Healthy
Conditions
Keywords
Sleep, Stress, Supplement
Brief summary
The purpose of this clinical trial is to assess the effects of a supplement combination on measures of sleep quality and stress in healthy adults.
Interventions
Ashwagandha, Rhodiola rosea, magnesium threonate, L-theanine, and apigenin.
Ashwagandha and Rhodiola rosea
Magnesium threonate, L-theanine, and apigenin.
Placebo AM and PM
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Randomized, placebo-controlled, between subjects, double-blind.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Healthy participants aged 18 to 50 years (inclusive) at the time of screening with a body mass index of 18.5 to 29.9 kg/m2. * Willing to give voluntary consent, be able to understand and read the questionnaires, carry out all study-related procedures, communicate effectively with the study staff, and agree to allow any study-related evaluations. * Participant is physically active: participating in resistance and/or endurance exercise ≥150 min/wk for ≥6 mo. * Participant will be asked about dietary supplementation use within the past 6 months. If participant began taking a supplement within the past month, participant will be asked to discontinue supplement use followed by a 2-week washout prior to participation.In all other cases, supplement use will be asked to be maintained throughout the study. • The participant has an apple device with iOS 16 or greater software.
Exclusion criteria
* Have a known sensitivity of allergy to any of the investigational products. * Participants currently taking any of the investigational products will be excluded. * Female participants who are lactating, pregnant, or planning to become pregnant during the study. * Diagnosed with any sleep-related or stress-related disorders. * Currently taking medication to manage sleep or cortisol levels. * Participants with controlled or uncontrolled hypertension including stage 1 hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥129 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure ≥89 mmHg). * Any other condition or abnormality that, in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise the safety of the participant or the quality of the study data.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in sleep latency | Daily for 4-weeks from baseline to Day 28. | Assessed by the Absolute Rest device, time taken to fall asleep. |
| Changes in sleep duration | Daily for 4-weeks from baseline to Day 28. | Assessed by the Absolute Rest device, total sleep time. |
| Changes in sleep apnea | Daily for 4-weeks from baseline to Day 28. | Assessed by the Absolute Rest device, values measures by oxygen saturation. |
| Changes in sleep efficiency. | Daily for 4-weeks from baseline to Day 28. | Assessed by the Absolute Rest device, total time asleep divided by time in bed, expressed as a percentage, higher is better. |
| Cohen's Perceived Stress scale | Baseline, Day 7, Day 14, Day 21, Day 28 | To determine changes in perceived stress by way of the Cohen's Perceived Stress scale. The minimum is 0 and max is 40, with higher values meaning more stress. |
| Positive mood and emotion | Baseline, Day 7, Day 14, Day 21, Day 28 | Assessed by the Positive and Negative Affect Scale. Min values of 0 and max of 50, higher scores indicate more positive moods and emotions. |
| Negative mood and emotion | Baseline, Day 7, Day 14, Day 21, Day 28 | Assessed by the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. Min values of 0 and max of 50, higher scores indicate more negative moods and emotions. |
| Weekly sleep disturbances. | Baseline, Day 7, Day 14, Day 21, Day 28 | Assessed by the Patient Reported Outcome Measures of sleep disturbances. Min values of 8 and max values of 40. Higher scores mean more sleep disturbances. |
| Weekly sleep impairment | Baseline, Day 7, Day 14, Day 21, Day 28 | Assessed by the Patient Reported Outcome Measures of sleep impairments. Min values of 8 and max values of 40. Higher scores mean more sleep impairments. |
| Changes in daily psychological stress | Daily for 4-weeks from baseline to Day 28. | Assessed by the Daily Stress Response Scale. Min 0, max 60 with higher scores indicating higher stress. |
| Changes in daily physiological stress | Daily for 4-weeks from baseline to Day 28. | Assessed by Daily Stress Response Scale. Min 0, max 60 with higher scores indicating higher stress. |
| Changes in subjective sleep quality. | Baseline and Day 28. | Assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index questionnaire. Min 0 and max 21, higher scores indicate worse sleep quality. |
| Changes in objective sleep quality. | Daily for 4-weeks from baseline to Day 28. | Assessed by the Absolute Rest device, higher scores are better. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percent compliance of supplement use | End of Week 2 and Week 3. | To determine the percent of compliance when taking AM and PM pills. Will be measured by the amount of pills taken / pills prescribed multiplied by 100. |
Countries
United States