Skip to content

Role of Plasma Rich Growth Factor in Repair Primary Cleft Palate

Evaluation of the Role of the Plasma-rich Growth Factor (PRGF) with Primary Cleft Palate Repair Versus Primary Cleft Palate Repair in Post-operative Wound Healing and Oronasal Fistula Occurrence, a Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06889181
Acronym
PRGF
Enrollment
36
Registered
2025-03-21
Start date
2025-04-01
Completion date
2027-06-30
Last updated
2025-03-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cleft Palate, Plasma Rich in Growth Factors

Keywords

cleft palate, plasma rich growth factor, healing

Brief summary

Does the plasma-rich growth factor (PRGF) with primary cleft palate repair accelerate wound healing and prevent post-operative oronasal fistula occurrence?

Detailed description

The primary objective is to assess and evaluate the improvement of wound healing (edema at 5th day post operatively) as a primary outcome, and secondary objective is to assess and evaluate the wound closure and the decreasing of the occurrence of the oronasal fistula as a secondary outcome among children with cleft palate, using plasma rich growth factor between nasal mucosa and palatal mucosa

Interventions

using prgf with closing primary cleft palate - isolated cleft palate Minutes before the surgery, 10-20 ml of venous blood from each patient. -The blood is centrifuged to obtain PRGF. -Fixed between nasal and palatal mucosa

OTHERPlacebo

primary closing cleft palate-isolated cleft palate

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Single blinded study. Blinding to the patient will be ensured by masking the instruments during the follow up. The patient will be informed of the steps of the follow up (as mentioned in the consent form) without getting into details of the method of follow up.

Intervention model description

Participants will be randomly assigned to either control or study group in the ratio of 1:1 using random number table.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Months to 18 Months
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* systemically healthy patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists -ASA I and II); not older than 6-18 months * Patients with primary non-syndromic isolated cleft palate * Apprehensive to be in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with recurrent palatal fistula * Existence of syndromic cleft palate * Blood diseases and platelet disorders (hematological disease) * Systematic disease radiotherapy or chemotherapy for malignancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
wound healing assesment (edema at 5th day post operatively)first day after surgery, 3rd day, and 5th dayclinical records, percentage of persistence of edema number of participants with percentage of persisting of edema

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
wound healing assesment2 yearsclinical records, counting days for healing as healing by days till closure
the occurrence of oronasal fistulafirst day after surgery to end of treatment at 3 monthsclinical records, yes/no Postoperative complications; mainly oronasal fistula by; clinical observation: inspection, clinical signs: regurgitation of food or drink

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026