Inguinal Hernia, Laparoscopic Surgery, Randomized Controlled Trial
Conditions
Brief summary
This study aims to compare the clinical effects of uterine round ligament preservation versus resection in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in women.The primary outcomes included Time required for patient surgery.The secondary outcomes included Inguinal hernia recurrence,quality of life assessment,Indicators of postoperative recovery,, et al.
Interventions
PROCEDURETo remove the uterine uterine ligament
Both groups underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. The preservation group retained the uterine round ligament, while the resection group had it removed.
Sponsors
Nanchong Central Hospital
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* ►Age : Female patients over 18 years of age without a childbearing requirement * Diagnosis and basis : Female patients diagnosed with Unilateral inguinal hernia. * agreed to participate in this study and signed the informed consent form.
Exclusion criteria
* ►Combined with severe heart, liver, kidney and other diseases. * pregnant or lactating women. * those with surgical contraindications.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time required for patient surgery | 20-120minutes | Time required for patient surgery |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Inguinal hernia recurrence | 1 month, 3 months, 6 months,1year,2years,3years,6years | the recurrence of inguinal hernia |
| Quality of life assessment | 3 months,6months,1year,2years,3years,6years | Quality of life assessment:The international general quality of life scale (such as SF - 36, etc.) is used to evaluate the quality of life of patients at 3 months , 6months,1year,2years,3years and 6years after surgery. |
Countries
China
Outcome results
None listed