Cleft Lip and Palate, Speech Disorders in Children
Conditions
Keywords
Cleft lip and palate, Qualitative research, Speech therapy, Interviews, Speech intervention intensity
Brief summary
A cleft (lip and) palate (CP±L) is the most common congenital abnormality of the face and skull with a significant social impact, affecting speech, hearing, feeding, oral behavior, dentition and satisfaction with appearance. These consequences have a long-term and negative impact on social integration and well-being. The World Health Organization (WHO) highlights the significant financial costs, including morbidity, health care costs, emotional distress and social exclusion for patients, their families and society. The purpose of this study is to compare high- and low-intensity speech intervention in children with CP±L based on the perceptions of the providers of the intervention (primary care speech-language pathologists) and the recipients of the intervention (children with CP±L and their caregivers). Individual semi-structured interviews will be conducted with both intervention providers and recipients to explore perceptions and experiences, as well as acceptability of the two speech intervention intensities. Potential participants will be told that the interview will be recorded. The actual interviews will take place at a location and time that is most convenient for the participants. Each interview will be recorded using a Roland R-05 high-quality audio recorder. After conducting the interviews, all participants will be asked to complete a questionnaire regarding their demographics. In addition, data regarding the type of cleft, time and manner of closure of the cleft, any secondary surgery and otological/audiological data will be collected from the medical records of the children with CP±L. Based on this qualitative study, possible adjustments to the high-intensity therapy protocol can be made. In doing so, these modifications will be relevant to these key stakeholders. This will also facilitate the implementation and widespread use of high-intensity speech therapy in clinical speech therapy practice.
Interventions
High intensity speech intervention 5 times 30' per week for 2 times 4 weeks
low intensity speech intervention 2 times 30' per week for 20 weeks
Sponsors
Research Foundation Flanders
University Ghent
Study design
Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Belgian Dutch-speaking children with a cleft palate with or without a cleft lip * Aged between 4 and 12 years, * Presence of at least one compensatory speech error in their speech based on the perceptual assessment of one experienced speech-language pathologist
Exclusion criteria
* Children with syndromic clefts * Oronasal fistula * Velopharyngeal insufficiency * Hearing disabilities based on pure tone audiometry (\>25 dB HL) * Cognitive and/or related learning disabilities or neuromuscular disorders
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Perceptions and acceptability of low/high intensive speech intervention | 20 weeks | Participants will be interviewed and can talk about their experiences and perceptions regarding the speech intervention intensity. The acceptability of both high and low intensive therapy will be examined |
Countries
Belgium
Contacts
Primary ContactTara Mouton
Outcome results
None listed