Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety Study of QLM3003 Ointment in Participants With Mild or Moderate Atopic Dermatitis

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of QLM3003 Ointment in Participants With Mild or Moderate Atopic Dermatitis

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06880276
Enrollment
360
Registered
2025-03-17
Start date
2025-05-16
Completion date
2027-05-31
Last updated
2025-08-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atopic Dermatitis

Brief summary

It is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase 3 clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of QLM3003 ointment at week 8 based on the primary endpoint (EASI 75) and key secondary endpoint (IGA-TS).in patients with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis. A total of 360 patients with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis are planned to be included and randomized at a ratio of 1:1:1 to receive 1.5% QLM3003 ointment、2% QLM3003 ointment and placebo, twice a day.

Interventions

DRUG1.5% QLM3003 ointment

QLM3003 topical cream; 1.5% cream applied twice daily (BID)

DRUG2% QLM3003 ointment

QLM3003 topical cream; 2% cream applied twice daily (BID)

vehicle; vehicle applied twice daily (BID)

Sponsors

Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female, 18-75 years old * The diagnosis of atopic dermatitis (AD) during screening meets the Hanifin⁃Rajka standard, and the history of AD/ eczema ≥1 year before screening. All of the following conditions must be met during the screening and baseline periods:Number of participants with IGA score of 2 or 3.AD involving the head and neck (scalp excluded), trunk, and extremities, with a total affected BSA of 3-20% (inclusive)

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects with comorbidities or other conditions that may interfere with the assessment of the investigational drug or the study disease, as determined by the investigator to be ineligible for participation * Patients whose current AD disease status was assessed by the investigators to be unstable (spontaneous improvement or rapid deterioration) were not eligible to participate in the study. * Patients who have received a marketed or investigational biologic for the treatment of AD, such as Dupilumab, within 3 months before baseline or within 5 half-lives of the drug (whichever was longer). * Patients who had received systemic or topical JAK inhibitor therapy, including but not limited to Tofacitinib, Ruxolitinib, Upadacitinib, Baricitinib, Abrocitinib, Ivarmacitinib, and Gecacitinib, within 4 weeks before baseline or within 5 half-lives of the drug (whichever was longer).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving >=75% Improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index Total Score (EASI-75) From Baseline at Weeks 8Baseline, Week 8EASI evaluates severity of participant's AD (excluded scalp, palms, soles) based on severity of AD clinical signs and % of body surface area (BSA) affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions(head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\] and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]) on4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based upon % BSA with AD in each 4 body region: 0 (0%), 1 (\>0 to \<10%), 2 (10 to \<30%), 3 (30 to \<50%), 4 (50 to \<70%), 5 (70 to \<90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score =0.1\*Ah\*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2\*Au\*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3\*At\*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4\*Al\*(El+Il+Exl+Ll); A = EASI area score; E = erythema; I = induration/papulation; Ex = excoriation; L = lichenification; h = head and neck; u = upper limbs; t = trunk; l = lower limbs. Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, higher scores = greater severity of AD.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) and a Reduction From Baseline of Greater Than or Equal to ( >=2) Points at Week 8Baseline, Week 8IGA assesses severity of participant's AD on a 5 point scale. 0= clear, no inflammatory signs of AD; 1= almost clear, AD not fully cleared- light pink residual lesions (except post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation), just perceptible erythema, papulation/induration lichenification, excoriation, and no oozing/crusting; 2= mild AD with light red lesions, slight but definite erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and no oozing/crusting; 3= moderate AD with red lesions, moderate erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and slight oozing/crusting and 4= severe AD with deep dark red lesions, severe erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and moderate to severe oozing/crusting. Higher scores indicating more severity of AD. Assessment excluded soles, palms and scalp.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactMingxia Lv, Master
mingxia.lv@gilu-pharma.com13256161060
Backup ContactXinghua Gao, Doctor
gaobarry@hotmail.com024-83283391

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026