Skip to content

REgistry of Paclitaxel Coated Drug Eluting Balloon in All Comers PaTients

REgistry of Paclitaxel Coated Drug Eluting Balloon in All Comers PaTients (REPEAT Registry)

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06899555
Acronym
REPEAT
Enrollment
500
Registered
2025-03-28
Start date
2025-05-31
Completion date
2027-05-31
Last updated
2025-03-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

CAD - Coronary Artery Disease

Brief summary

A post marketing, observational , multi centre, prospective registry to assess safety and performance of the Drug Eluting Balloon in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Rational : Although DEBs are generally considered safe, there remain many unanswered questions about DEB technology in a real-world population and only limited trial data from geographically or clinically diverse patient subgroups. To address some of the clinical and translational gaps in knowledge we thus plan a clinical registry to assess safety and performance of a novel design of a drug eluting A real-world, all-comers coronary artery disease (CAD) population undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and suitable for treatment with a Paclitaxel Coated Coronary Balloon Dilatation Catheter. Study Population - 500 Patients

Detailed description

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a minimally invasive procedure treated as first line of treatment for symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD). In 1977, Gruentzig performed the first balloon percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) but this was associated with acute dissection or elastic recoil and later restenosis (re-narrowing). Bare metal stents (BMS) were developed which helped address acute dissection or recoil but only modestly decreased the risk of restenosis (which still occurred in around 25% of people within six months). Drug eluting stents (DES), coated with polymers which released drugs such as sirolimus or paclitaxel were then developed to reduce restenosis. Second-generation DES incorporating new metal platforms (changing from stainless steel to thinner strut metal alloys such as cobalt-chromium or platinum-chromium), new more biocompatible polymers, and new drugs such as Zotarolimus, Everolimus and Novolimus were associated with reduction in myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularisation (TLR) and stent thombosis compared with first-generation DES. However, even with second-generation DES, concerns remain regarding the risk of delayed healing, late stent thrombosis and in-stent restenosis (around 2% per year) and alteration of vascular physiology due to permanent caging by the stent. Hence, drug-eluting balloons (DEB), {also referred as Drug Coated Balloons (DCB)} were developed as a non-stent approach to circumvent some drawbacks of DES. Provided pre-dilatation does not induce excessive dissection or recoil requiring a stent, DEBs deliver rapid release and deposition of anti-restenotic drug in the vessel wall at the time of balloon inflation but without a permanent implant, thus enabling more rapid healing of the vessel, similar reduction in restenosis to DES but potentially reduced late complications. Currently, DEBs are used in treating In-stent restenosis (ISR), bifurcation lesions, Ostial lesions, long & large lesions, De novo of small vessel disease, complex coronary interventions, and high bleeding risk situations. Although DEBs are generally safe and non-inferior to other contemporary treatment procedure there are many unanswered questions about DEB technology in real world population. Geographical distribution of clinical trials or sample size and diversification is an important criterion to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the DEBs in real- world settings. The trend indicates fewer domestic trials for DEB. In lieu of the above clinical and translational gaps a registry is planned to assess safety and performance of the Drug Eluting Balloon in CAD patients.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Craigavon Area Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years * Patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease (including those with acute coronary syndromes or Chronic Coronary Syndromes) with either symptoms and/or ischaemia. * The patient must be able to understand and provide informed consent and comply with all study procedures. Coronary angiographic inclusion criteria: * ≥70% target lesion stenosis in LAD, LCX or RCA (or branches) which after successful pre-dilatation\* has a residual stenosis ≤ 30% and no dissection of Type C or greater than (NHLBI guidelines) \*pre-dilation permitted with SC or NC balloon catheter, cutting/scoring balloon, rotational/orbital atherectomy, or laser * Target vessel reference diameter between 2.0 and 4.5 mm.

Exclusion criteria

* Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 30% * Acute ST elevation MI (STEMI) * Cardiogenic shock within 2 days prior to the index PCI. * Known contraindication or hypersensitivity to paclitaxel, and/or to any anti-thrombotic and anti-platelet class of drugs * Allergy to imaging contrast media which cannot be adequately pre-medicated. * Patient undergoing planned surgery within 3 months with the necessity to stop dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). * Patient is pregnant or breast feeding. * Patient has received a heart transplant. * Patient is unwilling or unable to give follow-up until study completion. * Patient is currently participating in another trial. * Life expectancy \<1 year. Angiographic

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Target Lesion failure12 MonthTarget Lesion failure through 12-months \[composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (MI) and ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR)\]

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)MACE at 1 year; Procedural & Device Success at BaselineMajor Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) \[Time Frame: through 12 Months\] - Composite of all cause death, any MI, any revascularization Device success \[Time Frame: During index procedure\] - Defined as the ability of the study device to be delivered, dilated and retrieved from the target lesion. Procedural success \[Time Frame: From Index procedure till discharge\] - Defined as technical and angiographic success in the absence of Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) during hospitalization.

Contacts

Primary ContactDr Ian Brian Alexander Menown, MD(QUB), MB BCh BAO(QUB), MRCP
ian.menown@southerntrust.hscni.net+ 44 2838 334444

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026