Skip to content

Evaluation of the Impact of Rotating Posterior and Transverse Presentations At 2 Hours of Full Dilation

Evaluation of the Impact of Rotating Posterior and Transverse Presentations At 2 Hours of Full Dilation

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06886854
Enrollment
1000
Registered
2025-03-20
Start date
2024-09-01
Completion date
2025-12-01
Last updated
2025-03-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fetus in Posterior or Transverse Position; Manual Rotation ; Obstetrics ; Delivery Room Practice

Brief summary

During labor, 20% of fetuses present in a posterior or transverse position. Among them, 90% rotate spontaneously during labor. For the remaining 10%, maintaining a posterior or transverse position leads to longer labor, increased instrumental deliveries, more cesarean sections, and more severe perineal tears. Obstetricians can intervene by manually rotating the fetus to an anterior position. Several studies have shown the benefits of this technique, but they were all conducted at full dilation or one hour after full dilation. This timing does not allow enough time for the fetus to rotate spontaneously. Additionally, manual rotation can be poorly tolerated by the patient, especially if pain management is insufficient. Our study aims to demonstrate the benefits of manual rotation two hours after full dilation. This delay allows 90% of fetuses to rotate spontaneously, and it could help harmonize obstetrical practices.

Interventions

DEVICEMode of delivery

Retrieval of delivery data, typically recorded by midwives - retrieval of data per delivery and post-delivery - Consultation of medical data on labor duration, labor onset method, estimated fetal weight, etc. Data collected for each delivery, identical in both groups.

Sponsors

Hospices Civils de Lyon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
15 Years to 50 Years

Inclusion criteria

* \- Patient delivering at Hospices Civils de Lyon (XR, HFME, LS?) * Low-pitched voice agreement * Mobile fetal cephalic presentation * Transverse or posterior presentation confirmed by ultrasound * 2 hours of complete dilation * Agreement for 3 hours by OB-GYN * Normal fetal heart rate * Epidural anesthesia in place * Bladder catheterized

Exclusion criteria

* \- Multiparous uterus with scars * Breech presentation * Fetus \> 5000 g * Patient refusal * Inadequate analgesia * Fetal hypoxia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of eutocic deliveriesCollected at the time of delivery.Collection of delivery data recorded by the midwife: eutocic delivery, instrumental extraction by vacuum, instrumental extraction by forceps, instrumental extraction by spatula, emergency cesarean section (green, orange, or red code).

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026