Skip to content

EBUS-TTFB vs EBUS-TBNA for Diagnosing Inadequate Lymph Node Specimens Based on MOSE

Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transtunnel Forceps Biopsy vs. Transbronchial Needle Aspiration for Diagnosing Inadequate Lymph Node Specimens Based on Macroscopic On-site Evaluation: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06913569
Enrollment
162
Registered
2025-04-06
Start date
2025-04-01
Completion date
2026-01-01
Last updated
2025-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lymphadenopathy

Brief summary

The study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transtunnel forceps biopsy to transbronchial needle aspiration in diagnosing inadequate lymph node specimens based on macroscopic on-site evaluation.

Detailed description

Mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy are common clinical conditions. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is the standard method recommended by guidelines for obtaining tissue from these patients. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial forceps biopsy (EBUS-TBFB) can overcome the limitations of inadequate tissue acquisition with EBUS-TBNA, and its efficacy and safety have been proved. However, EBUS-TBFB often requires the assistance of the electrocautery for mediastinal window creation, which increases technical difficulty and requires electrosurgical equipment, making it unsuitable for application in grassroots hospitals. This study aims to use the endobronchial ultrasound-guided transtunnel forceps biopsy (EBUS-TTFB) method. A single-use bronchoscopic puncture dilation catheter will be employed to establish a tunnel between the airway and the lymph node, with both puncture and dilation completed in the same procedure. Currently, there is a lack of prospective randomized controlled trials to verify the efficacy and safety of EBUS-TTFB. This study is designed as a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. A total of 162 patients will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the EBUS-TBNA group or the EBUS-TTFB group. The primary endpoint is thediagnostic yield. The secondary endpoints include specimen adequacy, procedure duration, tunnel creation success rate, and safety.

Interventions

PROCEDUREEBUS-TBNA

Participants with lymphadenopathy would receive EBUS-TBNA attempts to conduct diagnoses.

PROCEDUREEBUS-TTFB

Participants with lymphadenopathy would receive EBUS-TTFB attempts to conduct diagnoses.

Sponsors

Shanghai Chest Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ≥ 18 years; 2. Chest imaging shows mediastinal or hilar lymphadenopathy (short axis ≥10 mm), requiring EBUS-TBNA for definitive diagnosis; 3. EBUS-TBNA can be performed on these lymph nodes, and the specimens obtained from conventional EBUS-TBNA with three needle passes are inadequate (macroscopic visible core \< 30 mm); 4. Willing to participate in this clinical study and sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

1. Enlarged lymph nodes are identified as cystic or abscesses; 2. Severe coagulopathy, insufficient anticoagulants/antiplatelets withdraw time or bleeding diathesis (platelets\<50\*109/L, INR\>1.3) that do not meet bronchoscopy requirements; 3. Other contraindications to bronchoscopy or transbronchial biopsy, such as severe cardiopulmonary insufficiency, intolerance to anesthesia, or endoscopic procedures; 4. Patients who have participated in another clinical trial within the past three months; 5. Vulnerable groups, such as pregnant women 6. Any other condition that the investigator considers inappropriate for participation in this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic yieldSix months after the procedureThe diagnostic yield is defined as the proportion of lymph nodes diagnosed by each biopsy to the total number of lymph nodes enrolled in the study.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total procedure timeDuring the procedureThe total procedure time is defined as the time from the insertion of the bronchoscope to its removal.
TTFB procedure timeDuring the procedureThe EBUS-TTFB procedure time is defined as the time from the insertion of the biopsy needle into the bronchoscope to the cessation of bleeding after the final TTFB.
Sample adequacySix months after the procedureThe adequacy rate of samples for genetic testing: measured as the percentage of lymph node samples qualified for next-generation sequencing among all malignant lymph nodes.
Tunnel creation success rateDuring the procedureDefined as the percentage of lymph nodes in the EBUS-TTFB group where successful tunneling was achieved among the total number of lymph nodes.
Incidence of complicationsSix months after the procedureIncluding pneumothorax, infection, mediastinal hematoma, emphysema and etc.
TBNA procedure timeDuring the procedureThe EBUS-TBNA procedure time is defined as the time from the insertion of the biopsy needle into the bronchoscope to the cessation of bleeding after the final TBNA.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactJiayuan Sun, MD, PhD
xkyyjysun@163.com+86-021-22200000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026