Skip to content

Physiotherapy/hypnosis for AVC Patients

Impact of Physiotherapy Combined to Hypnosis on Superior Limb Functional Capacities of AVC Patients

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06885294
Enrollment
84
Registered
2025-03-20
Start date
2023-03-18
Completion date
2026-07-30
Last updated
2025-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

Hypnosis, Stroke, physiotherapy

Brief summary

Impact of physical therapy with hypnosis on the functional capacity of the upper limb in stroked patients.

Detailed description

The cerebrovascular accident (CVA) is a pathology generating many disabled people. Physiotherapy is one of the usual rehabilitation techniques for a patient with sequelae of ischemia or cerebral hemorrhage. Combined with another therapeutic approach, hypnosis, it could increase the patient's motor performance.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPhysiotherapy

Stroke patients will be randomly assigned to join one of the three groups. The first group will undergo a pre-treatment evaluation, receive 6 sessions of physiotherapy (2 sessions per week, approximately 20-30 minutes each), and undergo a post-treatment evaluation after 1 month. After another month without any treatment, they will undergo a third and final assessment. All evaluations will last approximately 1 hour.

BEHAVIORALPhysiotherapy and Hypnosis

Stroke patients will be randomly assigned to join one of the three groups. The second group will undergo a pre-treatment evaluation, receive 6 sessions of physiotherapy combined with hypnosis (2 sessions per week, approximately 20-30 minutes each), and undergo a post-treatment evaluation after 1 month. Patients will continue their standard physiotherapy care during these 4 weeks. After another month without any treatment, they will undergo a third and final assessment. All evaluations will last approximately 1 hour.

BEHAVIORALControl group Physiotherapy and Hypnosis

The control group will be assessed initially and then after 4 weeks. After the second assessment, they will receive 6 sessions of physiotherapy combined with hypnosis (2 sessions per week, approximately 20-30 minutes each), and undergo a post-treatment evaluation after 1 month. All evaluation sessions will last approximately 1 hour.

Sponsors

University of Liege
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults aged 18 to 80 years old * Having experienced a stroke more than 3 months ago * Understanding and proficient in the French language * Having a functional capacity deficit in at least one of the two upper limbs * Being able to independently travel to the Yerne medical center for necessary study appointments.

Exclusion criteria

* Being under 18 or over 80 years old * Having a history of upper limb injuries (fractures, prosthetics, etc.) * Having Wernicke's aphasia (language comprehension disorder) * Having frontal lobe syndrome * Undergoing chemotherapy * Having respiratory disorders (respiratory failure of more than 70%) or receiving oxygen therapy * Having epilepsy * Having dementia * Having untreated hearing impairments * Being diagnosed with schizophrenia or paranoïa * Experiencing significant concentration difficulties

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Measurement of joint ranges of motion8 weeksMeasurement of shoulder (flexion, extension, abduction, internal rotation, external rotation), elbow (flexion, extension), wrist (flexion, extension)
assessment of spasticity8 weeksMeasurement of muscle activation on Ashworth scale (extension and flexion of shoulder, elbow, wrist, fingers, thumb) =\> 0%-100% (a higher score means a worse outcome)
functional tests for the upper limb8 weeksStroke Upper Limb Capacity Scale (SULCS) =\> 0%-100% (a higher score means a better outcome) * using one forearm as support while sitting * wedging an object between the chest and the upper part of the affected limb * sliding an object across a table while sitting * partially unscrewing a lid * taking a glass of water and drinking it * grabbing a tennis ball presented at a certain height * coming one's hair with the affected upper limb * buttoning * writing
scales for assessing disability and functional independence8 weeksFunctional Independence Measure (FIM) from complete dependence to independence =\> 0%-100% (a higher score means a better outcome) * personal care * sphincter control * mobility, transfers * locomotion * communication * awareness of the external world
evaluation of muscle strength8 weeksMeasurement of pathological upper limb strength on MRC scale by group/time/joint/movement =\> 0%-100% (a higher score means a better outcome) * Shoulder Flexion Strength * Shoulder Extension Strength * Shoulder Abduction Strength * Shoulder Internal Rotation Strength * Shoulder External Rotation Strength * Elbow Flexion Strength * Elbow Extension Strength * Wrist Flexion Strength * Wrist Extension Strength * Finger Flexion Strength * Finger Extension Strength * Thumb Flexion Strength * Thumb Extension Strength
Box and Block Test (BBT)8 weeksMeasurement of manual dexterity and motor skills by moving blocks into box comparing healthy upper limb with pathological upper limb =\> 0%-100% (a higher score means a better outcome)
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS)8 weeksMeasurement of degree of disability =\> 0%-100% (a higher score means a worse outcome)

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026