Skip to content

z Mini-plate With Lingual Extension Versus Conventional 2 Mini Plates

Evaluating the Efficacy of Patient Specific Z-shape Mini-plate With Lingual Extension Versus Usual Two Mini-plates in Mandibular Class III Fracture Management

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06898710
Enrollment
20
Registered
2025-03-27
Start date
2025-05-01
Completion date
2025-12-01
Last updated
2025-03-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mandible Fracture

Brief summary

The collected patients according to the eligibility criteria will be randomly distributed into one of these groups: Group I : 10 patients suffering class III mandibular fracture will be managed by patient specific Z shape mini-plate with lingual extension (study group). Group II : 10 patients suffering class III mandibular fracture will be managed by 2 mini plates at superior and inferior borders (control group). The allocation sequence will be generated using computerized random numbers and kept in sealed envelopes, which will be opened prior to surgery. All patients will provide the informed consent after declaration the procedures, benefits, and harms

Interventions

patient with class III mandible fracture will be treated with patient specific z mini plate with lingual extension

PROCEDUREconventional 2 mini plates

patient with class III mandible fracture will be treated with conventional 2 mini plates

Sponsors

Fayoum University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* \- Class III mandibular fracture * medically stable patient * aged above 21 years * no medical condition affect the bone healing

Exclusion criteria

* • absence of other facial trauma, mandibular condylar fracture * patient refuse the follow up

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
inter condylar distance3 months

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026