Skip to content

Comparative Efficacy of Lipid Based Artificial Tears vs Aqueous Based Artificial Tears in Managing EDE

Comparative Efficacy of Lipid Based Artificial Tears vs Aqueous Based Artificial Tears in Managing EDE: A 6 Week RCT

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06913387
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-04-06
Start date
2025-03-20
Completion date
2026-02-20
Last updated
2025-07-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Evaporative Dry Eye

Brief summary

This research aimed to compare the effectiveness of a lipid-based artificial tear (Recuro) against an aqueous-based artificial tear (Softeal) in managing EDE symptoms and signs.

Detailed description

This prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted at Mughal Eye Hospital, Lahore. A sample size of 60 participants (30 per group) was determined using G\*Power. Participants (18-55 years, both genders) were assigned 1:1 to Recuro or Softeal for 6 weeks using block randomization (block size 4) generated by Research Randomizer. Primary outcomes included OSDI (Ocular Surface Disease Index) and SANDE (Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye) scores; secondary outcomes were Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT), Schirmer's test, and Meibomian gland expression.

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCTLipid Based Artificial Tears

30 participants received lipid-based artificial tears (Recuro) in this study arm. The intervention involved the administration of RECURO EYE DROPS, which contain Sodium carboxymethylcellulose 0.5%. Participants were instructed to instill 1-2 drops in each eye, three times daily (morning, afternoon, and evening) throughout the 6-week trial period.

COMBINATION_PRODUCTAqueous Based Artificial Tears

30 participants received aqueous-based artificial tears (Softeal) in this study arm. The intervention involved the administration of SOFTEAL EYE DROPS, which contain Hydroxypropylmethyl Cellulose 0.3%. Participants were instructed to instill 1-2 drops in each eye, three times daily (morning, afternoon, and evening) throughout the 6-week trial period.

Sponsors

Superior University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults (both genders) aged 18-55 years diagnosed with evaporative dry eye (EDE). * Willingness to adhere to the prescribed treatment regimen (lipid-based or aqueous-based artificial tears). * Include patients with a history of dry eye symptoms for at least 1-3 months. * Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score ≥13, indicating the presence of mild to severe dry eye symptoms. * Patients with tear break-up time (TBUT) \<10 seconds, indicating tear film instability.

Exclusion criteria

* Use of any topical ophthalmic medications (e.g., lubricants, anti-inflammatory drugs, or cyclosporine) for dry eye within the last 1 month. * Active ocular infection or inflammation (e.g., conjunctivitis, uveitis). * History of ocular surgery or trauma within the past 6 months. * Participants currently wearing contact lenses or those who have worn contact lenses in the past three months. * Systemic conditions known to impact ocular surface health, such as uncontrolled diabetes, autoimmune disorders, or Sjögren's syndrome.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)12 MonthsAssesses dry eye symptom frequency and impact on vision-related activities. Score ranges from 0-100. Scoring: 0-12 (Normal), 13-22 (Mild dry eye), 23-32 (Moderate dry eye), ≥ 33 (Severe dry eye).
SANDE Questionnaire (Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye)12 MonthsMeasures the frequency and severity of dry eye symptoms. Score ranges from 0-100. Scoring: Higher scores indicate more severe and frequent symptoms
Meibum Test Score12 MonthsThis score quantifies meibomian gland health and lipid secretion based on meibum quality and expressibility. It is derived from the assessment of 5 central glands in the lower eyelid. Scoring: Each assessed gland is scored from 0-3, resulting in a total Meibum Test Score for each eye ranging from 0-15. * Meibum Test Score Key (Per Gland): * 0: Clear meibum, no blockage (Healthy function) * 1: Cloudy meibum, mild dysfunction * 2: Thickened meibum, partial blockage * 3: No meibum expressed, severe obstruction * Interpretation: Lower total scores indicate healthier meibomian gland function and better meibum quality/expressibility.
Tear Break-up Time (TBUT): ( without anesthesia)12 monthsMeasures tear film stability by observing the time (in seconds) until the first dry spot appears on the cornea after blinking. Scoring: TBUT \<10 seconds is indicative of tear film instability and often associated with dry eye.
Schirmer Test I12 MonthsMeasures tear volume by assessing the length of wetting on a filter paper strip (in millimeters) after 5 minutes, without anesthesia. Scoring: ≥10 mm (Normal Tear Production), * 5-9 mm: Mild to Moderate Tear Deficiency (or decreased production), often associated with mild to moderate dry eye * \<5 mm: Severe Tear Deficiency (or significantly decreased production), indicative of severe dry eye

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026