Skip to content

Cognitive Cueing and Video Intervention for Gait in Parkinson's Disease

Investigating the Longitudinal Efficacy of Cognitive Cueing and Video Intervention for Gait in People With Parkinson's Disease

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06894030
Acronym
CogCueVidPD
Enrollment
30
Registered
2025-03-25
Start date
2025-04-30
Completion date
2029-08-31
Last updated
2025-03-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson's Disease

Keywords

Gait, Cueing, Balance, Mobility

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if cognitive cueing (eg., prompting individuals to think about taking big-long steps while walking), either as a stand- alone intervention or combined with a personalized gait training video, can improve gait (walking), mobility, and balance confidence for individuals with Parkinson's Disease. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does focusing on cognitive cues while walking improve gait, mobility, and balance confidence for individuals with Parkinson's Disease? 2. Does incorporating a personalized gait training video alongside cognitive cueing lead to amplified improvements in gait, mobility, and balance confidence for individuals with Parkinson's Disease? Researchers will compare how gait, mobility, balance confidence and quality of life change over time for participants when they practice walking with and without a cognitive cue alone, and when they practice with using a personalized gait training video. The researchers are also interested in how participation in this trial will affect quality of life and conscious attention to gait. Participants will * Complete walking trials on an instrumented mat that records data on their walking ability. These trials will be undertaken without a cognitive cue and while participants mentally rehearse a series of 3 cognitive cues (Take big long steps; Walk heel-toe; Stand up straight). * Be informed about which of the 3 cues best improved their walking and will receive a personalized gait training video for at home practice. * Complete online surveys that ask questions about their Parkinson's Disease, mobility, balance confidence quality of life and conscious attention to gait. * Visit the research facility 3 to 4 times during the study to have their gait (walking), mobility, balance confidence, quality of life and conscious attention to gait assessed and reassessed. * Practice both with and without their personalized video at home and keep a diary to record their practice sessions * Participate in a brief interview to discuss their experiences with the training and their perceptions of the effectiveness of cognitive cues and video-recorded feedback

Interventions

BEHAVIORALGait Training Video

Personalized gait training videos featuring cued and non-cued gait for participants

BEHAVIORALCognitive Cue

A verbal cue to be mentally rehearsed by each participant

Sponsors

Western University, Canada
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The Video Start group will receive their gait training video once the intervention begins. The Video Delay group will receive their gait training video after a 4-week delay.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Be diagnosed with Parkinson's Disease * Be fluent in English * Be able to walk independently and without a walking aid for at least 10 minutes * Have no other cognitive or neurological impairments (e.g., brain tumours, recent concussion, stroke, brain injury)

Exclusion criteria

* Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) implant * Standardized Mini Mental State Examination (SMMSE) score less than 24

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Timed Up and Go (TUG)From baseline to the end of the study (~17 weeks after baseline) as follows: Week 0 (Baseline), Week 5 (Session 2); Week 9 (Session 3 Video Delay Group ONLY); Week 13 (Session 3 Video Start Group ONLY); Week 17 (Session 4 Video Delay Group ONLY)Timed test of functional mobility where participants are recorded on the number of seconds it takes to stand up from a chair, walk 10ft, turn around, walk back 10ft, and sit back in the chair. Longer times suggest lower functional mobility.
Mean of Stride VelocityFrom baseline to the end of the study (~17 weeks after baseline) as follows: Week 0 (Baseline), Week 5 (Session 2); Week 9 (Session 3 Video Delay Group ONLY); Week 13 (Session 3 Video Start Group ONLY); Week 17 (Session 4 Video Delay Group ONLY)Mean of stride velocity measured in centimeters per second-squared (cm/s\^2).
Variability in Sride VelocityFrom baseline to the end of the study (~17 weeks after baseline) as follows: Week 0 (Baseline), Week 5 (Session 2); Week 9 (Session 3 Video Delay Group ONLY); Week 13 (Session 3 Video Start Group ONLY); Week 17 (Session 4 Video Delay Group ONLY)Coefficient of variation in stride velocity.
Mean of Double Support TimeFrom baseline to the end of the study (~17 weeks after baseline) as follows: Week 0 (Baseline), Week 5 (Session 2); Week 9 (Session 3 Video Delay Group ONLY); Week 13 (Session 3 Video Start Group ONLY); Week 17 (Session 4 Video Delay Group ONLY)Mean double support time measured as a proportion (0-1). This is the proportion of a gait cycle spent with two feet on the ground.
Variability in Double Support TimeFrom baseline to the end of the study (~17 weeks after baseline) as follows: Week 0 (Baseline), Week 5 (Session 2); Week 9 (Session 3 Video Delay Group ONLY); Week 13 (Session 3 Video Start Group ONLY); Week 17 (Session 4 Video Delay Group ONLY)Coefficient of variation in double support time
Mean Stride LengthFrom baseline to the end of the study (~17 weeks after baseline) as follows: Week 0 (Baseline), Week 5 (Session 2); Week 9 (Session 3 Video Delay Group ONLY); Week 13 (Session 3 Video Start Group ONLY); Week 17 (Session 4 Video Delay Group ONLY)Mean of stride length measured in centimeters (cm).
Variability iin Stride LengthFrom baseline to the end of the study (~17 weeks after baseline) as follows: Week 0 (Baseline), Week 5 (Session 2); Week 9 (Session 3 Video Delay Group ONLY); Week 13 (Session 3 Video Start Group ONLY); Week 17 (Session 4 Video Delay Group ONLY)Coefficient of variation in stride length.
Mean of Stride WidthFrom baseline to the end of the study (~17 weeks after baseline) as follows: Week 0 (Baseline), Week 5 (Session 2); Week 9 (Session 3 Video Delay Group ONLY); Week 13 (Session 3 Video Start Group ONLY); Week 17 (Session 4 Video Delay Group ONLY)Mean of stride width measured in centimeters (cm).
Variability in Stride WidthFrom baseline to the end of the study (~17 weeks after baseline) as follows: Week 0 (Baseline), Week 5 (Session 2); Week 9 (Session 3 Video Delay Group ONLY); Week 13 (Session 3 Video Start Group ONLY); Week 17 (Session 4 Video Delay Group ONLY)Coefficient of variation in stride width.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gait-Specific Attentional Profile (G-SAP)From baseline to the end of the study (~17 weeks after baseline) as follows: Week 0 (Baseline), Week 5 (Session 2); Week 9 (Session 3 Video Delay Group ONLY); Week 13 (Session 3 Video Start Group ONLY); Week 17 (Session 4 Video Delay Group ONLY)11-item self-report scale where participants rate the frequency that they experience the scenarios described by the items on a 5pt Likert scale (0- not all all, 5 - very much so). Scores are calculated on the followings 4 sub-scales ( Anxiety \[/15\], Conscious movement processing\[/15\], Fall-related ruminations\[/10\], Processing efficiency\[/10\]). Lower sum scores for Anxiety, Fall related ruminations and Processing efficiency indicate better outcomes. Higher sum score for Conscious movement processing indicate greater attention is focused on walking.
Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (PDQ-39)From baseline to the end of the study (~17 weeks after baseline) as follows: Week 0 (Baseline), Week 5 (Session 2); Week 9 (Session 3 Video Delay Group ONLY); Week 13 (Session 3 Video Start Group ONLY); Week 17 (Session 4 Video Delay Group ONLY)39-item self-report scale designed to evaluate quality of life of people with Parkinson's Disease across 8 dimensions of daily living. Participants rank items on a 5pt Likert scale (0 - never, 4 - always). Higher scores in each dimension's sub-scale and the scale as a whole indicate a poorer quality of life.
Standardized Mini Mental State Examination (SMMSE)At baseline only11 items/tasks administered to measure participant's cognitive abilities and screen for potential cognitive impairment. The final score is out of 30 total pts where higher scores indicate greater cognitive function.
Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC)From baseline to the end of the study (~17 weeks after baseline) as follows: Week 0 (Baseline), Week 5 (Session 2); Week 9 (Session 3 Video Delay Group ONLY); Week 13 (Session 3 Video Start Group ONLY); Week 17 (Session 4 Video Delay Group ONLY)16-item self-report scale where participants rate their confidence on items using 0 to 100 scale. The scale score is the mean of all items, with a maximum of 100 and minimum of 0. Higher score indicate greater balance confidence.

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactSarah V Park
spark822@uwo.ca(902) 300 9488
Backup ContactJeffrey Holmes
jholme@uwo.ca

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026