Cirrhosis, Fragility, Hepatic Transplantation, Undernutrition
Conditions
Keywords
nutrition, Hepatic Transplantation, Cirrhosis
Brief summary
Cirrhosis is a major public health issue responsible for about 15000 deaths each year. Liver transplantation (LT) remains the only curative treatment for decompensated cirrhosis. Decompensated cirrhotic patients awaiting LT are malnourished, sarcopenic and fragile. The evaluation of the nutritional status of these patients is complex because the anthropometric data that define undernutrition (weight variation, BMI) are often compromised by the presence of edema and ascites related to liver disease. It therefore seems appropriate to focus on the fragility and sarcopenia of the cirrhotic patient as a reflection of the nutritional status. In 2017, the American team of Lai et al. validated a Liver fraily index (LFI) score of frailty specific to cirrhotic patients waiting for LT. The LFI is composed of three simple physical tests (Grip test, chair lift test, and balance tests) performed at the patient's bedside, which results in a quantitative and reproducible frailty score. Frailty while waiting for LT is associated with an increase in mortality on the waiting list, independently of the MELD (Model for End stage Liver disease) score, which is a reflection of liver severity. About half of the patients who are candidates for LT will present an aggravation of their frailty while waiting for LT. To date, no study has reported the results of a nutritional intervention on the evolution of fragility in patients awaiting LT. The objective of our study is to evaluate the impact of a nutritional management and follow-up by a dietitian specialized in hepatology on the fragility of patients waiting for LT. This is a monocentric study, randomized in two parallel groups (an intervention group with nutritional follow-ups by a trained dietitian and a control group with follow-up by the reference hepatologist without specific dietary management by a dietician) in open. All patients enrolled on the LT list with an LFI \> 3.2 (pre-frail and frail state) will be included in the study. It is planned to include 210 patients over a period of 24 months. The LFI will be measured for all patients (control group + intervention group) at 3 and 6 months, as part of their follow-up in the LT center. This study will also make it possible to correlate frailty with other parameters (severity of liver disease, access to LT).
Interventions
DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTDietary management
The intervention consists of a personalized dietary management with a nutritional follow-up pending transplantation. Teleconsultation appointments are scheduled with the dietician for dietary coaching and a re-evaluation of the nutritional strategy every month. Follow-up visits in person, carried out by the dietitian at the 3rd and 6th month waiting for transplant and are coupled with the usual consultations with the referring hepatologist. The visits allow the realization of LFI (Liver Frailty Index), the collection of interrelated events and the reassessment of hepatic disease as well as the re-evaluation of the nutritional strategy (CNO, enteral or parenteral nutrition)
OTHERNo dietary management
The patient will be followed up by his reference hepatologist every 3 months. Follow-up visits at 3 months and 6 months waiting for liver transplantation will be performed by Clinical Research assistant on the same day as the follow-up consultation with his hepatologist with the completion of the Liver Frailty Index test and the collection of intercurrent events and the reassessment of liver disease.
Sponsors
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
Prospective interventional, single-center, randomized, longitudinal study
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Patient aged ≥ 18 years * Patient registered on the waiting list for Hepatic Transplantation in the Transplantation center of the Croix Rousse Hospital (GHN), Hospices Civils de Lyon * Dated and signed an informed consent * Affiliated to a social security scheme or beneficiary of a similar scheme
Exclusion criteria
* Patient hospitalized in intensive care * Patient with initial LFI test result \< to 3.2, that is considered as robust. * Patient unable to perform LFI exercises (chronic or acute motor disability in lower or upper limbs) * Pregnant, parturient or lactating women * Persons deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative decision * Persons under psychiatric care * Persons admitted to a health or social institution for purposes other than research * Adults subject to a legal protection measure (guardianship, curatorship) * Inability to understand protocol information * Subject participating in another interventional research including an ongoing exclusion period at inclusion
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluate the impact at 3 months, of a nutritional management and follow-up by a dietitian specialized in hepatology compared to the usual management without dietary follow-up, on the fragility of patients waiting for liver transplantation (LT). | 3rd month after visit 1. | Measurement of LFI (Liver fraily index) score score variation between D0 (baseline = visit 1) and 3 months (first reassessment = visit 2) during the liver transplantation waiting period. This variation will be compared between the intervention group and the control group. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluate the impact of a nutritional follow-up on the distribution of patients' frailty according to classes: robust, pre-fragile, fragile | 3rd Month (M3) after Visit 1 and M6 after V1 | Compare the evolution of the fragility profile (Robust - Prefragile - Fragile) of patients waiting for liver transplantation according to LFI (Liver fraily index) at M3 and M6 in the intervention group and in the control, group compared with the initial LFI (D0) |
| Evaluate compliance with oral nutritional supplement treatment for patients awaiting transplant | 3rd Month and 6th month after Visit 1 | At each follow-up visit (M3 and M6) assessment of compliance with oral nutritional supplements for patients who were prescribed oral nutritional supplements, through questioning their intake: 0, 1⁄4, 1⁄2, 3⁄4 or all of the oral nutritional supplements consumed compared to the prescription. |
| Evaluate the relationship between fragility and severity of liver disease (MELD score) | Day 0, 3rd Month (M3) and 6th Month (M6) | Measure the correlation between LFI (Liver fraily index) at Day 0, M3 and M6 and the severity of liver disease (MELD score), |
| Evaluate the impact of a nutritional follow-up on the fragility of patients at 6 months on list | 6th Month after visit 1. | For patients still on the liver transplantation waiting list, comparison between the intervention and control group of the LFI (Liver fraily index) variation between Baseline (visit 1) and month 6 (visit 3). |
| Evaluate the relationship between fragility and mortality on waiting list of transplantation or leaving the list due to worsening | Day 0, 3rd month and 6th month | Measure the correlation between LFI (Liver fraily index) score at Day0, M3 and M6 and on-list mortality or leaving the list due to worsening |
| Evaluate the relationship between frailty and unscheduled hospitalizations while waiting for Liver Transplantation | Day 0, 3rd month and 6th month after Visit 1 | Measure the correlation with the LFI (Liver fraily index) score on Day 0, M3 and M6 and unscheduled hospitalizations awaiting transplant: numbers and indications (infections, encephalopathy, hemorrhage, etc.) |
| Evaluate the satisfaction of dieticians in carrying out nutritional monitoring for patients waiting for liver transplantation (logistics of organizing consultations and teleconsultations) | study completion at Month 30 | Evaluate the satisfaction of dieticians in carrying out nutritional monitoring for patients waiting for Liver Transplantation (logistics of organizing consultations and teleconsultations) via questionnary |
| Evaluate the relationship between fragility and access to a transplant | Day 0, Month 3 after Visit 1, Month 6 after Visit 1 | Measure the correlation between the LFI (Liver fraily index) score at Day 0, Month 3 and Month 6 and access to the transplant |
Countries
France
Contacts
Primary ContactMaxime PATUREL, Diététicien, FF CDS
Backup ContactMahutondji Calèbe SOMASSE
Outcome results
None listed