Skip to content

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of The Effect of Acetal Resin Versus PEEK on Supporting Structure of Abutment Teeth

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of The Effect of Acetal Resin Versus PEEK on Supporting Structure of Abutment Teeth in Mandibular Kennedy Class I Partial Dentures Manufactured by CAD-CAM Technology

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06882161
Enrollment
50
Registered
2025-03-18
Start date
2024-05-15
Completion date
2024-12-17
Last updated
2025-03-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Periodontal Diseases

Brief summary

This study was conducted to evaluate and compare the effect of acetal resin versus Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) partial dentures on abutment teeth supporting structures in Kennedy class I mandibular partial denture cases. Clinical assessments were conducted by assessing the pocket depth (PD), plaque index (PI), and gingival index (GI). Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was used to assess abutment alveolar bone height change.

Detailed description

This study was a parallel, two-group, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial. The proposal and consents were approved by the Research Ethics Committee. (REC) approval (P-PD-14-14). The Helsinki Declaration's guiding principles were followed when conducting the study. The Comprehensive Standards of Reporting Trials Statement (CONSORT) checklist's structure is followed in the study's presentation. The study was carried out at the Outpatient Clinic of the Removable Prosthodontic Department within the Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls at Al-Azhar University. In this study, fifty patients were initially evaluated. After conducting clinical and radiographic assessments, twenty patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria were selected in accordance with the sample size calculation. Each patient received an explanation of every procedure, and informed consent was obtained. These twenty individuals were subsequently divided randomly into two distinct groups (ten in each): Group I: Ten patients received polyoxymethylene (acetal resin) partial dentures designed and fabricated using CAD/CAM technology. Group II: Ten patients received polyether ether ketone (PEEK) partial dentures designed and fabricated using CAD/CAM technology. All patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically. Clinical assessments were conducted by assessing the pocket depth (PD), plaque index (PI), and gingival index (GI) at denture insertion, three months later and six months later. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was used to assess abutment alveolar bone height change at the time of denture placement, after three months, and after six months.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALAcetal resin

Effect of acetal resin versus Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) partial dentures on abutment teeth supporting structures in Kennedy class I mandibular partial denture cases

Sponsors

Al-Azhar University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

(patients and assessors)

Intervention model description

This study was a parallel, two-group, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
40 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Every subject should be free of any systemic diseases that might influence the results of the research. * Patient's residual ridges should be covered with healthy mucosa. * Their salivary flow and viscosity for all within normal limits. * The patients are cooperative and ready to be called back as necessary. * had a Class I Angle's ridge relation

Exclusion criteria

* Alcoholic or smokers' patients. * Patients with xerostomia or excessive salivation. * Patients with parafunctional habits. * Patients with ulcerated or inflamed mucosa.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pocket Depth6 monthsassessing the pocket depth (PD) of abutment teeth

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Plaque index6 monthsassessing the plaque index (PI) of abutment teeth
Gingival index6 monthsassessing the gingival index (GI) of abutment teeth
Abutment alveolar bone height change.6 monthsassessing the Abutment alveolar bone height of abutment teeth

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026