Skip to content

Myopia Adjustment Using Dual-intervention: Red-Light Therapy & Innovative Design in Orthokeratology

Myopia Adjustment Using Dual-intervention: Red-Light Therapy & Innovative Design in Orthokeratology

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06899139
Acronym
MADRID
Enrollment
20
Registered
2025-03-27
Start date
2024-03-01
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2025-03-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

MYOPIA

Keywords

Myopia, Orthokeratology, Red-Light Therapy, RLRL

Brief summary

This clinical trial investigates the efficacy of combining orthokeratology (OK) lenses with repeated low-level red-light (R.L.R.L.) therapy in slowing the progression of myopia in children classified as ortho-k non-responders. The MADRID study is a single-centre, prospective, randomized controlled trial conducted at the Centro Fernández-Velázquez in Madrid, Spain. Participants aged 8 to 15 years will be randomly assigned to either a control group (OK lenses only) or an experimental group (OK lenses + R.L.R.L. therapy). The primary objective is to assess the potential additive effect of R.L.R.L. therapy on axial length control over a 6 to 12-month follow-up period. All participants will undergo ocular biometry and posterior segment OCT at regular intervals. The study is fully self-funded by the institution and adheres to rigorous ethical and safety standards.

Detailed description

Background and Rationale Myopia is a growing public health concern worldwide, especially among children, due to its progressive nature and association with severe ocular complications later in life. Orthokeratology (OK) lenses are one of the most effective non-pharmacological interventions for myopia control, reducing axial elongation by up to 63%. However, a subset of children, referred to as ortho-k non-responders, continue to exhibit rapid axial elongation despite consistent use of OK lenses. Repeated low-level red-light (R.L.R.L.) therapy is a novel, non-invasive intervention that has shown promise in reducing myopia progression. Preliminary studies suggest its mechanism may involve choroidal thickening, potentially complementing the effects of OK lenses. This study seeks to evaluate whether the combination of OK and R.L.R.L. offers additive benefits in myopia control for this specific population. Study Design and Objectives This is a prospective, single-centre, randomized controlled clinical trial. The trial is being conducted at the Centro Fernández-Velázquez (Madrid, Spain) and aims to recruit 10 participants aged 8-15 years who meet specific inclusion criteria, including documented poor response to orthokeratology alone. Participants will be randomized into two groups: Experimental Group: OK lens + R.L.R.L. therapy (2 sessions/day, 3 minutes/session, minimum 4-hour interval) Control Group: OK lens only The primary endpoint is the change in axial length over 6 months, with the possibility of extending the intervention and monitoring for up to 12 months. Secondary endpoints include changes in refractive error, choroidal thickness, and treatment tolerance. Measurements and Timeline Axial length will be measured using the Oculus Myopia Master. Posterior segment imaging will be performed with Topcon Maestro OCT. All evaluations are scheduled at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months, and-if extended-at 9 and 12 months. All measurements will be performed between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. to minimize diurnal variation. Safety and Ethics All participants and/or their guardians will sign an informed consent prior to enrollment. The study adheres to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. A detailed adverse event management and reporting protocol is in place. All serious adverse events (SAEs) will be reported to the relevant ethical committees within 72 hours. Funding and Conflicts of Interest This trial is fully self-funded by the Centro Fernández-Velázquez. The investigators declare no financial or personal conflicts of interest. Conclusion This study will provide important preliminary evidence on the combined use of OK lenses and red-light therapy in managing progressive myopia in children who are non-responsive to orthokeratology alone. If effective, this combined approach could be incorporated into standard care protocols for high-risk paediatric patients.

Interventions

OTHEROrthokeratology Lens Wear

Orthokeratology Lens Wear Intervention Type: Device Description: Participants will wear gas-permeable orthokeratology (OK) lenses overnight for a minimum of 8 hours per night. Lenses are designed to reshape the cornea temporarily to reduce refractive error and slow axial elongation. This intervention is administered to both the experimental and control groups.

DEVICERepeated Low-Level Red-Light Therapy Intervention Type: Device Description: Participants in the experimental group will receive repeated low-level red-light (R.L.R.L.) therapy twice daily using a no

Description: Participants in the experimental group will receive repeated low-level red-light (R.L.R.L.) therapy twice daily using a non-invasive light-emitting device. Each session will last no more than 3 minutes, with a minimum interval of 4 hours between sessions. The therapy is administered under parental supervision and aims to enhance myopia control in conjunction with orthokeratology.

Sponsors

Centro de Miopía Fernández-Velázquez
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This is a two-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial. Participants will be allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either the experimental group (Orthokeratology + Repeated Low-Level Red-Light Therapy) or the control group (Orthokeratology only). Randomization will be computer-generated and stratified to ensure balanced group sizes. The intervention will be applied continuously for 6 months, with a possible extension to 12 months based on interim evaluation.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Children aged 8 to 15 years. Intention to undergo orthokeratology (OK) lens treatment. Spherical equivalent refractive error between -1.00 and -4.00 diopters in either eye. Astigmatism no greater than 1.50 D in either eye. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 25/25 or better in both eyes. Birth weight of at least 1500 g. Classified as ortho-k non-responders: continued OK use with persistent rapid myopia progression. Willingness of child and legal guardian to participate and attend follow-up visits. Signed informed consent by parent or guardian.

Exclusion criteria

* cular conditions such as strabismus, amblyopia, cataract, or ptosis. Previous use of OK lenses or atropine for myopia control. Contraindications to atropine (e.g., known allergy, cardiovascular disease, epilepsy). Ocular contraindications to OK lens wear (e.g., inflammation, infection). Systemic diseases that may affect ocular growth (e.g., Down syndrome, Marfan syndrome). Any other ocular disease that could interfere with study outcomes.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Axial Length12 monthsAxial length (in millimetres) will be measured using the Myopia Master (Oculus) at baseline and at 6 and 12 months to evaluate the progression of myopia. Measurements will be conducted between 9:00-11:00 a.m. to reduce diurnal variation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Refractive Error (Spherical Equivalent) at 6 and 12 Months12 monthsChange in spherical equivalent refraction (in dioptres) from baseline to 6 and 12 months will be assessed via cycloplegic autorefraction and subjective refraction to monitor refractive progression.
Change in Subfoveal Choroidal Thickness at 6 and 12 Months12 monthsSubfoveal choroidal thickness will be measured using spectral-domain OCT (Topcon Maestro) at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months to assess structural retinal changes potentially associated with treatment efficacy.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026