Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of HLX15-IV Versus DARZALEX® in Combination with Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone (Rd) in Transplant-ineligible Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-controlled, Multicenter, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of HLX15-IV Versus DARZALEX® in Combination with Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone (Rd) in Transplant-ineligible Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06895512
Enrollment
386
Registered
2025-03-26
Start date
2025-04-30
Completion date
2027-07-31
Last updated
2025-03-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Brief summary

This is a randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled, multicenter, phase III study to compare the efficacy and safety of HLX15-IV in combination with Rd (HLX15-IV-Rd) versus DARZALEX® in combination with Rd (D-Rd) in patients with NDMM who are ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT).

Interventions

DRUGHLX15-IV

recombinant anti-CD38 human monoclonal antibody injection

recombinant anti-CD38 human monoclonal antibody injection

Sponsors

Shanghai Henlius Biotech
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Capable to understand and sign the ICF. 2. Patients aged ≥ 18 years . 3. Patient must have documented multiple myeloma (MM) satisfying the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) diagnostic criteria for MM. 4. Newly diagnosed, untreated and not considered candidate for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). 5. Patient must have an ECOG performance status score of 0. 6. Patient must have pretreatment clinical laboratory values. 7. Contraceptive use by men or women should be consistent with local regulations. 8. A WOCBP must have a negative serum pregnancy test at screening within 72 hours prior to randomization.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patient has a diagnosis of primary amyloidosis, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), Waldenström's disease, or other conditions in which IgM M-protein is present in the absence of a clonal plasma cell infiltration with lytic bone lesions. 2. Patient has plasma cell leukemia or POEMS syndrome . 3. Patient has prior or current systemic therapy or ASCT for MM before randomization. 4. Patient has peripheral neuropathy or neuropathic pain Grade 2 or higher. 5. Patient has a history of malignancy (other than MM) within 3 years before randomization . 6. Patient has clinical signs of meningeal involvement of MM. 7. Patient has known COPD, persistent asthma, or a history of asthma within the last 2 years. 8. Patient is known to be seropositive for history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or known to have treponema pallidum antibodies (Anti-TP). 9. Patient is known to have active hepatitis B or C. 10. Patient has any concurrent medical or psychiatric condition or disease that is likely to interfere with the study procedures or results. 11. Patient has clinically significant cardiac disease. 12. Patient has known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to treatment drugs. 13. Patient has history of drug abuse or substance abuse. 14. Patient is a woman who is pregnant, or breast-feeding, or planning to become pregnant or donate eggs (ova, oocytes). 15. Patient had radiation therapy within 14 days of randomization. 16. Patient had plasmapheresis within 28 days of randomization. 17. Patient had major surgery within 28 days before randomization. 18. Patient in clinical trials of any other drug or device within 3 months before randomization. 19. Patient has any condition could prevent, limit, or confound the protocol-specified assessments.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
IRC-assessed Week 24 rate of very good partial response (VGPR) or better24 weeksthe percentage of patients achieving VGPR or CR (including sCR) until Week 24 after the date of randomization.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
IRC- and investigator-assessed Week 12, 36 and 48 rate of VGPR or better12,36,48 weekspercentage of patients achieving VGPR or CR (including sCR) until Week 12, 36 and 48 after the date of randomization
IRC- and investigator-assessed partial response (PR) rate48 weeksthe percentage of patients achieving PR at any time point after the date of randomization
IRC- and investigator-assessed complete response (CR) rate48 weeksthe percentage of patients achieving CR at any time point after the date of randomization.
IRC- and investigator-assessed stringent complete response (sCR) rate48 weekspercentage of patients achieving sCR at any time point after the date of randomization
IRC- and investigator-assessed complete response (CR) or better rate48 weeksthe percentage of patients achieving CR or sCR at any time point after the date of randomization.
IRC- and investigator-assessed overall response rate48 weeksthe percentage of patients who achieve PR or better after the date of randomization.
IRC- and investigator-assessed time to response (TTR)48 weeksthe time from the date of randomization to the date of initial documentation of a response (PR or better) for patient who had achieved a response of PR or better
IRC- and investigator-assessed duration of response (DOR)48 weeksthe date of initial documentation of a response (PR or better) to either progressive disease according the IMWG criteria, or death, whichever occurs first
Investigator-assessed Week 24 rate of VGPR or better24 weeksthe percentage of patients achieving VGPR or CR (including sCR) until Week 24 after the date of randomization
Minimal residual disease (MRD) negative rate48 weeksthe percentage of patients who achieve negative MRD at least once during the confirmed complete response (CR) or better according to the IMWG response criteria.
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Health Status (EORTC-QLQ-C30).48 weeksEuropean Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Health Status (EORTC-QLQ-C30).Minimum and maximum values is according to the items, the score range of item 1-28 is 1-4, the score range of item 29-30 is 1-7. The higher the overall score is, the better the overall quality of life is.
EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level Health Status (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire.48 weeksEuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level Health Status (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire.The description of health status is divided into five levels.Health Status Index range is -0.59-1.00, VAS range is 0-100.The higher the Health Status Index and VAS score are, the better the health condition is; the lower the dimension description score is, the fewer problems there are.
Incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs)52 weeksseverity determined according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events \[NCI CTCAE\] Version \[v\] 5.0, vital signs and clinical laboratory test results
Time to reach maximum serum drug concentration at steady state (Tmax, ss)48 weeksDetailed Outcome Measure will be defined in the Statistical Analysis Plan
Time to reach maximum serum drug concentration(Tmax)48 weeksDetailed Outcome Measure will be defined in the Statistical Analysis Plan
Immunogenicity48 weeksIncidence of ADA and/or NAb for HLX15-IV and DARZALEX
IRC- and investigator-assessed progression free survival (PFS)48 weeksthe duration from the date of randomization to either progressive disease, according to the IMWG response criteria, or death, whichever occurs first.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026