Blood Pressure
Conditions
Keywords
Blood pressure monitoring, Non-invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring
Brief summary
The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the VeriTrack non-invasive blood pressure monitor compared to radial arterial catheterization in adult surgical patients. The main question it aims to answer is: How well does VeriTrack measure continuous blood pressure compared to an arterial catheter? Researchers will compare VeriTrack readings to arterial line measurements to determine if the VeriTrack provides comparable accuracy and clinical utility. Participants will wear the VeriTrack device during surgery and have a radial arterial catheter placed as part of standard care.
Interventions
Application of the VeriTrack non-invasive blood pressure monitor
Sponsors
Thomas Jefferson University
Vena Vitals
Study design
Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Patients whose blood pressure will be monitored using an arterial line during their procedure * Patients who have a palpable dorsalis pedis pulse
Exclusion criteria
* Patients who have non-palpable dorsalis pedis pulses * Patients whose limbs are inaccessible for placement of Vena Vitals Wearable * Patients with known allergy to adhesives and/or silicone
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy of the VeriTrack device in continuous blood pressure monitoring | 1-24 hours | Systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure (MAP) values will be compared between the VeriTrack and the arterial line using a Bland-Altman analysis. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Blood Pressure Change Accuracy | 1-24 hours | Changes in sys, dia, and MAP measured by VeriTrack will be evaluated and compared to the changes measured by the arterial line |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed