Skip to content

Impact of Basophobia on Balance and Functional Outcomes in Patients With Stroke

Impact of Basophobia on Balance and Functional Outcomes in Patients With Stroke.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06899451
Acronym
stroke
Enrollment
80
Registered
2025-03-28
Start date
2024-09-09
Completion date
2025-03-03
Last updated
2025-06-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Balance, Stroke Hemorrhagic, Stroke, Ischemic

Keywords

fear of falling, balance, stroke

Brief summary

Several studies have reported that the physical functions associated with falls, including motor performance, postural balance, flexibility, and muscle strength, are also associated with FoF. Patients with stroke have trouble performing ADLs, including washing their face, eating, bathing, dressing, toileting, and walking, which also affect FoF. Anxiety and depression are common affective disorders in patients with stroke and significantly increase FoF .

Detailed description

People who are afraid of falling because they can't keep their balance can utilize This makes them less susceptible to fall and high tendency to prevent it.

Interventions

OTHERsystematic desensitization and balance

1. Systematic desensitization: 2 techniques 1. Jacobson's technique (progressive muscle relaxation): 2. Guided imagery training is a relaxation technique 2. Goal-directed paradigm (selected program)

Sponsors

AlRyada University for Science & Technology
CollaboratorOTHER
Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

an ischemic stroke and having had the disease for longer than three months have frequent falling, having sufficient cognition (as measured by a Montreal Cognitive Assessment score of over 26) and having upper and lower extremity spasticity ranging from (grade 1+: 2) on a modified Ashworth scale

Exclusion criteria

) Musculoskeletal issues, such as severe arthritis, total hip arthroplasty, knee surgery, lower extremity fractures within the previous six months, or contractures brought on by a fixed deformity and/or disparity in leg length, 2) Instable medical conditions (e.g., unstable angina, recent myocardial infarction, history of congestive heart failure, major heart valve problems, or unstable hypertension);

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Berg Balance Scale5 monthsis a five-point scaling score, a range of Zero - 4. Zero was given at the least level of function, while grade 4 will be given at the highest level of function. The scores are classified as follows: 41-56 = low fall risk, 21-40 = medium fall risk, and 0 -20 = high fall risk
The 16-item Fall Efficacy Scale-International5 monthsutilized to evaluate fear of falls.Varying from one (not concerned) to four (very concerned). For data analysis, the overall score, which was the sum of the 16 answers and ranged from 16 to 64 points, was utilized. A greater total score means the patients are more concerned about falling
Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)5 monthsstarts with the patient getting up from the chair, walk 3 meters once a signal is given, walk 3 meters back to the chair, and then sit down calculating time taken by the patient

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
fear of falling5 monthsBiodex Balance Systems

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026