Regional Anaesthesia, Transversus Abdominis Plane Block
Conditions
Keywords
prospective randomised trial, 4 quadrant TAP-Block, Transversus Abdominis Plane Block, ultrasound-guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block, laparoscopic, landmark-based Transversus Abdominis Plane Block
Brief summary
The Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (TAP) has become one of the most established and frequently performed trunk wall blocks for perioperative analgesia in abdominal surgical procedures. The TAP-Block can be performed by both surgeons and anaesthetists. The goal of this prospective, randomized study is to compare an anesthesiological, ultrasound-guided "Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block" with a laparoscopic, landmark-based "Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block" The main questions it aims to answer are: Primary Hypothesis: There are no differences in postoperative pain perception and analgesic requirements between the anaesthesiological ultrasound-guided and the surgical laparoscopic landmark-based TAP block Secondary Hypothesis: There are no significant differences in the duration of the procedure between the anaesthesiological, ultrasound-guided and the surgical laparoscopic landmark-based TAP block.
Detailed description
The Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (TAP) has become one of the most established and frequently performed trunk wall blocks for perioperative analgesia in abdominal surgical procedures. A TAP block is a so-called trunk wall block where a targeted injection of high volumes of local anesthetics is made into a space between two muscle fascias, the so-called inter-fascial space. In this inter-fascial space, the cutaneous nerve branches of various anterior rami of the spinal nerves run and innervate somatosensory in the respective dermatome, skin, soft tissues, and bones, as well as the outer layers of the pleura and peritoneum. Specifically, in a TAP block, the nerve fibers of the spinal nerves from the spinal segments Th6 to L1 can be anaesthetized by applying local anaesthetics between the Musculus obliquus internus abdominis and the Musculus transversus abdominis. The block produces somatic analgesia of the skin, muscles, and bony structures. Visceral analgesia of the internal organs is not achieved. Therefore, the TAP block mainly has an indication within the framework of a multimodal pain concept to save central and peripheral analgesics. In the literature, it is shown that especially laparoscopic procedures benefit from a TAP block in terms of reducing postoperative reported pain intensity and reducing postoperative opioid requirements. Compared to simple wound infiltration with a local anaesthetic or simple local anaesthesia of the trocar insertion sites in a laparoscopy, the TAP block has been shown to be a more effective method in multiple studies. The so-called Transversus Abdominis Plane compartment can be reached using various approaches (posterior, lateral, subcostal) and puncture techniques (landmark-based, ultrasound-guided, and surgical). A lateral approach is used primarily for analgesia in lower abdominal surgery (e.g., inguinal hernia repair). A subcostal approach is used primarily for analgesia in upper abdominal/supraumbilical surgery (e.g., cholecystectomy). A dual TAP block or '4 quadrant block,' the combination of a lateral with subcostal TAP block, could achieve better abdominal distribution of the local anaesthetic and more complete analgesia for the lower (T10-T12) and upper (T6-T9) abdomen. The goal of this monocentric, prospective, randomised study is to compare an anesthesiological, ultrasound-guided "Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block" with a laparoscopic, landmark-based "Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block" in two parallel study arms. Anaesthesia Induction and maintenance in both groups are standardised and similar. The main questions to answer are: Primary Hypothesis: There are no differences in postoperative pain perception and analgesic requirements between the anaesthesiological ultrasound-guided and the surgical laparoscopic landmark-based TAP block Secondary Hypothesis: There are no significant differences in the duration of the procedure between the anaesthesiological, ultrasound-guided and the surgical laparoscopic landmark-based TAP block. A sample size calculation was performed before study start. The hypotheses will be verified by suitable statistical analysis. The randomization process is performed preoperatively using a closed envelope ('Sealed Envelope') that assigns a patient to one of the two intervention groups.
Interventions
PROCEDUREArm 1: The anaesthesiologically performed, ultrasound-guided, 4 quadrant-TAP block ( a combination of a lateral with a subcostal TAP block bilaterally)
Injection of a total of 60 ml ropivacaine 0.2% into the target compartment (2x 20 ml laterally, 2x 10 ml subcostally)
PROCEDUREArm2: The surgically performed, laparoscopic landmark-based assisted TAP block
Injection of a total of 6 x 10 ml = 60 ml ropivacaine 0.2% into the target compartment (at 3 defined puncture sides bilaterally: at the anterior axillary line at 2 different, fixed heights and at the midclavicular line subcostally)
Sponsors
Sana Klinikum Offenbach
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Consent of the adult patient * Elective laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery, elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, or elective laparoscopic fundoplication
Exclusion criteria
* Lack of patient consent * Pregnancy and breastfeeding * Allergies to local anaesthetics used * Infections at the puncture sites * History of complex abdominal wall reconstruction * Chronic pain syndrome * Fibromyalgia * Chronic opioid use * Chronic alcohol abuse * Chronic drug abuse (THC, amphetamines, cocaine, etc.) * Psychiatric preconditions (depression, schizophrenia, etc.) * Patients with impaired consciousness, communication, or cognitive function * Diagnosed coagulopathies (e.g., platelet count \<80,000/µL, PTT/aPTT- prolongation \>1.5 upper normal value) * Therapeutic anticoagulation
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Assessment of the postoperative pain perception using the NRS pain scale | First 24 hours postoperatively | Standardized pain assessments postoperatively are conducted by the in-house anaesthesiological pain service using a standardized pain form (which consists of a NRS Scoring in rest and at motion at fixed times \[1 hour, 2 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours\]). The anaesthesiological pain service is blinded to the procedure performed. |
| Assessment of the postoperative analgesic requirements/consumption within the first 24 hours after surgery | First 24 hours postoperatively | An assessment of the cumulative analgesic consumption in the first 24 hrs. postoperatively is conducted by the in-house anaesthesiological pain service. Both total opioid consumption (in mg) and consumption of basic analgetics (e.g. paracetamol, metamizole, etc.)(in mg) are measured. The anaesthesiological pain service is blinded to the procedure performed. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Duration of the TAP block procedure | perioperatively | Duration of the TAP block procedure, defined as the time from the first needle introduction to the completed application of the total amount of the local anaesthetic (in minutes). |
Countries
Germany
Contacts
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORProf.Dr. H. Mutlak
Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, and Pain Therapy at the Sana Klinikum Offenbach
Outcome results
None listed