Skip to content

McKenzie vs Pilates Exercises in People With Chronic Low Back Pain

Home-Based, Video-Supported McKenzie vs. Pilates Exercise Programs for Individuals With Chronic Low Back Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06875921
Enrollment
32
Registered
2025-03-13
Start date
2025-03-10
Completion date
2025-04-20
Last updated
2025-04-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Low Back Pain

Keywords

Chronic low back pain, Pilates, McKenzie, Physiotherapy, Home-based exercise

Brief summary

Brief Summary: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a persistent condition lasting more than 12 weeks, often leading to pain, disability, and reduced quality of life. This clinical study aims to compare the effectiveness of McKenzie and Pilates exercise programs in managing CLBP symptoms. A total of 32 participants will be randomly assigned to two equal groups: one performing McKenzie exercises and the other engaging in Pilates routines. The intervention will span three weeks. Outcomes will be assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain intensity, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) for functional impairment, a pressure algometer for pain sensitivity (PPT), and the Fingertip-to-Floor test (FTF) for range of motion (ROM). A two-way repeated-measures ANOVA will be used for statistical analysis, with significance set at p \< .05.

Detailed description

Background Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is characterized by persistent pain in the lumbar region lasting for more than 12 weeks, often leading to functional limitations and a decline in quality of life. Exercise-based interventions, such as the McKenzie method and Pilates, are widely implemented in managing CLBP symptoms, but direct comparisons of their effectiveness remain limited. Aim This study aims to evaluate and compare the effects of the McKenzie method and Pilates exercises on pain relief, functional disability, and range of motion in individuals with CLBP. The objective is to determine whether one approach is more beneficial than the other in alleviating symptoms and enhancing physical function. Method Thirty-two participants diagnosed with CLBP will be randomly assigned into two equal groups. One group will follow a McKenzie-based exercise program, while the other will engage in a Pilates regimen. Both interventions will last three weeks. Pain intensity will be assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), functional disability will be measured with the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), pain sensitivity will be evaluated through the pressure pain threshold (PPT) using an algometer, and range of motion will be determined by the Fingertip-to-Floor (FTF) test. Measurements will be taken before and after the intervention. Statistical analysis will be conducted using a two-way repeated-measures ANOVA to examine within- and between-group differences, with the significance level set at p \< .05. Expected Results This study aims to compare the effectiveness of McKenzie and Pilates exercises in managing CLBP symptoms. Both methods are expected to provide significant improvements in pain reduction, disability, and pain sensitivity. However, since Pilates exercises emphasize flexibility, it is anticipated that they will result in a greater improvement in range of motion compared to the McKenzie method. Consequently, while similar outcomes are expected in most measured parameters, a superior increase in ROM is anticipated in the Pilates group.

Interventions

OTHERMcKenzie Exercise Group

The intervention will last 7 minutes and will consist of the following exercises: * Four Extension Exercises: Lying Face Down, Lying Face Down in Extension, Repeated Lumbar Extension in Lying, Repeated Lumbar Extension in Standing. * Two Flexion Exercises: Repeated Lumbar Flexion in Lying, Repeated Lumbar Flexion in Sitting.

The intervention will last 20 minutes and will include Pilates exercises focused on mobility and strengthening.

Sponsors

International Hellenic University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

A masked assessor will conduct the measurements

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Duration of symptoms 12 weeks * Age range between 18 and 60 years * Pain score ≥ 2cm in VAS scale * Written consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Neuropathic pain extending along the lower limb due to nerve root compression * Previous spine surgery * History of spine trauma or fracture * Implanted pacemakers * Pregnancy * Cancer * Systemic musculoskeletal diseases, diagnosed neurodegenerative diseases (e.g., Parkinson's), epilepsy, and history of psychiatric disorders

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Low Back Pain (LBP) Intensity Using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Pre-treatment, Post-treatment (Week 3)The VAS is a 10 cm pain scale with no numerical markings. The left end represents No pain, while the right end corresponds to Worst possible pain. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity. Participants will complete the scale twice-before and after the intervention-marking the level of pain experienced over the past 24 hours. Pain intensity will be quantified by measuring the distance from the zero point (No pain) to the indicated score
Changes in Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) Using Pressure AlgometryPre-treatment, Post-treatment (Week 3)Pressure pain threshold (PPT) refers to the minimum amount of pressure required to elicit pain. A digital algometer will be used to measure PPT bilaterally at the L4-L5 intervertebral space. The device's metal rod will be placed perpendicularly on the site, and pressure will be gradually increased at a rate of 1 kg/s until the participant reports pain. PPT will be recorded in N/cm².
Changes in Functional Capacity Using the Greek Version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ)Pre-treatment, Post-treatment (Week 3)Functional capacity will be assessed using the validated Greek version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), which consists of 24 items addressing daily activities impacted by low back pain. Each selected statement adds one point to the total score, with higher values indicating greater disability.
4. Changes in Lumbar Spine Flexion Range of Motion Using the Fingertip-to-Floor (FTF) TestPre-treatment, Post-treatment (Week 3)Spinal mobility will be evaluated using the Fingertip-to-Floor Test, a widely used clinical tool for assessing trunk flexion. Participants will be asked to bend forward and reach toward the ground while keeping their knees and hips extended. The examiner will measure the vertical distance between the participant's fingertips and the floor using a tape measure.

Countries

Greece

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026