Skip to content

Effect of Bruxism on the Clinical Success of Posterior Composite Restorations

Effect of Bruxism on the Clinical Success of Posterior Composite Restorations in Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Cross-sectional, Case-Control Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06881355
Acronym
Bruxism
Enrollment
80
Registered
2025-03-18
Start date
2024-08-15
Completion date
2025-01-30
Last updated
2025-03-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bruxism, Fracture, Wear, Occlusal

Keywords

Bruxism, Posterior composite restoration, Clinical success, Endodontically tretaed tooth

Brief summary

The goal of this study is to determine the effect of bruxism on the success of posterior composite restorations (PCRs) in endodontically treated teeth (ETT). The null hypotheses of present study were as follows: (1) bruxism would not have a significant effect on the success rate of PCRs in ETT; (2) other demographic and clinical variations, such as frequency of coloring agent usage, smoking habits, presence of pulpal pathology, periapical lesion, periodontal condition, antagonist tooth condition, cavity margin level, quality of endodontic treatment, enamel cracks, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders, lateral occlusion scheme, institution where the restoration was performed, number of restored surfaces, and follow-up period, would not have a significant effect on the success rate of PCRs in ETT; and (3) functional, esthetic, and biological clinical success of PCRs of bruxists would not differ from that of non-bruxists. This cross-sectional, case-control study included 40 case patients (bruxists with PCR post-ETT) and 40 controls (non-bruxists). Sociodemographic characteristics and clinical findings were recorded. The PCRs on the relevant teeth were evaluated according to the revised FDI criteria.

Detailed description

In studies that have conducted long-term follow-ups of posterior composite restorations (PCRs), the most common causes of failure are secondary caries, wear, and fractures. The success of PCRs is influenced by several factors: oral hygiene habits, caries risk, size of the carious lesion, occlusal relationships, presence of parafunctional habits, physical properties of the material used, tooth region in which the restoration is placed, size and location of the restoration, and chewing habits and forces. In addition, the literature suggests that PCRs have a low wear resistance. While this characteristic is considered to offer an advantage in the presence of parafunctional habits, its effect on the success of PCRs under excessive occlusal stress remains a subject of debate. There are many prospective and retrospective studies evaluating the performance of restorations; however, literature on the success of composite resin materials when applied as direct restorations of ETT in patients with bruxism is limited. Furthermore, with the continuous development and introduction of new adhesive techniques and improvements in the composition of composite resin materials, clinical studies need to be updated regularly to assess the performance of restorations.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTBruxism diagnosis

The presence of bruxism was determined based on the participant's self-reported statements and intraoral findings.

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTClinical evaluation

The PCRs on the relevant teeth were evaluated according to the revised FDI criteria

Sponsors

Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged 18-40 years, PCRs after endodontic treatment, * Restorations up to 5 years, * Class 1 and 2 restorations with a maximum of 3 wall loss according to cavity classification and not involving the cusps, * Patients with low and moderate caries risk, and those with an occlusion classified as Class 1 Angle.

Exclusion criteria

* Teeth without antagonists; * patients with crossbite; mobile teeth; * teeth diagnosed with acute apical/periodontal abscess; * presence of severe periodontal disease; * presence of systemic diseases; * pregnant and breastfeeding women; * patients who had amalgam, post, or indirect methods chosen for definitive restoration after endodontic treatment; * restorations performed more than 5 years ago; * patients aged \<18 or \>40 years; * restorations involving the cusps, * patients with high caries risk, and non-dental plaque biofilm-induced gingival diseases.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of Clinical success1-5 years-follow up periodFDI scoring system

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
% of patients with risk factors1-5 years-follow up periodClinical failure parameter

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026