Aspiration, Feeding Difficulties, Gastrostomy
Conditions
Keywords
blenderized, bile acid, gastrostomy, aspiration
Brief summary
Using a longitudinal cohort design, we will compare the impact of a high BA-binding blenderized diet compared to a low BA-binding blenderized diet and an amino acid-based formula, on gastrointestinal and pulmonary hospitalization and emergency room visit rates over six months.
Interventions
amino acid formula for 6 months
low bile acid binding blenderized diet for 6 months
high bile acid binding blenderized diet for 6 months
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* receive at least 80% of their nutritional needs via gastrostomy * receive an International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative level 4 commercial blend, home blend or amino acid-based formula * receive their bolus feeds within 30 minutes or less.
Exclusion criteria
* have undergone anti-reflux surger * receive post-pyloric feeds * receive regular daily prophylactic antibiotics.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| total hospitalization and emergency room visits rates | 6 months | total hospitalization and emergency room visits rates between participants receiving H-BBB and those receiving L-BBB or an amino acid-based formula |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| differences in pulmonary, gastrointestinal or ICU admission rates | 6 months | differences in pulmonary, gastrointestinal or ICU admission rates between diets |
| differences in bile acid concentrations | 6 months | differences in bile acid concentrations between diets |
| correlations between microbial abundance and diversity and hospitalization and emergency room visit rates | 6 months | correlations between microbial abundance and diversity and hospitalization and emergency room visit rates |
| differences in metagenomic patterns between diets | 6 months | — |
| correlations between admission rates by diet type and short chain fatty acid concentrations | 6 months | — |