Deep Margin Elevation, Dental, Dental Caries, DME
Conditions
Keywords
Deep margin elevation
Brief summary
Deep marginal elevation usinge a bioactive dental material in deep subgingival Class II restorations, S-PRG filler-containing materials offer significant benefits due to their bioactive properties, Their ability to release fluoride, remineralization potential and acid neutralization, reducing the risk of recurrent caries, particularly at the gingival margin(Imazato et al. 2023). The antibacterial and antifungal effects help inhibit biofilm formation, enhancing the longevity of restorations. Additionally, these materials support better marginal adaptation by reducing microleakage and improving bond durability (Imazato et al. 2023) This type of composite may improve the outcomes of deep subgingival margin elevation, benefiting both restorative success and periodontal health(Imazato et al. 2023).
Interventions
OTHERAssigned Interventions
SDR Smart dentine replacement material nonbioactive
Sponsors
Future University in Egypt
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Adults patients (20-50) * Good oral hygiene (plaque index 0 or 1 ) * Patient approving to participate in the study * Absence of parafunctional habits and/or bruxism * No sign of irreversible pulpitis * No periapical radiolucency * Deep subgingival margin * Molars class II with subgingival margin
Exclusion criteria
* • Patients with known allergic or adverse reaction to the tested materials. * Systematic disease that may affect participation. * Xerostomic patients. * Bad oral hygiene (plaque index 2 or 3 ) * Heavy smokers * Patients undergoing or will start orthodontic treatment * Patients with removable prothesis
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Recurrent caries | T0: 1 Week Baseline T1: 6 Months T2: 12 Months | * 0: no evidence of caries continuous along the margin using periapical radiograph. * 1: caries evident continuous with the margin of restoration |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Fracture of Restoration | T0: 1 Week Baseline T1: 6 Months T2: 12 Months | * 1: Restoration is intact and fully retained. * 2:Restoration is partially retained with some portion of the restoration still intact. * 3:Restoration is completely missing |
| Post- operative sensitivity | T0: 1 Week Baseline T1: 6 Months T2: 12 Months | * 1: Absent * 2: Present |
| Bleeding on Probing | T0: 1 Week Baseline T1: 6 Months T2: 12 Months | * 0 :Healthy gums * 1 :Bleeding on probing |
Contacts
Primary ContactAHMED A Yakop, BDS
Outcome results
None listed