Skip to content

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Antibody/Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors With or Without TACE for Advanced HCC With Vascular Invasions

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Antibody/Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors With or Without Transarterial Chemoembolization as First-line Treatment for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Vascular Invasions

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06881446
Enrollment
2651
Registered
2025-03-18
Start date
2018-06-01
Completion date
2025-09-30
Last updated
2026-05-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)

Keywords

transarterial chemoembolization, hepatocellular carcinoma, immune checkpoint inhibitors, molecular target therapies

Brief summary

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody/tyrosine kinase inhibitors with or without transarterial chemoembolization as first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with vascular invasions

Detailed description

The vascular invasions is a common complication in 16% to 30% of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), contributing to poor prognosis and increasing the risk of cancer recurrence, with a median survival of approximately 2.7 to 4 months without intervention. Both the European Association for the Study of the Liver and the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases guidelines recommend that HCC patients with vascular invasions be classified as Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage C and receive systemic treatments. Nevertheless, there is limited data on patients with highly complicated HCC and no optimal treatment strategy for this patient population. anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody/tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are commonly utilized in the systemic therapy of HCC, while the combination of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) with systemic therapy has significantly improved treatment outcomes in advanced-stage patients. Therefore, we hypothesized that a triplet regimen comprising TACE,anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody/tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and ICIs may yield better prognoses for HCC patients with vascular invasions. This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of the triplet regimen of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody/tyrosine kinase inhibitors, ICIs, and TACE versus Lenvatinib combined with ICIs in advanced-stage HCC with vascular invasions

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Zhongda Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

1. Has a diagnosis of HCC confirmed by radiology, histology, or cytology; 2. Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C with the presence of macrovascular invasion; 3. Has not received any previous systemic therapy for HCC (including chemotherapy, molecularly targeted therapy, immunotherapy); 4. Both PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and anti-angiogenesis drugs patients received only include marketed drugs but are not limited to HCC approval; 5. TACE was performed after the first PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor/anti-angiogenic drug treatment or before treatment (within 3 months); 6. Received at least 1 cycle of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor/anti-angiogenic drug combination therapy after TACE treatment; 7. Has repeated measurable intrahepatic lesions;

Exclusion criteria

1. Cholangiocarcinoma, fibrolamellar, sarcomatoid hepatocellular carcinoma, and mixed hepatocellular/cholangiocarcinoma subtypes(confirmed by histology, or pathology) are not eligible; 2. Unable to meet criteria of combination timeframe described above; 3. Child-Pugh C or PS\>2 or Severe hepatic encephalopathy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival(OS)up to approximately 2 yearsThe OS is defined as the time from the initiation of any combination treatment to death due to any cause.
Progression free survival(PFS) according to per mRECIST or RECIST 1.1up to approximately 2 yearsper Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) Description: The PFS is defined as the time from the initiation of any combination treatment to the first documented progressive disease (according to RECIST 1.1) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PFS per Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) Description: The PFS is defined as the time from the initiation of any combination treatment to the first documented progressive disease (according to mRECIST) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ORR per mRECISTup to approximately 2 yearsThe ORR is defined as the proportion of patients with a documented CR or PR per mRECIST
Objective response rate(ORR) per RESCIST 1.1up to approximately 2 yearsThe ORR is defined as the proportion of patients with a documented complete response(CR) or partial response(PR) per RECIST 1.1.
Adverse event(AE) per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events(CTCAE) 5.0up to approximately 2 yearsThe percentage and degree of patients who experience at least one AE, whether or not considered related to the treatment, according to CTCAE version 5.0.

Countries

China

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORGao-Jun Teng, M.D

Zhongda hospital, Southeast university, Nanjing, China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 30, 2026