing central sensitization mechanisms, and reconceptualizing pain as an output of the brain rather than solely a marker of tissue damage. PNE aims to reduce threat value associated with pain and improve understanding of pain fluctuations.

BEHAVIORALStandardized Physiotherapy Care

Standardized physiotherapy for fibromyalgia. Includes general exercise (aerobic, stretching), manual therapy (within guidelines), and basic pain education (excluding PNE). 8-week program: 1-2 sessions/week (60 min) + home exercise (20 min, 3x/week). Therapist training and fidelity monitoring.

Sponsors

Al Hayah University In Cairo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Age: Adults (≥ 18 years of age). Diagnosis: Diagnosis of fibromyalgia according to the 2016 Revisions to the 2010/2011 Fibromyalgia Diagnostic Criteria (This is the most current and recommended criteria). This requires: Widespread Pain Index (WPI) ≥ 7 and Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) score ≥ 5 OR WPI 3-6 and SSS score ≥ 9. Generalized pain, defined as pain in at least 4 of 5 regions (left upper, right upper, left lower, right lower, axial). Symptoms have been present at a similar level for at least 3 months. A diagnosis of fibromyalgia is valid irrespective of other diagnoses. A diagnosis of fibromyalgia does not exclude the presence of other clinically important illnesses. Pain Intensity: Average pain intensity of ≥ 4/10 on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) over the past week. (This ensures participants have clinically significant pain). Nociplastic Pain Features: CSI score ≥ 40. TSK score ≥ 37. Informed Consent: Willingness and ability to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Red Flags: Presence of red flags indicating serious underlying pathology that could mimic fibromyalgia or contraindicate exercise, such as: Unexplained weight loss. Fever or night sweats. Recent significant trauma. Neurological signs suggestive of spinal cord compression (e.g., bowel or bladder dysfunction, saddle anesthesia). Suspected malignancy. Acute inflammatory disease. Neurological Disorders: Significant neurological deficits (e.g., multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease) that would interfere with participation in the study or confound outcome assessment. Psychiatric Disorders: Uncontrolled or severe psychiatric disorders (e.g., active psychosis, severe major depression with suicidal ideation) that would preclude informed consent or adherence to the study protocol. Note: Mild to moderate, stable depression or anxiety, common in fibromyalgia, should not be an exclusion criterion. Overlapping Pain Conditions: Presence of other significant, active pain conditions that could confound the assessment of fibromyalgia-related pain and function, such as: Active inflammatory arthritis (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, lupus) requiring ongoing systemic treatment. Severe osteoarthritis requiring imminent joint replacement. Active, untreated neuropathic pain conditions (e.g., diabetic neuropathy, post-herpetic neuralgia). Note: Stable, well-managed comorbidities should not be exclusionary. Current Pain Management: Current participation in other pain management programs or interventions that specifically overlap with the study interventions (e.g., another structured physiotherapy program, cognitive behavioral therapy specifically for pain). Note: Patients on stable doses of pain medication should not be excluded. Exercise Contraindications: Inability to participate in exercise therapy due to medical conditions (e.g., severe cardiovascular disease, uncontrolled hypertension). Pregnancy: Current pregnancy or planning to become pregnant during the study period. (Pregnancy can affect pain perception and exercise tolerance). Medication Changes: Recent changes (within the past 4 weeks) in pain-related medications (e.g., opioids, antidepressants, anticonvulsants) or planned changes during the study period. Note: Stable medication regimens are acceptable. Litigation: Current involvement in litigation related to their fibromyalgia or chronic pain.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Pain Disability Index (PDI)Baseline, 8 weeks (post-intervention)The PDI is a self-report questionnaire that measures the impact of pain on seven domains of daily activities: family/home responsibilities, recreation, social activity, occupation, sexual behavior, self-care, and life-support activities. Each domain is rated on a scale of 0-10, with higher scores indicating greater disability. The total score ranges from 0-70. The change from baseline to 8 weeks will be the primary outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)Baseline, 8 weeks (post-intervention), 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-upThe NPRS is a single-item scale where patients rate their average pain intensity over the past week on a scale of 0-10, with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing worst imaginable pain.
Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ)Baseline, 8 weeks (post-intervention), 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-upThe PSEQ is a 10-item questionnaire that measures a patient's confidence in their ability to perform various activities despite their pain. Each item is rated on a scale of 0-6, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy. The total score ranges from 0-60.
Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK)Baseline, 8 weeks (post-intervention), 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-upThe TSK is a 17-item questionnaire that measures fear of movement and (re)injury. Items are rated on a 4-point scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree), with higher scores indicating greater kinesiophobia. The total score ranges from 17-68.
Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI)Baseline, 8 weeks (post-intervention), 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-upThe CSI is a 25-item questionnaire that measures the presence and severity of symptoms associated with central sensitization. Part A scores range from 0-100. Higher scores indicate a greater likelihood of central sensitization.
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)8 weeks (post-intervention), 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-upThe PGIC is a single-item scale asking patients to rate their overall improvement since the start of treatment. Patients choose from a 7-point scale: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, or very much worse.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactMohamed ElMeligie, Ph.D
mohamed.elmeligie@ahuc.edu.eg01159880001

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026