Skip to content

Long-term Safety of Nipple Sparing Mastectomy in Women With High Penetrance Breast Cancer Susceptibility Genes in Breast Cancer

Long-term Oncologic Safety of Nipple Sparing Mastectomy in Women With High Penetrance Germline Pathogenic Variants in Breast Cancer Susceptibility Genes

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06888388
Acronym
NSM
Enrollment
4700
Registered
2025-03-21
Start date
2025-02-01
Completion date
2028-02-01
Last updated
2026-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer Surgery

Keywords

breast cancer surgery, nipple sparing mastectomy, oncologic safety, Cancer prevention, Breast Cancer Prevention, BRCA, germline pathogenic variant, GPV, Li Fraumeni, Hereditary lobular breast cancer, Cowden syndrome, PALB2

Brief summary

Patients with a germline pathogenic variant (GPV) in high-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility genes who are considering risk reducing mastectomy (RRM) often strongly desire to keep their nipple areola complex but inquire as to whether it is safe to do so. Relative to traditional or skin sparing mastectomy (SSM) techniques, nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM) is associated with improved psychosocial and sexual well-being and is significantly better for body image and reducing feelings of disfigurement. Despite this, guidelines have yet to endorse the use of NSM over other RRM techniques, stating that more data and longer follow-up are needed to confirm it as a safe and effective strategy in GPV carriers. As NSM was not routinely adopted in high-risk patient populations undergoing RRM before 2010, there has been little data to inform the long-term oncologic safety of NSM. Well-designed studies have reported low to negligible rates of subsequent breast cancer in BRCA1/2 carriers following NSM, but have been limited by short median follow-up of less than 3 years. The current study is designed to confirm, with longer follow-up, prior findings on the oncologic safety of NSM in unaffected BRCA1/2 carriers. The investigators will also expand data to other high-penetrance GPV carriers, including PALB2, CDH1, PTEN, and TP53, for whom there is little-to-no data on outcomes following RRM.

Interventions

PROCEDURENipple Sparing Mastectomy (NSM)

Nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM) is a surgical procedure which removes all macroscopic breast glandular tissue while retaining the skin as well as the nipple areola complex.

Skin sparing mastectomy (SSM) is a procedure that removes the nipple and areola complex along with all visible macroscopic breast glandular tissue.

PROCEDURETotal (Simple) Mastectomy

Total (Simple) Mastectomy is a traditional mastectomy approach that removes the breast glandular tissue with a large overlying area of skin including the nipple and areola complex to allow for flat closure.

Sponsors

Sir Mortimer B. Davis - Jewish General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER
Cancer Research Society
CollaboratorOTHER
Quebec Breast Cancer Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Assigned female sex at birth * Age 18 years or older * Confirmed GPV in BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, TP53, CDH1 or PTEN identified on pre-symptomatic genetic testing

Exclusion criteria

* History of breast cancer prior to genetic testing * History of ovarian cancer prior to genetic testing * History of bilateral mastectomy performed prior to genetic testing * Presence of a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) in the absence of another GPV in BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, TP53, CDH1 or PTEN.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of breast cancer following RRM10 yearsThe primary outcome of interest is the incidence of breast cancer following RRM, defined as a histologically confirmed diagnosis of in situ or invasive breast cancer present within the nipple/areola, skin, subcutaneous tissue of the chest wall/reconstructed breast, or axillary lymph nodes. Patients with clinically occult invasive breast cancer diagnosed at the time of RRM (ie. on mastectomy pathology) will be excluded from the primary outcome analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of RRM10 yearsTo evaluate uptake of RRM versus active surveillance amongst an international cohort of unaffected women with high-penetrance GPVs in BRCA1/2, PALB2, CDH1, PTEN, or TP53
Incidence of post-operative complications10 yearsTo evaluate post-operative complications and supplemental surgery following NSM, SSM, and total mastectomy in those undergoing RRM
Incidence of pathologic outcomes following NSM10 yearsTo evaluate pathologic outcomes following RRM, including the presence of high-risk lesions or occult in situ and/or invasive malignancy
Number of participants using endocrine prevention10 yearsTo explore the use of endocrine prevention in unaffected women with high-penetrance GPVs in BRCA1/2, PALB2, CDH1, PTEN, or TP53 who elect to undergo active surveillance
Number of participants who have undergone pre-mastectomy imaging and post-mastectomy surveillance10 yearsTo assess practices in pre-mastectomy imaging and post-mastectomy surveillance, including the number of participants who underwent preoperative MRI and mammography as well as post-mastectomy surveillance, including MRI, ultrasound and chest wall examination.

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Canada, Japan, Portugal, South Korea, United Kingdom, United States

Contacts

CONTACTStephanie Wong, MD
sm.wong@mcgill.ca5143408222
CONTACTSarah Sabboobeh, MSc
sarah.sabboobe@ladydavis.ca5143408222

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 19, 2026