Skip to content

Comparison of WHO Treatment of Acute Watery Diarrhea With or Without Probiotic (Bacillus Clausii) in Children

Comparison of WHO Treatment of Acute Watery Diarrhea With or Without Probiotic (Bacillus Clausii) in Term of Mean Duration of Diarrhea in Children

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06887374
Enrollment
184
Registered
2025-03-20
Start date
2024-03-01
Completion date
2024-09-30
Last updated
2025-03-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Watery Diarrhea

Brief summary

This study aimed to compare WHO treatment of acute watery diarrhea with or without probiotic (bacillus clausii) in term of mean duration of diarrhea in children

Detailed description

Available literature regarding the use of probiotics is not conclusive and contains controversy, and local data is also scarce. Therefore, this study was planned to further explore the use of probiotics to furnish the local data. If significantly less mean duration of diarrhea is noted in the probiotic group, it will help to add probiotic bacillus clausii in routine treatment regimen recommended by WHO and to decrease costs associated with prolonged treatment. However, if otherwise results will be noted it will help to rule out use of probiotic bacillus clausii in children with acute diarrhea to avoid its unnecessary use.

Interventions

DRUGProbiotic Bacillus Clausii

Patients were given 2 billion spores of probiotic (Bacillus clausii) every12 hours, contained in a small bottle.

Sponsors

Muhammad Aamir Latif
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Months to 59 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Both genders * Aged 6 to 59 months * Suffering from acute watery diarrhea for ≤ 7 days

Exclusion criteria

* Children with blood in stool * With prior antibiotics use * Children under study with duration of stay more than 5 days * clinical signs of a coexisting acute systemic illness like pneumonia, sepsis, meningitis, severely malnourished * Immunocompromised children * Hypersensitivity to probiotics * With prior probiotic administration

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stool frequency5 daysA frequency of defecation of \< 3 stools per day marked the effectiveness of the treatment.
Consistency of stools5 daysThe treatment was considered effective if the consistency of stools became semi-solid.

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026