Skip to content

To Evaluate Transport Safety Between Different Scanning Methods for Patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)

Comparative Safety Analysis: PET vs. CT Scans During Intensive Care Admission

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06912464
Acronym
CASA
Enrollment
208
Registered
2025-04-04
Start date
2025-04-01
Completion date
2027-04-01
Last updated
2025-04-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intensive Care Medicine, PET / CT, Transportation of Patients

Keywords

Intrahospital transport (IHT), Intensive Care Medicine, ICU, PET, PET/CT, Safety, CT

Brief summary

The goal of this study is to assess how safe it is for critically ill patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) to undergo a PET scan. A PET scan is a type of medical imaging used to help determine why a patient is sick. It is similar to a CT scan but involves a small amount of radioactivity to highlight areas of concern in the body. For a PET scan, patients need to be transported from the ICU to the scanning room, which can be risky because ICU patients are often very fragile. After a patient gets the PET scan injection, their body gives off a small amount of radiation for a short time. Because of this, doctors and nurses have to keep some distance to protect themselves. This means they keep an eye out for the patient from a bit further away than normal. This makes the procedure slightly riskier, especially for very sick patients. This study aims to answer the question: Is getting a PET scan riskier for ICU patients than a regular CT scan? All patients in this study will continue to receive their usual critical care. Researchers will closely monitor the scanning process to evaluate its safety. PET scans are already widely used to detect cancer, but new advancements may allow us to use them more often to diagnose infections. Before this can become routine practice, we need to ensure that PET scanning is just as safe as other commonly used imaging techniques. This study will assess all ICU patients undergoing a PET scan-regardless of the reason for the scan-to determine how safe the procedure is in critically ill individuals.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

University Medical Center Groningen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients receiving PET/CT during ICU admission (any indication) * Patients undergoing CT Thorax/Abdomen (matched cohort)

Exclusion criteria

* CT-scan for any acute indication (acute danger to vital parameters). * CT-Cerebrum * Registrion in the dutch Objection to medical research registry.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse EventsMeasured during the transport phase and 4 hours after return to the Intensive Care Unit.All adverse events associated with imaging procedures (PET and CT) This will encompass (amongst others) oxygen desaturation, bronchospasm, accidental extubation, hypo-/hypertension, cardiac arrest, malfunctioning medical devices, lack of necessary medication etc.) Timeframe: Start transport to PET/CT scanner and 4 hours hands-off time. We will score the noted adverse events in a grading scale adapted from the Clavien-Dindo classification that surgeons use to grade the severity of post-operative complications.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Employee dosimetryTransport and the hands-off time after scan (i.e. 4h in case of [18]FDG PET scanning)With regards to radiation protection all medical personnel involved in the (PET) procedure will wear electronic personal dosimetry device to ensure they fall into risk categories as outlined by law. Timeframe: Start at injection of radiopharmaceutical for 4 hours (=hands-off period)
Dietary Adjustment24-48 hours before scan procedure and until 24 hours after cessation of the diet.The effect of the application of dietary adjustments (Ketogenic diet or fasting) on patient safety. Evaluating the incidence of hypertriglyceridemia, pancreatitis and hypo-/hyperglykemia in both patient groups. Timeframe: Initiation of preparatory diet for PET-scan. Normally 24 hours - 48 hours before scan until 24 hours after cessation of the diet.
Kidney failure (KDIGO)Day of the scan and up to 3 days after the scan to evaluate the effect on kidney function (i.e. creatinine and urine creatinine will be measured 4 times and evaluated for significant alterations after the application of iodine contrast (if given))To evaluate the incidence of kidney failure when I.V. contrast is applied. Serum creatinine and 24 hours urine creatinine will be checked to estimate clearance

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Primary ContactCornelis Paul Van Stee, MD
fapi-ards@umcg.nl+31655256893
Backup ContactJanesh Pillay, MD, PhD

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026