Anemia, Coagulopathy
Conditions
Brief summary
The goal of the study is data collection on available fixed and personal assets required for Patient Blood Management (elements of the 3 pillars of PBM) in Central Eastern Europe countries hospitals, status before and after PBM training.
Detailed description
The goals of the PBM program: * Improving patient care and optimizing blood management - quality assurance * bleeding management based on latest scientific guidelines including: 1. reduction of transfusion and better outcomes 2. optimization of blood reserves 3. introduction and acceptance of hospital protocols Previous research has identified gaps concerning implementation of PBM elements in CEE region calling for further research and training: anemia is not being managed appropriately, there are no protocols in place, patient journey is not clearly defined, it is not clear at which department should be anemia treated; availability of POC devices varies largely among countries; local protocols for management of severe bleeding are also missing in many hospitals. Investigators plan to collect PBM implementation indicators in hospitals before PBM training at a given start point as baseline (first self audit) and re-evaluate achievements after 6 months after training (second self audit). Investigators plan to define 2x1 week snapshot period for detailed analysis of perioperative approach at patient level (1 week at the beginning of the study and 1 week after 6 month). Investigators assume that properly conducted self-audits followed by PBM training, optimizing local protocols and patient journeys, a reduction in the use of perioperative blood products may be achieved, which, in addition to the currently experienced decrease in the desire to donate blood, may lead to a more rational blood product management and better patient outcomes. PBM Implementation indicators for hospitals (data to be collected): * PBM administration & training data - are there PBM managers/local protocols available? was there any PBM training of staff performed? * Pilar I.: data about diagnosis and management of anemia; patient pathways; medications used to treat anemia * Pilar II.: blood saving techniques; usage of blood products (transfusion) and/or factor concentrates; iatrogenic blood loss - lab test tubes size * Pilar III.: RBC tranfusion triggers; Patient level data: * age, gender, type of surgical intervention * data about anemia management (performed or not by whom, when and what treatment was received if any * data about existing anticoagulant therapy an management * data about bleeding management (blood loss, transfusion requirements, factor concentrates (used quantities per routine medical intervention), POC tests evaluations if any, and standard laboratory test performed per routine medical approach before, during and after surgery * data about postoperative outcomes
Interventions
No intervention other than routine medical practice
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* patients above 18 years of age * patients undergoing elective medium and high bleeding risk surgical intervention defined as moderate (\<500 ml) and high (≥ 500 ml) * patient consent
Exclusion criteria
* no patient consent * patients under 18 years of age * pregnant patients * surgery with a low risk of bleeding * the patient underwent emergency (non-elective) surgery
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Was the PBM training able to significantly reduce the use of blood products in the audited periods? | second self audit versus first self audit ( 6 months) | Identification of local and country level PBM gaps during the first self audit followed by training and corrective measures, reidentification of remaining local and country level PBM gaps during the second self audit: 1. Reduction of RBC, FFP and TC in Units 2. PBM trained physichian in number |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Material assets for the PBM pillars | second self audit versus first self audit ( 6 months) | 1. increase in use of POC tests (number of tests) 2. increase in use of factor concentrates (IU) 3. local hemostasis management protocols (YES/NO) |
| Impact of PBM implementation on postoperative care | second self audit versus first self audit ( 6 months) | Time spent in the intensive care unit in the postoperative period (ICU days) |
| PBM implementation impact on infection rates | second self audit versus first self audit ( 6 months) | Postoperative infection rate |
| PBM implemetnation impact on mortality | second self audit versus first self audit ( 6 months) | 30 days mortality |
Countries
Hungary