Bone Augmentation, Badly Broken Maxillary Premolars Indicated for Extraction
Conditions
Brief summary
Statement of the problem: Immediate implant placement is faced with several problems. One of the most important issues is dealing with defects in the buccal plate of bone in the esthetic zone. Aim: The aim of this study is to assess the buccal bone thickness after augmentation with titanium mesh and xenograft upon flapless immediate implant placement.
Detailed description
Statement of the problem: Immediate implant placement is faced with several problems. One of the most important issues is dealing with defects in the buccal plate of bone in the esthetic zone. Aim: The aim of this study is to assess the buccal bone thickness after augmentation with titanium mesh and xenograft upon flapless immediate implant placement. Materials and Methods: This parallel arm, randomized controlled clinical trial will involve systemically free patients with remaining roots or badly decayed teeth in the anterior region and buccal bone deficiency requiring implant placement. They will be randomly allocated to two equal groups. Group A (test group, n=10) will receive immediate implants (grafting with xenograft covered by titanium mesh covered by collagen membrane), while group B (test group, n=10) will receive immediate implants (grafting with xenograft covered by collagen membrane). The parameters ( buccal bone thickness & soft tissue thickness will be assessed at 6 & 12 months. Postoperative pain and swelling will be recorded daily by the patient for the 1st two weeks post surgically. Postoperative medication will be prescribed to the patient and postoperative instructions will be explained in detail. Follow-up will be performed to assess the parameters and to ensure performing proper oral hygiene. Data collected will be tabulated and statistically analyzed.
Interventions
PROCEDUREcollagen membrane
augmentation of the buccal plate of bone with xenograft and collagen membrane
PROCEDUREtitanium mesh
augmentation of the buccal plate of bone with xenograft and titanium mesh
Sponsors
Misr International University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
1. Patients who have at least one remaining root or badly decayed tooth in anterior maxilla. 2. Systemically free patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists I; ASA I) 3. Patients aged from 21 to 50 years old 4. Buccal bone partial deficiency (extraction socket type II) 5. Good oral hygiene 6. Accepts the follow-up period (cooperative patients) 7. Patient accepts to provides an informed consent
Exclusion criteria
1. Patients with habits that may jeopardize the implant longevity and affect the results of the study such as parafunctional habits such as bruxism 2. Smokers 3. Pregnant and lactating females
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Buccal bone thickness | at baseline, 6 and 12 months | assessment of the Buccal bone thickness in mm using CBCT |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Soft tissue thickness | at baseline 6 and 12 months | Soft tissue thickness will be assessed in mm using volumetric analysis method |
| Keratinized tissue width | at baseline, 6 and 12 months | measurement of the keratinized tissue width in mm using periodontal probe |
Countries
Egypt
Outcome results
None listed