Skip to content

Comparison of Preoperative Frailty Assessment Tools

Evaluation of a Feasible Frailty Assessment Tool for Preoperative Risk Evaluation of Older Patients

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06889545
Acronym
PREFAS
Enrollment
584
Registered
2025-03-21
Start date
2025-04-15
Completion date
2028-04-01
Last updated
2026-07-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Frailty, Frailty in Older Adults, Frailty/Sarcopenia

Brief summary

Frailty is a significant risk factor for postoperative complications and functional decline. Preoperative assessment of frailty is therefore recommended in all older adults. However, despite the availability of many frailty tools, few have been tested in the preoperative setting and there is little comparison of their predictive value in identifying patients at risk. The aim of this study is to investigate which of the following instruments for determining frailty has the highest predictive power with regard to the occurrence of postoperative complications: Risk Analysis Index, Clinical Frailty Scale, the Groningen Frailty Indicator, the Edmonton Frail Scale and the LUCAS-FI. The aim of this research project is to identify a suitable frailty instrument for preoperative risk stratification of older patients during the premedication visit.

Interventions

OTHERAssessment of frailty using multiple tools

This is an observational study without any intervention. Frailty is assessed using multiple tools and postoperative outcome is compared.

Sponsors

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
70 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 70 years and older * scheduled surgery * estimated time of surgery 120 Minutes or more

Exclusion criteria

* insufficient German language skills (for cognitive testing) * mental retardation * relevant psychiatric disorder (not allowing for cognitive testing)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complications in the first 30 days after surgery30 daysMeasured by Clavien-Dindo classification

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional state (activities of daily living)one, three and six months after surgeryMeasured using WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0
Postoperative Quality of Recoverypostoperative day 2Measured by Quality-of-Recovery-15 questionnaire
Muscle loss during hospitalisationFrom date of enrollment, up to 4 weeks after surgerymeasured by bioimpedance prior to admission and before discharge from hospital
Postoperative deliriumpostoperative day 1 to 5Measured by 3D-Confusion Assessment Method
Length of stayfrom day of surgery, up to 4 weeks after surgerydays spent in hospital after surgery
Discharge destinationup to 4 weeks after surgerye.g.:home, nursing home, other hospital
Cognitive state3 and 6 months after surgeryUsing 5-Minute Montreal Cognitive Assessment (telephone-MOCA). A maximum of 15 points and a minumum of 0 points can be archieved; a higher score indicates better cognitive performance.
Quality-of-Life (QoL)3 and 6 months after surgeryMeasured by WHO-Quality of Life in older adults (WHOQOL-OLD) questionnaire. The WHOQOL-OLD is evaluated by calculating scores for its six facets and summing them, with higher scores indicating a better perceived quality of life.
Frailty progression measured by LUCAS-FI3 and 6 months after surgeryFrailty assessment with Longitudinal Urban Cohort Aging Study Functional Index (LUCAS-FI)-questionnaire (telephone interview) The LUCAS-FI is evaluated by integrating both risk factors and protective resources, with the balance between them determining the degree of frailty.
Frailty progression measured by GFI (questionnaire)3 and 6 months after surgeryfrailty assessment with Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI) questionnaire (telephone interview). The GFI is evaluated by summing its item responses, with higher scores indicating a higher degree of frailty.
Frailty progression measured by EFS3 and 6 months after surgeryFrailty assessment by Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS), (score filled by physician, patient telephone interview). 1 to 10 points can be archieved, more points indicate a greater level of frailty.
Frailty progression by RAI measurement. The Risk Analysis Index (RAI) is evaluated by summing weighted risk factors and protective variables, with higher scores indicating greater patient vulnerability.3 and 6 months after surgeryFrailty assessment with Risk Analysis Index (index filled by physician, patient telephone interview)

Countries

Germany

Contacts

CONTACTDr. Cynthia Olotu, MD
c.olotu@uke.de0049 40 7410 52415
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORDr. Cynthia Olotu, MD

University Medical Centre Hamburg

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 23, 2026