Tinnitus, Subjective
Conditions
Keywords
Subjective tinnitus, neuromodulation, audio-proprio-phonatory reinforcement, high-density electroencephalogram
Brief summary
Our ecological approach to neuromodulation in the field of acouphonology empowers tinnitus patients to act as their own source of sound stimuli through audio-proprio-phonatory reinforcement (APPR). By engaging in self-phonations, individuals uncoverthe vast potential for sound production, which can effectively mask their tinnitus or induce residual inhibition, all without relying on external sources. This clinical study aims to illustrate the positive impact of audio-proprio-phonatory reinforcement training on individuals suffering from chronic subjective tinnitus. This will be further supported and quantified through high-definition electroencephalography (HD EEG) as we explore the relationship between changes in connectivity within specific brain regions and the varying degrees of response to the therapeutic protocol.
Detailed description
Three visits will be conducted, with intervals of two periods lasting five weeks each. Inclusion visit (T0): Following the assessment of eligibility, the patient will receive an informative document regarding the study. After a period of contemplation, the patient will provide consent to participate. This visit will include a medical examination, an APPR test accompagnied by spectrogram feedback, a tinnitus assessment focusing on residual inhibition, high-density electroencephalograms and self-assessment questionnaires. Phase 1: Other the course of five weeks, Group A, designated foraudio-proprio-phonatory training will participate in one group videoconference session each week, along with daily exercises to complete. Participants will also be required to self-assess using the Visual Analog Scale of discomfort (VAS-D) on the days of the group workshops and on Fridays (both morning and evening). Concurrently, Group B, labeled no training will conduct self-assessments using the VAS-D on Mondays and Fridays (morning and evening). T1 visit: This visit will involve a medical examination, high-density electroencephalograms and self-assessment questionnaires will be performed. Phase 2: The 2 groups will switch roles and follow the same protocol as outlined in phase 1. End of study visit (T2): A medical examination and self-assessment questionnaires will be conducted.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALThe intervention is an audio-proprio-phonatory training
The audio-proprio-phonatory training involves engaging in group workshops and performing exercise sessions independently, following the guidance provided by the specialist, over a duration of five weeks
DIAGNOSTIC_TESThigh-density electroencephalogram (HD-EEG)
HD-EEG examination with 256 channels distributed throughout the skull that record resting brain connectivity(10 min).
Sponsors
Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Caregiver)
Masking description
Neurology staff performing the HD EEG examination will not know the treatment arm.
Intervention model description
This study is prospective, randomized into two groups with stratification based on the THI score specifically comparing grade 3 to grades 4 and 5. The neurology staff conducting the HD EEG examination will remain unaware of the treatment allocation, ensuring a single-blinded design.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 84 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Person who agreed to participate in the study and gave consent * Aged ≥ 18 years and \< 85 years * Suffering from subjective tinnitus for more than 3 months * Have a score on the THI questionnaire taken at T0 greater than or equal to 38 * Be equipped with a smartphone compatible with the Siopi application and a computer connection for videoconference sessions * Have answered the questionnaires on the Siopi application: THI, VAS-D and associated questions and insomnia severity index * Have committed to diligently following the study protocol, including independent training * Have agreed not to take other new treatments for tinnitus throughout the duration of the study * Able to understand and carry out assessment instructions.
Exclusion criteria
* Patient suffering from objective tinnitus * Current port of white noise generators * Patient having consulted phoniatrics more than twice or having participated in more than two sound-mediated workshop sessions * Bilateral hearing loss \> 40 dB uncorrected on an audiogram or having declared serious or severe hearing loss on Siopi questionnaire, with or without prosthetic correction * New therapy introduced less than 2 months ago * Psychatric disorders causing auditory hallucinations * Protected person (under guardianship or curatorship) * Person under judicial protection * Person deprived of liberty * Person not affiliated to a social security system * Pregnant or breastfeeding woman * Person participating in a drug study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The objective is to assess whether training that incorporates audio-proprio-phonatory reinforcement (APPR) can alleviate the daily life disability associated with tinnitus, in comparison to patients who have not undergo APPR training. | Evaluation at T0 (Day 0) and T1 (Day 42 +/- 7 days) of the study. | The international Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) questionnaire will be employed to assess the influence of training on the quality of patients affected by tinnitus.. This assessment will include a comparison of the changes in THI scores from T0 (Day 0) to T1 (Day 42) in the group that underwent APPR training, relative to the changes in THI scores from T0 (Day 0) to T1 (Day 42) in the group that did not receive APPR training. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Study the stability over time of quality of life (THI score) after APPR training. | Evaluation at T1 (Day 42 +/- 7 days) and T2 (Day 92 +/- 7 days) | To study stability over time, only data from patients in group A, without APPR training between T1 (Day 42) et T2 (Day 92) will be used : \- The THI score (scale from 0 to 100 with 10 being the worst score) measured at T1 and T2 This will involve comparing the results at T2 compared to T1. |
| Study the stability over time of tinnitus-related discomfort (VAS) after APPR training. | Evaluation at T1 (Day 42 +/- 7 days) and T2 (Day 92 +/- 7 days) | To study stability over time, only data from patients in group A, without APPR training between T1 (Day 42) et T2 (Day 92) will be used : \- VAS-D tinnitus scale (scale from 0 to 10 with 10 being the worst score), completed by te patient (on the Siopi application), weekly between T1 and T2, 4 times per week. |
| Describe the evolution of quality of life (THI score) during the study | Evaluation at T0 (Day 0), T1 (Day 42 +/- 7 days) and T2 (Day 92 +/- 7 days) | Evolution over time of the THI score (scale from 0 to 100 with 10 being the worst score) measured at T0 (Day 0), T1 (Day 42) and T2 (Day 92) for the 2 groups. |
| Describe the evolution of other collateral discomfort (noise) to tinnitus of patients who followed APPR training, compared to patients without APPR training | Evaluation at T0 (Day 0), T1 (Day 42 +/- 7 days) and T2 (Day 92 +/- 7 days) | Visual analog scale VAS-D (scale from 0 to 10 with 10 being the worst score) associated questions about noises, completed by the patient (on the Siopi application), weekly between T0 (Day 0) and T1 (Day 42), at a rate of 4 times per week, for the 2 groups. We will compare the evolution of each VAS-D taken independantly, taking the daily average of VAS-D concerned, over the 5 weeks between T0 and T1 for the 2 groups. |
| Describe the evolution of other collateral discomfort (cervical pain) to tinnitus of patients who followed APPR training, compared to patients without APPR training | Evaluation at T0 (Day 0), T1 (Day 42 +/- 7 days) and T2 (Day 92 +/- 7 days) | Visual analog scale VAS-D (scale from 0 to 10 with 10 being the worst score) associated questions with cervical pain completed by the patient (on the Siopi application), weekly between T0 (Day 0) and T1 (Day 42), at a rate of 4 times per week, for the 2 groups. We will compare the evolution of each VAS-D taken independantly, taking the daily average of VAS-D concerned, over the 5 weeks between T0 and T1 for the 2 groups. |
| Describe the evolution of other collateral discomfort (jaw pain) to tinnitus of patients who followed APPR training, compared to patients without APPR training | Evaluation at T0 (Day 0), T1 (Day 42 +/- 7 days) and T2 (Day 92 +/- 7 days) | Visual analog scale VAS-D (scale from 0 to 10 with 10 being the worst score) associated questions with jaw pain completed by the patient (on the Siopi application), weekly between T0 (Day 0) and T1 (Day 42), at a rate of 4 times per week, for the 2 groups. We will compare the evolution of each VAS-D taken independantly, taking the daily average of VAS-D concerned, over the 5 weeks between T0 and T1 for the 2 groups. |
| Determine whether APPR exercises reduce the discomfort linked to tinnitus in the short term (tinnitus discomfort VAS), compared to patients who have not followed APPR training | Evaluation at T0 (Day 0), T1 (Day 42 +/- 7 days) and T2 (Day 92 +/- 7 days) | Visual analog scale of discomfort (VAS-D) tinnitus (scale from 0 to 10 with 10 being the worst score), completed by the patient (on the Siopi application), weekly between T0 (Day 0) and T1 (Day 42), 4 times per week. * For the group with APPR training between T0 and T1, they will be completed : morning and evening, on the day of the group workshops (Monday or Tuesday) and on Friday * For the group without APPR training between T0 et T1, they will be completed : upon waking up and in the evening, every Monday and Friday. This will first involve comparing the average of the daily differences obtained over 5 weeks . Then we will compare the evolution (taking the daily average of the tinnitus VAS-D) over 5 weeks between T0 et T1 for the 2 groups. NB : These results can be confirmed bu analyzing the tinnitus VAS-D over the 5 weeks between T1 (Day 42) and T2 (Day 92) for group B (having the APPR training over this period. |
| Describe the evolution of other collateral discomfort(stress-anxiety) to tinnitus of patients who followed APPR training, compared to patients without APPR training | Evaluation at T0 (Day 0), T1 (Day 42 +/- 7 days) and T2 (Day 92 +/- 7 days) | Visual analog scales VAS-D (scale from 0 to 10 with 10 being the worst score) associated questions about stress-anxiety completed by the patient (on the Siopi application), weekly between T0 (Day 0) and T1 (Day 42), at a rate of 4 times per week, for the 2 groups. We will compare the evolution of each VAS-D taken independantly, taking the daily average of VAS-D concerned, over the 5 weeks between T0 and T1 for the 2 groups. |
| Evaluate the effect of APPR training on the usual connectivity of HD-EEG, compared to patients who did not follow APPR training | Evaluation at T0 (Day 0) and T1 (Day 42 +/- 7 days) | Exploratory analyzes of the different HD-EEG parameters measured at T0 (Day 0) and T1 (Day 42) in the 2 groups : The evolution of HD-EEG connectivity such as : network efficiency, dwill be described in the group with APPR training and compared to the evolution of this same parameter in the group without APPR training between T0 and T1. |
| Evaluate the effect of APPR training on the usual connectivity (duration of states) of HD-EEG, compared to patients who did not follow APPR training | Evaluation at T0 (Day 0) and T1 (Day 42 +/- 7 days) | Exploratory analyzes of the different HD-EEG parameters measured at T0 (Day 0) and T1 (Day 42) in the 2 groups : The evolution of HD-EEG microstate parameters such as : duration of states, will be described in the group with APPR training and compared to the evolution of this same parameter in the group without APPR training between T0 and T1. |
| Evaluate the effect of APPR training on the usual microstate parameters (distribution of states) of HD-EEG, compared to patients who did not follow APPR training | Evaluation at T0 (Day 0) and T1 (Day 42 +/- 7 days) | Exploratory analyzes of the different HD-EEG parameters measured at T0 (Day 0) and T1 (Day 42) in the 2 groups : The evolution of HD-EEG connectivity and microstate parameters such as : distribution of states, will be described in the group with APPR training and compared to the evolution of this same parameter in the group without APPR training between T0 and T1. |
| Describe the evolution of the quality of life (THI score) of patients before and after APPR training and the usual connectivity and microstate parameters of HD-EEG, over time. | Evaluation at T0 (Day 0) and T1 (Day 42 +/- 7 days) | Exploratory analyzes of the search for correlation between evolution of connectivity parameters of HD-EEG (determine specific parameters like distribution of states) with the evolution of THI score (scale from 0 to 100 with 100 being the worst score) will be explored (between T0 and T1) |
| Describe the evolution of other collateral discomfort (sleep) to tinnitus of patients who followed APPR training, compared to patients without APPR training | Evaluation at T0 (Day 0), T1 (Day 42 +/- 7 days) and T2 (Day 92 +/- 7 days) | Visual analog scale VAS-D (scale from 0 to 10 with 10 being the worst score) associated questions about sleep completed by the patient (on the Siopi application), weekly between T0 (Day 0) and T1 (Day 42), at a rate of 4 times per week, for the 2 groups. We will compare the evolution of each VAS-D taken independantly, taking the daily average of VAS-D concerned, over the 5 weeks between T0 and T1 for the 2 groups. |
Countries
France
Contacts
Primary ContactIsabelle Dr MARIE-BAILLY, PhD
Outcome results
None listed