Skip to content

An Innovative Method in SAliva Samples for the Early Differential Diagnosis of High-impact NeuroDegenerative Diseases Through Raman Spectroscopy

An Innovative Method in SAliva Samples for the Early Differential Diagnosis of High-impact NeuroDegenerative Diseases Through Raman Spectroscopy

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06875739
Acronym
SANDY
Enrollment
310
Registered
2025-03-13
Start date
2025-02-14
Completion date
2026-10-01
Last updated
2025-03-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer Disease, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Fronto-temporal Dementia, Neurodegenerative Disorders, Parkinson Disease, Parkinsonian Disorders

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to validate a salivary test that allows for rapid and accurate objective diagnosis in the context of neurodegenerative diseases, a complex of diseases that includes Alzheimer's Dementia, Frontotemporal Dementia, Parkinson's Disease, Atypical Parkinsonisms, and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. In particular, the study aims to validate the salivary method against methods already in use (CSF method) or better studied (blood-based method) to allow early recognition of the disease condition and a distinction between the various diseases in order to receive appropriate therapy when possible. In fact, the term neurodegenerative diseases is a broad term that includes disorders characterized by predominantly cognitive, motor, or mixed disorders for which early and accurate diagnosis of the disease is often difficult given also the variability with which these diseases can present. Ab initio recognition of a specific neurodegenerative disease would allow better pharmacological management of this disorder and facilitate the planning of care and rehabilitation interventions. In general, the recognition of neurodegenerative diseases could be facilitated by the use of a biomarker, which is a biological indicator that can be related to the onset or development of a disease. For this reason, it is necessary to compare the biomarker assay of patients with that of controls, so you were asked to participate as a Control Subject precisely because you do not have neurodegenerative disease. Participation in the study involves, in addition to the collection of clinical-demographic data, the performance of a cognitive screening test to attest that your cognitive performance is in the normal range and the collection of biological blood and salivary samples, to be compared with those of participants with neurodegenerative diseases. Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) polymorphism study will be performed on the blood. A genetic polymorphism is a variation in the DNA sequence present in at least 1% of the population, the determination of ApoE polymorphism will allow to define a His genetic characteristic related to a higher or lower risk of developing Alzheimer's Disease. Two specific biomarkers, called neurofilament light chain (NfL) and gliofibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), namely a marker of neurodegeneration and one of neuroinflammation, will also be assayed on blood. Analysis of some inflammatory proteins called cytokines will also be performed. On saliva, the biochemical composition will be evaluated with the analysis of particles present within it called vesicles by a method called Raman Spectroscopy, and the assay of specific biomarkers called NfL and GFAP will also be performed on saliva. The diagnosis of pathology made according to clinical diagnostic criteria and supported, when necessary, by the presence of recognized biomarkers (molecular imaging/liquid markers) will be used as a reference to evaluate the diagnostic capabilities of salivary methodology to detect different pathologies and to differentiate a pathological condition from Controls. Finally, the study will also include a comparison of salivary study methods on a group of people who are at a very early stage of disease, in order to detect whether the study performed with portable instrumentation is as good a method as that with laboratory instrumentation. In fact, the use of portable instrumentation would make it even easier to acquire a biomarker quickly directly from the clinic.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

FOR ALL SUBJECTS: between 60 and 85 years old FOR CASE: 1. ADD: diagnosis of dementia due to AD according to clinical criteria and supported by amyloid biomarkers (biomarkers in CSF or brain PET scan with amyloid-specific tracer) according to the definition biological or neurochemical definition of disease. 2. FTD: diagnosis of FTD-bv (behavioral variant) according to current clinical criteria. 3. PD: diagnosis according to MDS criteria; stable drug treatment (last 4 weeks). 4. APs: clinical diagnosis of Progressive Supranuclear Palsy according to the criteria of Hoglinger 2017, Corticobasal Degeneration according to the criteria of Armostrong 2013, Multisystem Atrophy according to the criteria of Wenning 2022. 5. ALS: clinical diagnosis according to the criteria of Brooks (2000) and subsequent revisions. FOR CONTROL SUBJECTS 1. subjects admitted to IRCCS Don Gnocchi Florence in the departments of cardiology, pulmonology, orthopedics 2. ABSENCE of neurological symptoms 3. ABSENCE OF diagnosis of neurological or psychiatric diseases. 4. absence of positive family history (relatives I and II degree) for NDDs. 5. condition of clinical stability 6. at least 15 days after the acute event causing hospitalization. FOR PRODROMAL CASE 1. Prodromal PD according to Berg's criteria. 2. prodromal FTD-bv according to Barker's criteria 3. prodromal AD according to the criteria of Dubois and Albert

Exclusion criteria

FOR CASE 1. Vascular Parkinsonism and other forms of secondary Parkinsonism such as drug-induced, other known or suspected causes (metabolic, brain tumor, etc.). 2. MoCA\<15 for subjects with PD 3. cases with validated biomarkers (CSF and PET) in diagnostic conflict. FOR ALL SUBJECTS 1. significant comorbidities 2. presence of severe systemic diseases or previously diagnosed psychiatric illnesses 3. patients unable to express consent for participation in the study themselves 4. presence of clinically unstable oral cavity disease (inflammatory/infectious) 5. time since acute event (if it occurred) \<15 days 6. presence of local or systemic infection/inflammation detected on routine examinations.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
denomination test of SANDat enrollmentdenomination of visual stimuli for all subjects except control cases
semantic, phonemic and alternate fluency Testat enrollmentsemantic, phonemic and alternate fluency Test for all subjects except control cases
Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS)at enrollmentit's a scale that records the comorbidity
Neurological Clinical informationsat enrollmentPresence/absence of symptoms/signs such as presence of speech disorder, hearing loss, low vision, dysphagia, oculomotricity disorder, disorientation, decreased insight, fatuity, perseveration/affacceleration, dx/sn recognition inability, gait disorder, instability/falls, neglect, ideomotor apraxia, signs of frontal release, rigidity/spasticity, bradykinesia, tremor or other involuntary movements, signs of first or second motor neuron, need for use of aids/presence of medical aids.
Genetic testat enrollmentgenetic testing will lead in NDDs and CTRL to the determination of the ApoE polymorphism (categorical variable). In NDDs, diagnostic investigation will aim to confirm/exclude a mutation in one of the disease-causing genes (APP, PS1, PS2, MAPT, PGRN, C9ORF72, SOD 1, TARDBP, VCP) in accordance with the pathological phenotype
Plasma testat enrollmentNfL and GFAP assay result on plasma (continuous numeric variables)
Salivary testat enrollmentresults of NfL and GFAP assay on saliva (continuous numeric variables)
nerological objective examination checklistat enrollmentpresence/absence of symptoms/signs such as presence of speech disorder, hearing impairment, low vision, dysphagia, oculomotor disorder, disorientation, decreased insight, fatuity, perseveration/affacility, dx/sn recognition inability, gait disorder, instability/falls, neglect, ideomotor apraxia, signs of frontal release, rigidity/spasticity, bradykinesia, tremor or other involuntary movements, signs of first or second motor neuron,need for use of aids/presence of medical aids (categorical variables)
UPDRS part III and IVat enrollmentevaluation of motor symptoms only for subjects with parkinson's disease or parkinsonisms
Hoehn and Yahr Scaleat enrollmentevaluation of clinical status only for subjects with parkinson's disease
NON-MOTOR SYMPTOMS SCALEat enrollmentevaluation of non motor symptoms only for subjects with parkinson's disease
Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R)at enrollmentevaluation of disability only for subjects with ALS
MONTREAL COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT (MOCA)at enrollmentCognitive screening test for all except control subjects
TRAIL MAKING TEST part A and Bat enrollmentevaluation of attentional skills for all subjects except control cases
STROOP TESTat enrollmentevaluation of inhibitory control for all subjects except control cases
REY'S 15-WORD TESTat enrollmentevaluation of long term memory for all subjects except control cases
REY OSTERRIETH COMPLEX FIGUREat enrollmentevaluation of visuospatial skills for all subjects except control cases
FACE TESTat enrollmentevaluation of ability to recognize mental states of others for all subjects except control cases
NEUROPSYCHIATRICH INVENTORY (NPI)at enrollmentinterview assessing behavioral of others for all subjects except control cases
FRONTAL ASSESSMENT BATTERY (FAB)at enrollmentevaluation of executive functions; for all subjects except control cases
MINIMENTAL STATE EXAMINATION (MMSE)at enrollmentcognitive screening only for subjects with ADD and with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026