Fibromyalgia
Conditions
Keywords
Fibromyalgia, self-knowledge, quality of life, Enneagram
Brief summary
The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the impact of self-knowledge training on the well-being of individuals with fibromyalgia. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does self-knowledge training improve participants' perceived quality of life? Does self-knowledge training influence the way participants manage their fibromyalgia symptoms? Participants will: Take part in a structured self-knowledge intervention based on the Enneagram framework. Complete validated questionnaires before and after the intervention to assess their well-being. Provide qualitative feedback on their experience with the training. This study will help understand whether self-awareness strategies can be integrated into non-pharmacological approaches for fibromyalgia management.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALSelf-Knowledge Training Program
The intervention consists of a self-knowledge training program based on the Enneagram framework. Participants attend 7 sessions, focusing on self-awareness, emotional regulation, and personal development. The sessions include theoretical explanations, guided self-reflection exercises, and group discussions to help participants better understand their personality patterns and how these influence their perception of pain and well-being.
Sponsors
University of Coimbra
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Diagnosis of fibromyalgia * Age ≥ 18 years * Ability to understand and provide informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* Cognitive impairment that prevents comprehension of the intervention
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Quality of Life (EQ-5D-3L) | Baseline and after completion of the 10-week intervention | The EQ-5D-3L is a generic instrument for assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL), comprising five dimensions: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension is rated on a 3-level scale (1 = no problems, 2 = moderate problems, 3 = severe problems). The responses generate a health index, where higher scores indicate worse quality of life. |
| Perceived Quality of Life (EQ-VAS) | Baseline and after completion of the 10-week intervention | The EQ-VAS is a visual analogue scale measuring self-perceived health status. Participants rate their health on a 0-100 scale (0 = worst imaginable health state, 100 = best imaginable health state). Higher scores indicate better perceived quality of life. |
| Mental Health - Depression, Anxiety, and Stress (DASS-21) | Baseline and after completion of the 10-week intervention | The DASS-21 is a 21-item questionnaire assessing symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress. It includes three subscales (7 items each), rated on a 0-3 scale (0 = does not apply at all, 3 = applies very much or most of the time). Higher scores indicate greater severity of symptoms. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Psychological Flexibility (Psy-Flex Scale) | Baseline and after completion of the 10-week intervention | The Psy-Flex Scale assesses psychological flexibility, a core construct in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT). It consists of six items, each representing a fundamental process of psychological flexibility. Responses are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very rarely, 5 = very frequently). Higher scores indicate greater psychological flexibility. |
| Self-Reflection and Insight (SRIS Scale) | Baseline and after completion of the 10-week intervention | The Self-Reflection and Insight Scale (SRIS) evaluates self-reflection and insight through three subscales: Engagement in Self-Reflection: Assesses the depth of cognitive and emotional self-examination. Need for Self-Reflection: Measures the individual's motivation for self-reflection. Insight: Evaluates the individual's level of self-awareness and understanding. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). Higher scores indicate greater self-reflection and insight. |
Countries
Portugal
Outcome results
None listed