Skip to content

Comparison of Surgeons' Object Discernment Via Their Hands Versus Using a Robotic Surgical System That Does Not Incorporate Haptics

Comparison of Surgeons' Object Discernment Via Their Hands Versus Using a Robotic Surgical System That Does Not Incorporate Haptics

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06896084
Enrollment
53
Registered
2025-03-26
Start date
2023-08-31
Completion date
2024-08-09
Last updated
2025-03-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Services Research

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare surgeons' discernment of 4 balloons filled with different materials when using their eyes and hands versus using the da Vinci robot.

Detailed description

The study design is a non-randomized parallel group study in which a group of surgeons (Group A) will make determinations as to the material within each of four visually identical balloons that contain air, water, petroleum jelly or a firm substance similar to the consistency of a non-ripe banana using their hands and eyes while another group of experienced robotic surgeons (Group B) will do so using the da Vinci Xi System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA). Before making their hands on determinations as to balloon contents, each participant will be asked to first determine whether they can visually determine the balloon contents without any manipulation. For the purposes of outcome measurement, only two possible outcomes are considered - namely that the 4 balloons are ordered correctly or not. Investigators will also record each guess for all participants in order to report any trends of mis-assortment that may occur.

Interventions

DEVICEda Vinci Xi System

A group of surgeons will make determinations as to the material within identical balloons while using the da Vinci Xi System

Sponsors

Valley Health System
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Board Certified Surgeon * Robotic Board Certified Surgeon

Exclusion criteria

• Non Board Certified Surgeon

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of participants with Farrington-Manning test of Binary Non-Inferiority1 monthUsing the Farrington-Manning test of binary non-inferiority, investigators hypothesize that 100% correct balloon discernment by hands-on surgeons and prospectively set 80% correct discernment by robotic surgeons as their definition of non-inferiority. A correct response is a binary outcome for each of the four balloons.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026