Skip to content

Self-Directed Positive Psychology Intervention for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Sclerosis

A Self-directed Positive Psychology Intervention for Individuals With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Sclerosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06891937
Enrollment
30
Registered
2025-03-24
Start date
2022-07-20
Completion date
2024-10-17
Last updated
2026-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis

Keywords

Positive psychology, Positive affect

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether positive psychology (PP) exercises such as writing a letter of gratitude or remembering a past success can help individuals with newly diagnosed multiple sclerosis (MS) to feel more hopeful, happy, and healthy. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Is a five-week self-directed PP training intervention feasible and acceptable to individuals with newly diagnosed MS? * Does the completion of a five-week self-directed PP training intervention improve positive affect, emotional function and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in individuals with newly diagnosed MS? * Are improvements in positive affect, emotional function and HRQOL maintained after the completion of the intervention? Participants will be randomized to the intervention or waitlist control group. There will be an intervention phase (weeks 1-5) and an extension phase (weeks 6-10). All participants will complete questionnaires at enrollment, 5 weeks and 10 weeks. They will complete 5 weeks of self-directed PP training exercises, either during the intervention phase (intervention group) or extension phase (waitlist control group) of the study. Researchers will compare participants in the intervention and waitlist control groups at the end of the intervention phase to see if there are improvements in positive affect, emotional function and HRQOL. For subjects in the intervention group who demonstrate improvement, researchers will determine if the benefit is maintained by comparing positive affect, emotional function and HRQOL at the completion of the intervention and extension phases of the study.

Interventions

5-week positive psychology intervention

Sponsors

Brigham and Women's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of MS according to the McDonald 2017 diagnostic criteria * Onset of disease within the last 2 years * Ability to speak, read and write in English

Exclusion criteria

• Moderate or marked cognitive abnormalities identified by the treating neurologist during routine clinical visits that would preclude meaningful participation in the PP exercises

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility of the Positive Psychology (PP) InterventionFive weeksPercentage of subjects who completed at least four of the five PP exercises.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subject Ratings of Ease of Completion of PP ExercisesFive weeksMeasured by averaging the weekly 0-10 post-exercise Likert scale ratings of ease of completion of PP exercises provided by subjects with 0 being very difficult to complete and 10 being very easy to complete.
Subject Ratings of Utility of PP ExercisesFive weeksMeasured by averaging the weekly 0-10 post-exercise Likert scale ratings of utility of PP exercises provided by subjects, with 0 being not helpful and 10 being very helpful.
Changes in Affect From Baseline to Five WeeksFive weeksMeasured by the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). PANAS is comprised of two 10-item mood scales, one measuring positive affect and the other measuring negative affect. Scores on the positive affect scale range form 10-50. Higher scores are associated with greater positive affect. Scores on the negative affect scale range from 10-50, with lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect.
Changes in Trait Optimism From Baseline to Five WeeksFive weeksMeasured by the Life Orientation Test - Revised (LOT-R). Lot-R is a 6-item measure of trait optimism and pessimism. Scores range from 0-24. Higher scores are associated with greater optimism.
Changes in Physical, Mental and Social Health From Baseline to Five WeeksFive weeksMeasured by Neuro-QoL. Neuro-QoL uses computer adaptive testing to assess 11 domains of physical, mental and social health including Ability to participate in Social Roles and Activities, Anxiety, Cognitive Function, Depression, Emotional and Behavioral Dyscontrol, Fatigue, Lower Extremity Function, Positive Affect and Well-being, Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities, Stigma and Upper Extremity Function. Neuro-QoL generates T scores with a mean of 50 and standard deviation (SD) of 10, based on the norming sample used, for each domain. All Neuro-QoL domains are scored such that a high score reflects more of what is being measured.
Changes in Resilience From Baseline to Five WeeksFive weeksMeasured by the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS). BRS is a 6-item measure of resilience with scores ranging from 1-5. Higher scores are associated with greater resilience.

Countries

United States

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous37.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
15 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
24 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
30 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 150 / 150 / 15
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 150 / 150 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 150 / 150 / 15

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026