Skip to content

Combined General and Spinal Anesthesia Compared to General Anesthesia During Laparoscopic Surgery : a Randomised Controlled Trial

Combined General and Spinal Anesthesia Compared to General Anesthesia During Laparoscopic Surgery : a Randomised Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06892600
Enrollment
30
Registered
2025-03-25
Start date
2023-08-03
Completion date
2023-10-31
Last updated
2025-03-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

General Anesthesia Using Endotracheal Intubation, Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery, Spinal Anesthesia

Keywords

laparoscopy, combined spinal and general anesthesia, abdominal laparoscopic surgery, opioid consumption, spinal anesthesia

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if combining spinal and general anesthesia is better than general anesthesia alone for abdominal laparoscopic surgery in adults. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does combining spinal and general anesthesia provide better stability compared to general anesthesia alone during abdominal laparoscopic surgery? Does combining spinal and general anesthesia lead to less opioid consumption compared to general anesthesia alone for abdominal laparoscopic surgery? Participants will: Be randomized and allocated to either spinal and general anesthesia (combined) group vs general anesthesia (control) group In the combined group, participants will be given a spinal anesthesia followed by general anesthesia, compared to general anesthesia alone in the control group.

Interventions

DRUGCombined Spinal anesthesia (heavy bupivacaine 0.5%) and General anesthesia

Combined spinal and general anesthesia Spinal anesthesia with Bupivacaine heavy 0.5% 10 mg General anesthesia with Lidocaine 1.5mg/kg, Fentanyl 2 mcg/kg, propofol 2 mg/kg, Rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg

Lidocaine 1.5mg/kg, fentanyl 2 mcg/kg, propofol 2 mg/kg, rocuronium 0,6 mg/kg

Sponsors

Indonesia University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Two parallel groups - intervention and control group

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 64 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) 1-2 * BMI ≤ 30 kg/m2 * Adults (18-64 years old) who will undergo elective abdominal laparoscopic surgery (digestive surgery, gynecologic surgery or urologic surgery) * Willing to participate in this study

Exclusion criteria

* Cardiovascular disease (uncontrolled stage 2 hypertension, AV block, valvular heart disease, heart failure or arrythmia) * Cerebrovascular disease (within \< 3 months) * Infection at the proposed site of spinal injection * Coagulopathy * Elevated intracranial pressure * Severe kidney or liver dysfunction Drop out criteria: * Anesthesia duration \> 6 hours * Intraoperative emergency * Conversion to open laparotomy * Spinal complications (shock, anaphylaxis, seizure or high spinal) * Failed spinal (2 attempts)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Opioid consumptionThroughout the surgeryFentanyl dosage in mcg used during the procedure
Post-operative pain scoreWithin 24 hours after surgeryPost operative pain score
Hemodynamic stabilityDuring the surgeryMean arterial pressure (MAP) after insufflation variation of \< 20% compared to MAP after intubation

Countries

Indonesia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026